Bye Jim!!
Have fun!!
Don't forget to write !!
Often !!
Ta ta!!
Bienvenido!!
Hope you unsubscribed well!!
See you!!
> -Original Message-
> From: Jim Colwell [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, April 23, 2005 7:53 PM
> To: pdml
> Subject: [pdml] unsubscribe
>
>
> ciao
>
>
awww.. thanks Frank :)
I appreciate the compliment :)
This couple wanted nothing but digital but I couldn't help but sneak a few
film shots in - they trusted my judgement :)
Cheers
Dave
> -Original Message-
> From: frank theriault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 26, 2005
> -Original Message-
> From: Tom C [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, May 03, 2005 8:02 PM
> To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> Subject: [personal] Re: Why and How I switched to Canon (for those who
> care) long
>
> Sent for the 3rd time...
Seen it all three times here. :-)
Dave
Hmm.. I wonder if I'll eventually have to do this with my 10D ;-)
Lurking till I hear about a TOPDML,
Dave ;-)
> -Original Message-
> From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Sunday, April 04, 2004 12:54 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: *istD sensor cleaning
>
>
I've been staying out of this one for the most part but I must agree with
Bruce here.
The Date Function, while it may be handy for some, is sort of pointless in
my books.
The Contax G2 data back gave a lot more information - exposure info for
example - that may be more useful and it imprinted it be
Hi folks...
In my quest for maintaining constant power to my numerous flashes (Metz and
Vivitar) I'm curious to find out if any of you out there are using any
Quantum Battery Packs.
If you are, how do you like them? Which type are you using?
As the spring and wedding season approach I know that
Would this suggest or hint at the *ist D being delayed as well or do we feel
that it will be on time ?
Curious
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Henry Henry [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, March 27, 2003 8:29 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Annoucement on *ist and lenses delay in
Well..
after realising that I had placed this FS ad, I then turned around this
evening to take photos of said camera with the 50mm f1.4 lens on it.
Guess where the camera WAS? (come on.. one guess)..
I'm only just realising that the scumbags took off with the ME-F as well..
nothing is safe in a l
These are great Dave.
I love Norman and Quiet Time
Nice shots of Superma.. I mean Jeff doing his Superman pose... :-) and Frank
too :-)
Speaking of Frank. Frank I've emailed you a few times over the last
day or so wrt a few different things but I don't know if the mail's getting
through.
Hi folks,
Thank you for your kind words regarding my situation. I appreciate it.
I guess, on the "upside", I have to be thankful that the thief(ves) didn't
break any of my windows to get in and that they didn't damage the car per
se.
I also have to realise that in the grand scheme of things, thi
Yep.. scans turned out just fine.
I often scan at 600dpi as well for the screen.
Usually it's ok and a good compromise b/w the resolution and time it takes
to scan.
I can imagine Jeff falling forward ... that Fuji 6x9 is a beast but takes
great shots.
Cheers,
Dave
-Original Message-
From
Hi Folks..
I just noted that the Epson 1280 has a $100 US rebate still in effect until
the end of this month.
As an 870 owner for the past few years I was wondering what you all may
think of the 1280.
With that $100 Rebate it's a tempting offer to upgrade so that I can print
out 11x14's here at ho
Yes Mark, very nice to meet you. Hope the drive back wasn't too
treacherous.
And ya.. I retract my previous statements about the MZ-S from an ergonomic
standpoint.
It's a nice camera to hold portrait or landscape wise..
and that limited... ah...
I may have to buy more pentax gear :)
Hi everyone,
I'm curious, for those who use backgrounds, which do they prefer and why;
seamless paper or muslin?
I've been considering purchasing a background for myself for portrait and
full body work but now I have a suspicion that seamless paper may be more
convenient and, in the long run, mor
If you don't Tom..
I WILL ;-)
Smirkingly,
Dave
> -Original Message-
> From: tom [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, June 13, 2003 7:50 PM
> To: pdml
> Subject: Show Pics
>
>
>
> I think I'll call her and see if she wants to have another go.
>
>
>
>
>
Same here.. I've used both the Blad and the G2 and have never had a problem
with flare. And I don't use a shade on my 80mm T*.
I don't see what the big hubub is about. I've got the Canon 50mm. I've never
experienced flare.
I'm not pointing my lens directly into the sun mind you.
I have, however, ex
Overpriced yes.
