I've put Delta rated at 1600 through Microphen and found the result
more than acceptable. It may be that 20C versus 24Celsius matters
also as I like more the outcome at lower temperature - longer
developing.
Servus, Alin
Frantisek wrote:
DGAJ>> But the main question I've got today co
A lifetime project that transcends nature photo and questions the
path of our species.
For the lucky ones around or travelling to NY, don't miss the
grandiose exhibition in NYC, open until June 6 (pier 54, West 13th St.).
The rest of us can get a glimpse in the March number of the Pho
Bob,
Hopefully I'll be able to experience the difference at some point in
the future. Right now it seems to me the images have enough drama
not to be further emphasized with these high contrasts. Maybe it's
due to the web translation but I think the amount of pure black and
white make
David wrote:
DS> 33%
DS> I need another drink.
Very healthy - further enough from both fundamentalist extremes.
Servus, Alin
Leon,
Coming from a 7 MP / electronic viewfinder camera his choice is
logical. These kind of users are not going to choose a lower MP
camera based on bigger/clearer viewfinder and better build. Canon
knows where to aim with its rebels. Pentax doesn't stand a chance
outside its users
There are some cameras with infrared capabilities, DSC V1 comes in
mind. It's not film but 4 MP is still better than video.
Servus, Alin
Cotty wrote:
C> We have a fairly cheap Video 8 digi camcorder that has an infrared light
C> on it and when set for IR capture, it's quite astonishing
Kenneth wrote:
KW> I personally know 3 Nationally prominent Pro Outdoor
KW> photographers. While they have been known to spend time perfecting
KW> an exceptional image after capture, their credo is to get it right
KW> in the camera at the time of capture.
Ken,
There must be the habit of s
Okay, so I like this place (B&H that is), people over there are very
knowledgeable in most every respect except for... Pentax. And just
to add my share to the speculation, camera makers of 2008 will be
making their own sensors too. Look up Canon for SLR and Sanyo for
p&s, Nikon aims to m
Frantisek,
After getting back from a London-NY-Charlotte trip with not many
photo oportunities, I found on the only Provia 100F that I managed
to take some pictures on - lots of gray spots liberally sprinkled
over the blue skies. Since this is the only time it happened I can
only rela
Christian wrote:
CL> Example shots on the Pentax Japan website have been unorthodox before (Optio
CL> 33L: two samples in digital filter mode, only one in normal mode) - but they
CL> have always been realistic in showing what images the camera is able to
CL> produce. I hope it is the same with th
Dave,
f/8 with 8-10 seconds will do.
Or you can put the SP in auto compensate -3 stops.
Good luck with the weather, I'm going for the Mars - Moon shot too.
Servus, Alin
brooksdj wrote:
bcin> I have a few frames of Portra 400NC left in the Super Program and thought
bcin> i'd try a sky
Don wrote:
DEDFW> ... brandy and if you're out for more than a few days -
DEDFW> antibiotics and vodka.
Just don't take them both at once unless you want to brag about how
you survived despite any of them... ;o)
Servus, Alin
Bob Walkden wrote:
BW> Here's what I take:
...
BW> coil of rope
:o)
Actually the coil of 40 meters of 8mm rope and a carabineer always
sit at the bottom of may rucksack even if no climbing is in the
collimator. Quite a few benefited from it over the years...
BW> torch
May I sugge
John wrote:
JF> but I seem to recall that the 80-320 was well received when it was
JF> first released, so I'm thinking of trying one with the *ist-D
John, considering the 60 lpmm requirement of the *ist d sensor,
the 80-320 will behave remarkably well between 80 and 135, still
well at 20
John wrote:
JF> I believe that our new vehicle (a Mini Cooper) has the code-change feature.
JF> Our salescritter certainly said it had it, but who trusts auto sales guys?
So I was told of my new Peugeot 206. Months later when I had the
time to go through the manuals, I found out much to my
Frank, have you tried cleaning the electrical contacts, both on
camera and the lens? [The aperture value is transmitted strictly via
digital protocol].
Servus,Alin
Frank wrote:
FW> recently my FA* 24mm is behaving strangely on my MZ-5N. At the largest aperture
FW> (aperture priority
Er... I hate to say it, but resolution-wise the *ist d appears to be
no match to the Canons. It barely equals the D100. But this is
hardly any surprise.