On the other hand.. a pre-production (or possibly production) model was
supplied for a preview to Phil Askey and he'll post a preview later today
(according to his site). When did Pentax say the *ist-D was going to be
available again ?
I'm beginning to think that the *ist-D is goi
Giving a pre production model to a Pentaxian vs giving a pre production
model to a Web or Magazine reviewer are two different things.
In order for Pentax to prove itself as "in the game" they have to allow
someone reputable from outside our little enclave to review or preview the
camera. Without
I know this has probably been around a few times but I'm eyeing some
equipment from Adorama and I'd like to know how they are with their used
department. Has anyone bought used from Adorama? Has anyone in Canada
bought used from Adorama?
Curious,
Dave
Even if the *ist D is in the price range of the 10D (not "D10"), it won't
make too much of a difference.
Canon already has a "Rebel D" in the works.
They are announcing it sometime this fall.
A "consumer" based DSLR with a smaller feature set and not as robust a body
as the 10D.
Price?
$800 USD Str
What did I miss?
*ist-D release dates?
Dave
Left coast was.. well.. left :)
I miss that weather already - here's so muggy :(
Anyway, we'll see what turns out of the pics I snapped while out there.
Month and a half to the *ist-D huh.. we'll see.
My condolences to Dave Brooks - I've got 2 critters here that missed me tons
while I was gone.
Isn't this statement redundant? :-)
Cheers,
Dave
> -Original Message-
> From: Alin Flaider [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, July 18, 2003 7:55 AM
> To: whickersworld
> Subject: Re: OT: BLIAR, was Re: I'm Back
>
>
>
> a truly rotten, totally
> corrupted political class.
Vivitar 283.
It's reliable
It's a workhorse
and you don't need any TTL functionality to get great looking photos with
it.
It'll probably dwarf the MX and the ME Super but it's powerful enough to do
the job.
I use mine with a lumiquest pocket bouncer and it has yet to fail me.
Cheers
Dave
>
Way to go Brendan; now, what did you use for it?
I remember the phone call for the wide angle but all I have is the normal
lens.. so now I'm curious :)
Dave
> -Original Message-
> From: Brendan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, July 26, 2003 5:42 PM
> To: Pentax
> Subject: WOOOH
A Canon L 16-35 lens is about $1300 USD.
That's 2.8 throughout.
Compare the quality to anything close to what Pentax offers.
The closest item is a 17-28 3.5-4.5 zoom - which is $435 USD - and slower
and not as wide a range.
Or if you want to compare a similar "pro" Pentax lens, the closest they can
ces on similar deals.
>
> Doug
>
> On Tuesday, July 29, 2003, at 08:49 PM, David Chang-Sang wrote:
>
> > A Canon L 16-35 lens is about $1300 USD.
> > That's 2.8 throughout.
> > Compare the quality to anything close to what Pentax offers.
> > The closest
I'm in.. I think.. as long as I still have a job :-)
Cheers
Dave
> -Original Message-
> From: frank theriault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, August 04, 2003 8:32 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: TOPDML in September?
>
>
> I should be around, depending on whether I'l
Let's keep in mind that this is a Pre-Production model and that Pentax did
not include any manuals to Phil Askey for review so he may have missed some
functionality.
On the plus side from what I've seen: excellent metering range; RAW mode;
size and weight; 200 ISO (makes the F4 lenses make more se
Small yes
but so are all the other Pentax SLRs - and unfortunately - it doesn't help
them in the marketplace.
I know we're all excieted about the *ist-D but let's remember to read the
full article before we go hog wild on the camera.
Waiting for the production model tests,
Dave
> -Original
I'm disappointed that no images have been shown at higher than ISO 200.
This makes me feel like there's nothing but trouble if you want to shoot at
a higher ISO. Again, I'm waiting for full production tests.
Someone else asked why ISO 200 rather than 100 or 50??
Perhaps because the CCD can't handl
Paul is absolutely correct.
Due dilligence in testing OS's and patches solves a lot of the problems.
"Latest" doesn't always mean "greatest".
Our office didn't get hit by the worm in a bad way (we've only seen 2
machines out of some 600 or more that got hit) for a couple reasons:
1) We still run m
Arrrgh..
Definitely a TOPDML before you go buddy!!!
Seems that change is in the air this year.. I too will be having to start
hunting for a new job soon as our company was taken over by another and the
big bulk of the biz including the IT staff are going to be let go.
2,500 in our head office down
Bob,
While most of what you say makes perfect sense; the responsibility to
maintain a PC is in the hands of the PC owner - whether it's updating an O/S
or AntiVirus Software or if it's updating RAM, new Hard Drive etc. when
necessary/warranted.
There are many technicians out there who could do th
t: RE: *ist-D official picture samples!
>
>
> On Sat, 9 Aug 2003, David Chang-Sang wrote:
> > I'm disappointed that no images have been shown at higher than ISO 200.
> > This makes me feel like there's nothing but trouble if you want to
> > shoot at a higher
It _IS_ a nasty beast isn't it.
We've had it going on at work all day - patching systems. Most are not
compromised due to the backward nature of our company (most desktops are
still running NT4 Workstation) so we're looking to lock down on the laptops
running XP and 2000. It's killing XP laptops
> http://pages.prodigy.net/graywolfphoto
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "David Chang-Sang" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Saturday, August 09, 2003 5:08 PM
> Subject: RE: *ist-D official picture samples!
>
>
>
Congrats Frank!! :)
Looks like the Knarf Quiz should have had "f) hunting for better airfares
and refunds online" :D
Cheers
Dave
> -Original Message-
> From: frank theriault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, March 15, 2005 10:27 PM
> To: PDML
> Subject: [pdml] OT: Perhaps There
B&H and Adorama are the two shops I visit when I'm in NYC.
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/images/map_r2_c2.gif is the map for locating B&H
http://www.adorama.com/catalog.tpl?op=contactus (no map for Adorama but
their information is on that page)
Adorama and B&H are more "midtown" locations. Please NO
Why is it that it's only FRANK that gets sightings in Toronto..
I NEVER see anyone (other than Frank... so I guess that counts.. or sort
of..) ;) when I'm out and about.
Sheesh...
Frustrated TO PDML member,
Dave
> -Original Message-
> From: frank theriault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent
You guys and girls can slay me after you post the links to photos ok? :D
I know this has been asked before; but since I do not yet have a limited
lens, and I seem to have money to burn, can I see some examples of limited
shots that are wide open from these lenses?
I'm more apt to want the 43mm an
_1.htm
>
> This one is from the 77 @ f4 and cropped:
>
> http://www.arach.net.au/~savage/PESO/peso_003.htm
>
> I have some from the 31 at home, but I can't get at them right now :-)
>
> Dave S
>
>
> On Apr 1, 2005 11:35 AM, David Chang-Sang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
I think this just about seals it.
After having seen Wendy's, Jens', David's, Tom's and the links provided by
Amita, I've decided to snag one or two of these lenses.
I can see myself using the 77mm for portraiture and perhaps the 43mm as a
"walk around standard".
The "Wide Angle Boy" in me yearns
> Exposed 108 frames, 'twas lotsa fun too! ;-)
>
> Don
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: David Chang-Sang [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Sent: Friday, April 01, 2005 6:29 PM
> > To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> > Subject: RE: Limiteds Q
Are they on the "Endangered Species List"? :)
Curious
Dave
> -Original Message-
> From: William Robb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, April 01, 2005 9:58 PM
> To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> Subject: [personal] Re: Limiteds Question :)
>
>
>
> - Original Message -
> Fro
Dave,
I'm almost positive I've seen some at Downtown Camera.
I'll have to check with the folks there tomorrow.
Cheers
Dave
> On Mon, 4 Apr 2005 11:59:13 US/Eastern, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Sorry for doing this on the lsit,but canowmail is
> down for abit an
Ok..
I called into Downtown camera - no go :(
They don't have the B&W disposables.
BUT
My happy go lucky assistant Rebecca was pleased to mention that you could
just shoot the colour film and then PRINT in B&W via the lab :) I've done
this and the results, while not equal to true B&W fi
This action is actually pretty good as well:
http://www.shanzcan.com/photoshop/Shanz_XP_2002.atn
The entire site is decent but that Cross Process action produces something
very close to the "real" thing imho.
Cheers
Dave
> -Original Message-
> From: Shel Belinkoff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTE
I've read that the Hoya R72 is still the filter of choice for digital IR but
of course this all depends on the camera and such.
I will be picking up one today I think (67mm) as long as I can get a step
down ring for my lenses :)
Cheers
Dave
> -Original Message-
> From: William Robb [mail
Looks like an old rangefinder lens - one of those old school lenses that
have the shutter in the lens itself.