Servus, Alin
Harold wrote:
HO> In addition Phil Askey (DPReview) who appears to be in the process of
HO> assessing the camera has als
Heiko, some image samples with noise reduction off, at 200 and
1600 ASA, also some raw samples...
Servus, Alin
Heiko wrote:
HH> I will have the possibility to handle a *istD at the weekend. If I shall
HH> try soemthing for you, then tell me. I will take some FA-lenses with me,
HH> a
Trevor wrote:
TB> I figured that if I left the MZ60 on smiley green and mounted on a
TB> tripod,
TB> The pentax would work out it's own settings.
TB> Is this correct?
Not necessarily, Trevor. Too much light and the meter might
underexpose. In normal illumination, with shaded areas prevaili
Actually I met several picturesque coach drivers. They certainly
displayed a conductor's sobriety. Anyone around? ;o)
Servus,Alin
Chris wrote:
CS> Bus or Tram (at least in Europe) :-)
>> "Bill Owens" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> >Musical type conductor? If so, where.
>>
>> And
Paul wrote:
PD> that reminds me that the min. focus disctance at 1.7m makes the lens partly
PD> useless. I often get much closer than that.
Sorry to disapoint you, the K 135/2.5 you narrowed your search to is
limited to 1.5 m (enough for portraits if you ask me, but tastes may
vary). To get
Arnold wrote:
AS> comparable. In their test reports they clearly state that the results
AS> for lenses of different speeds cannot be compared directly.
Really Arnold, then what good are these results for!? After all,
people are more likely to decide between different lenses of the
same bran
Alan wrote:
>>Can it use the IR beam of the inner flash (or an external dedicated flash)
>>as a focus aid even if I don't intent to use the flash?
AC> You must use AF500FTZ then, the built-in flash won't do that. Don't know
AC> about AF360FGZ.
Affirmative. The projected pattern area is large
Bill wrote:
>> Pentax SF10
WR> I have no idea if the AF360FGZ is compatable with that camera or not. At
WR> some point, Pentax went with full digital flash to camera communication, so
According to the 360FGZ manual it is. It sports all modes except for
high speed sync and wireless control, j
Bo-Ming,
You might want to try the contrast control function with one 360FGZ
wireless unit, if you need that uniform lighting in depth. Also, I
don't know what camera you are using, but note that MZ-S and later
bodies do a much better job of flash metering with their P-TTL mode.
Former
Mark wrote:
MR> Hmm. At least one source I've seen regarded one black line and one white
MR> line as a "pair".
I concur. A line pair per mm is just that, a black and a white line.
In digital terms it corresponds to 2 pixels.
Servus, Alin
Hi Ryan, no Sigma 28-70/2.8 here, but I have used the flash with
various lenses and in all ways. Comments below.
Ryan wrote:
R> Also, sometimes when I use the popup flash on the mz5n with the Sigma Ex
R> 28-70 2.8 (without the petal lens hood), I get a semi-circle shadow at the
R> bottom of t
Bojidar wrote:
>> You also mention in the site that the 360FTZ can do slave flash. Did
>> you mean the 330FTZ or the 360FGZ?
BD> I don't think that the 330 FTZ can, but I do not own the 360 either, so
BD> I am not totally sure.
The 360FGZ can act as a slave both in wireless control or as a plai
I have no doubt the market pressure had no influence on Pentax
decision to cut the backwards mount compatibility. Mechanical
aperture coupler and corresponding firmware were nothing new,
P could have inherited the solutions from previous bodies just as
they did with various other common
John wrote:
JF> It's funny how all the tirades seem to be aimed at the newer
JF> bodies, and not at the new FAJ lenses.
Actually they had their share (don't know if you were here by then).
People still find it hard to believe FAJ is the future - maybe
because the first incarnations are chea
Chris wrote:
CB> Like any other huge change
CB> designed to slip in under the radar and avoid pissing off tons of people
CB> at once, the disappearance of the aperture ring will be slow, subtle, and
CB> almost inevitable.