That's my guess - what do I win if I'm correct? :-)
Cheers
Dave
> -Original Message-
> From: DagT [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Saturday, April 16, 2005 12:09 PM
> To: pentax
Oy..
yes...
1) How to deal with "harsh" lighting and B&W film - and please don't say
"don't shoot in direct sunlight" :-)
2) Metering landscapes (spot)
Those are a couple I can think of off the top of my sleepy-eyed head.
Cheers,
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Mike Johnston [mailto:[EMAIL
If that's the case..
Frank, I'll trade you one of your lives for my soon to arrive ME-F ?
sound fair ? :)
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, January 23, 2003 8:48 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: what a great place! - Can we help Brother Fr
I love lenses that come with their own metal case...
makes you feel like you're carrying around a thermonuclear device :)
Dave
-Original Message-
From: frank theriault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, January 24, 2003 6:45 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: What, no bidders?
http
For those not aware of it.. or if you're having problems on some of your
shopping sites (or other sites for that matter)
http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=03/01/25/1245206&mode=thread&tid=109
Cheers,
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Waterson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday,
Awww..
come on..
JCO's got enough gear already ;-)
What a deal though.. if only I hadn't been snapping nudes at the time..
Cheers,
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Peter Alling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, January 25, 2003 11:34 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: 100mm/2.8 M on
Steve..
FONG
Subject:fs non ebay pentax stuff
Date: Sun, 26 Jan 2003 23:28:42 +1030
From:"pentaxer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Newsgroups:rec.photo.marketplace.35mm
pentax lx-good condition-recent cla- $400
pentax zx-10 with pentax 28-200mm $300 mint
Tokina atx pro 28-70mm 2.6-2.8 $250 mint
Tamron 90mm
heh..
I can hang for an hour or two.. :)
Do we go for standard fare or dim sum?
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Jeff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Tuesday, January 28, 2003 7:06 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: TPDML?
frank theriault wrote:
> Guys, guys, guys!
>
> You're clearl
EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: TPDML?
This place don't do dim sum. They just bring big plates full of food, and
you
spoon whatever ya want on your plate or in your bowl, or whatever...
-frank
David Chang-Sang wrote:
> heh..
>
> I can hang for an hour or two.. :)
> Do we go for st
I'm back :)
Dave
Bahahahahaha :)
Finally got the ME-F
the 50mm 1.4 is so nice on it :)
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Brendan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Friday, February 14, 2003 8:12 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Test
Run hide he's back :D
--- David Chang-Sang <[EMAIL PROTECTED
The Bronica 645RF always seemed like a nice cam..
I'm interested to hear about it too..
Cheers,
Dave
-Original Message-
From: David Brooks [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Saturday, February 15, 2003 8:47 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: This week's SMP: The Bronica RF
I'm very in
PM
> DCS> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> DCS> Subject: Re: RE: This week's SMP: The Bronica RF
>
> DCS> Oh Oh.Another brand switch David
>
> DCS> Dave
> DCS> Begin Original Message
>
> DCS> From: "David Chang-Sang" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]&
Also remember price..
the 1280 in Canada is running around $680 CDN
the 2200 is about $975 CDN
$300 CDN could buy a nice used SMC Pentax 24mm :-)
Cheers,
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Paul Stenquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Sunday, February 16, 2003 12:18 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
I've heard the same Collin..
that KEH has GOOD to EXCELLENT rep in how they rate their items.. far better
than how B&H (or so I've heard) rate their used items.
Cheers,
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Collin Brendemuehl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 7:19 PM
To
Best one I've found.. and it worked both ways sinc I the seller/buyer and
they the purchaser/sellers were in Canada was to allow them to DEPOSIT funds
directly to my bank account.
Yes.. I know.. it's a hazard.. You don't have to tell me about it as I
worked in a bank for 11 years and I still have
BT
Not if it's an international purchase.
Many times, even with the international USPS money orders, there were/have
been fraud alerts at banks and as such Canadian Banks wouldn't accept any
USPS money orders. Even now, Canadian sellers have to specifically state
that the US buyers should pay
Oh ..
I agree that they'd have to be dumb :)
but the problem is, I've received USPS money orders (green in color) even
AFTER stating that we need the pink colored ones. I figured by discussing
color and not "international vs national" that it would be easier but alas I
was wrong. In rural towns t
There's a guy that sells on Photo Net regularly.. out of Hong Kong that does
that.
Offers a 4% cash discount if you send him a money order vs wiring/paypal.
Cheers,
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Paul Franklin Stregevsky [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Thursday, February 20, 2003 11:12 PM
Oh how I wish it was THAT easy :-)
Mind you.. I do plan on heading to B&H later this year to pick up a lens and
some accesories that would cost me dearly up here in the PRC (Peoples
Republic Of Canada) ;-)
Cheers,
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Paul Stenquist [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sen
Pentax probably COULD have made a lens similar to the Canon's non "L" glass
zoom but that would have probably sucked up resources that were used to make
the *istD.
Not to mention that they did say that they were going to be releasing some
newer lenses in the Fall for the DSLR.
Cheers,
Dave
View
Sad thing is..
almost every lens flares - and there are ways to avoid flare - the 20-35
Canon offering is probably better than the Vivitar 19mm I had for K mount
and I had no problems using the Vivitar even though everyone whined about
flare. I think if you're careful in how you take the image, yo
Hold on with the "improvement" in AF.
The 10D uses basically the same AF sensor array and 7 point autofocus system
that the Elan 7 does.
The Elan 7 does not have an infrared AF assist light.
In low light situations, without the dedicated 420EX flash (which does have
an AF assist lamp), the Elan7 ca
SPeaking of Loupes..
I too am in the market for one.
I want to know a couple things though -
I want to view the negs and chromes but I don't have a light table.
I know I should get one (it's on my "need/want" list) but what I want to
know is, if I use contact sheets from the negs, can I use the lo
Prototype only and we know what happens to some prototypes; they sometimes
don't make it to market - no specifications listed - no release dates
listed - looks nice but stating that you'd buy it is like every other
person wanting to run out and buy the *ist D sight unseen.
If you do go for the Ol
Pentax has to be more aggressive in their pricing of the *ist D.
If $1600 is the list price and street is about $1300 as noted here; people
are apt to choose the 10D as the Canon system is now in its 3rd generation
(D30, D60 now 10D) where as the Pentax is first generation.
Pentax must be as agres
Hi Dave,
I've used it many times. It, in my opinion, beats XP2 hands down. It is
the finest C-41 B&W film out there but it is expensive (at least up here in
Canada). Most people, I think, usually opt for XP2 or T400CN before
spending the extra dough on Portra 400 BW. If you can afford it, it's
Ok folks,
Here's the scenario.
I shot a number of baby pics about 3-4 months ago for a young mother and her
husband. I know them via her (the young mother's) mother-in-law.
I fired off about 24 color 6x6's and 36 B&W and 24 Color 35mm shots. I did
a lot because the kids were super fidgety - on
Collin..
tut tut tut...
you can NEVER have enough toys...
Never.. never I say
Booowahahahahahahahaa!!!
Insanely yours,
Dave
-Original Message-
From: collinb [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 11, 2003 8:36 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: The really difficult quest
What's that??
Someone's making a 14 MP DSLR with a 12-600 f1.2 zoom and an effective
motordrive of 36fps???
COOL
awww... but it's $300 US.. and we all know that $300 USD is
waaay too much for us lowly Canadians to afford..
C'est la vie...
Smirkingly
Dave
-Original Me
Depending on the flash and what you're shooting Dave; NPH is pretty gosh
darn good in my books - but I'm shooting mostly people. Portra NC would be
my back up. NPZ rules - but it's expensive to shoot.
Seeing as how it's going to be so gosh darn sunny.. I'm grabbing some chrome
film this morning a
Dave Dave Dave...
if you're going to use the F meter just for colour shots..
i'd be happy to take it off your hands :-)
B&W, Zone, and then figure out your film density.. get a densitometer and go
nutty a la Ansel :-)
Let's see some of these F meter shots :-)
Cheers,
Dave
-Original Message
Pal;
Pentax's current "flagship" - MZ-S - is, even by those on this list,
considered a failure.
Pentax's last decent model was the MZ-5n IMHO.
What's left?
MZ-L, MZ-6 etc. none of which are beyond advanced amateur. The same could
be said for Minolta's offerings outside of their nicely spec'd Maxx
Thanks for keeping politics off of the list...
Dave
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, March 17, 2003 7:27 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: THE FRENCH
I seem to recall the French doing you guys a lot of favours way back
in the 18th centu
stated that this year would be different; so far, it has been - let's hope
that it continues and Pentax will prove me, and all the others out there
hoping for something special, wrong.
Cheers,
Dave
-Original Message-
From: Keith Whaley [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, March 18, 20
Agreed -
but Specs do play a part. I wouldn't purchase an automobile on "looks alone"
(although many have) as that would be silly since I'm not made of . I
also wouldn't purchase an automobile without test driving it first.
The "whole package" has to be considered; and, as I often tell friend
Hmm..
Perhaps we should organize something then..
one really big honking Pentax PDML meet ?
Can we have any suggestions for a reasonably centralized location that has
inexpensive accomodation, great facilities, lots of shooting opportunities
and courteous residents?
I think this would be a great
It's not the central location I was hoping for (i.e. Toronto *smirk*) but it
seems that for one reason or another most folks wanna "do" Vegas.
I would suggest an early 2004 meeting as it would appear that the current
state of world affairs may have things a bit chilly at least till the end of
the
Heoo gents and ladies :)
After having lunch with Frank and David Brooks and Jeff I decided that I'd
come back to the list to see what's cooking.
I've got a question about my "new to me" k1000 - it's been a while since I
owned one and I'm almost a newbie again me thinks - but here's my que
I like this one Frank..
and love that vivitar 19mm..
the exposure is perfect imho.
Cheers
Dave
> -Original Message-
> From: frank theriault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Monday, January 03, 2005 6:46 PM
> To: PDML
> Subject: [pdml] PAW: In the Hall
>
>
> Now that the lab's open af
Way to go Frank :)
Told ya you'd like a fisheye :)
Let me know when I can borrow that 1.2 ;) I'm still waiting on my 1.4 from
down south.
Cheers
Dave
> -Original Message-
> From: frank theriault [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, January 04, 2005 8:24 PM
> To: PDML
> Subject: [pd
Seeing as how I have the looks ;)
I'm willing to provide Buddhist outlook on things.. mind you, I'd have to
come to our meetins devoid of any camera gear it's a material thing
after all :)
Cheers
Dave
> -Original Message-
> From: Jeff Tokayer [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesda
Seeing as how I've owned and still own a number of "That Brand's" cameras ;)
I can say that the A series is solid.
If memory serves me correctly the A series just enough of a little manual
control to grow into while still offering the usual "consumer" modes that
make it easy to use.
I wanted some
http://www.chang-sang.com/paw/
It's with the EOS-3.. I'm hoping to have some film back from the lab this
week that I can post next weeks PAW as a K1000 shot..
Cheers
Dave
My softbox (Photoflex 24"x36") folds up and stores neatly into a carrying
bag that came with the softbox - too bad the speed ring can't fold up though
:D
So basically the softbox is a bit longer than, yep, you guessed it, an
umbrella.
Cheers
Dave
> -Original Message-
> From: Don Sanders
It looked like a decent camera and I was eyeing it for about 5 seconds till
I saw the seller's feedback - there will be other MX's that I would rather
use than have sit on a shelf :)
Cheers
Dave
> -Original Message-
> From: Shel Belinkoff [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Wednesday, Janua
http://www.chang-sang.com/paw/
Coffee anyone? Details on my PAW page.
Cheers
Dave
t [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Friday, January 14, 2005 6:41 AM
> To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> Subject: [pdml] Re: PAW: Java
>
>
> Interesting shot. The minimal depth of field provides a different
> perspective on a fairly common subject. I like it.
> Paul
> On Jan 14,
Digital Holga is a lot of fun and always enjoyable but sometimes the effect
can be overdone; not yours mind you but if you do it to every single pic it
gets a bit tiresome :)
http://www.chang-sang.com/photo/lj/users/nexus/060105/crop040_holga.jpg
That's a link to a shot in which I used the photosh
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> Subject: RE: [pdml] Digital Holga
>
>
> Why don't you post the action so those who are interested can download it
> and see how it works?
>
> Shel
>
>
> > [Original Message]
> > From: David Chang-Sang <[EMAI
I don't know if this has been brought up recently but if it has... I
apologize
Well,
Maybe I haven't been paying that much attention to it but as of today my
local camera store raised their Ilford prices.
Fuji and Agfa are next (apparently) to jack theirs up by March 1.
An example of the increase
1 - 100 of 357 matches
Mail list logo