Pentax in their wisdom waited for a long time for an occasion to
drasti
Paul wrote:
PD>
PD> From all the info I have gathered from you all and the web I'm still pretty
PD> confused as to what zoom within say 24-105 is a good one. Do I really need
PD> to go Pentax or,
Paul, do you shoot into the sun or fancy backlights? In this case go
for SMC. Tokina'
Paul wrote:
PD>
PD> From all the info I have gathered from you all and the web I'm still pretty
PD> confused as to what zoom within say 24-105 is a good one. Do I really need
PD> to go Pentax or,
Paul, do you shoot into the sun or fancy backlights? In this case go
for SMC. Tokina
Hi Jostein, I hope you have a not too cold night out there and a
nice trek tomorrow (not that I expect you to read much of the
pdml flow through a cell phone).
BTW, you might want to try a GPRS connection rather than SMS. It's
faster, cheaper and you're always on line. And you may even
Hi Thomas,
I haven't noticed the multisegment reading to adjust with the focus
distance. As for the flash, perhaps the P-TTL mode may consider the
distance but it's not likely for the older plain TTL flash mode. For
instance, the displayed range by the flash unit does not change with
Rüdiger wrote:
RN> Will there be a replacement of the 2.8/80-200 ???
FAJ* 80-200/2.8 ? :oT
Servus, Alin
Bill wrote:
BO> The latest issue arrived yesterday with a very thorough review of the film
BO> *ist. According to them, it's a very nice camera for the money.
The key word is indeed "for the money".
To quote a friend: "I peeked at the corners of the viewfinder and
there it was a jumbel of
Pentax published:
> "Its simple, functional design, coupled with the elimination of an
> aperture ring, considerably improves the camera's operability."
Rob wrote:
RB> So the elimination of the aperture lens actually improves operation?
Yeah, along this line we can expect the next step to be
Johan wrote:
JUW> Hmmm, didn't know that. What is a good picture to check the lens quality ?
Personally I would prefer a medium tone, fine shade, high detail
image. Your iguana in diffuse light would do fine. I learned some
time ago that saturation and high contrast tend to mask the
diffe
Boris wrote:
BL> 1. What else can go wrong with MZ-5n after 5 years of moderate use?
Don't know really. In more than five years mine has seen some
climbing and skiing, went from -20 to almost 50 degrees, it even
held up to cave moisture and sea splashes and still has to let me
down. But I
Beautiful pictures... btw, his 50mm (85 ?) must be one heck of a
lens - I haven't noticed any trace of comma aberration towards the
edges. Possibly the pics are too small for it to show up. However,
my FA 50/1.4 at 1.4 displays huge UFOs in the corners...
Servus, Alin
DagT wrote:
dc
Amita, I can confirm that Optima II 100 was quite saturated in
yellow and red, and even HDC+ 100 showed some red affinities. ;o)
However, Agfa pretends it changed the emulsion in the new Optima
Prestige - actually in their entire negative film line. The so
called Eye Vision technology is
Lon wrote:
LW> What does the rumour mill say about the "next" istD?
LW> Will it use K/M lenses? Hell, I can wait
Of course there's always the possibility of a higher end *istd with
a corresponding price tag for full K/M compatibility. Maybe
something along the MZ-S approach.
But I s
edwin wrote:
ein> Basing a digital on the middle and bottom-of-the-line cameras means
ein> that you don't get all the features that might be nice. A $20 or
ein> whatever feature is a trivial addition to a $1700 digital but probably a
ein> noticeable addition to the $200-$300 film camera it i
Paul wrote:
PS> But Peugeot has a quality problem. Pentax does not.
I wouldn't know as I never had issues with either. Admittedly I keep
both in great shape and ready for launch. Come to think of it, it's
remarkable how well they team together when it comes to get at the
right time and sp
Ryan wrote:
RL> Btw, being Peugeois, you must have watched Taxi and Taxi 2? Think it was Luc
RL> Besson.. hilarious French Fry Peugeots taking potshots at them Germ Mercs.
RL> Good veg out movies..
Hi Ryan,
Actually I'll pick up the Taxi 2 to cheer up the rainy day that
glooms tomorrow. If
Pål wrote:
PJ> Large volume
PJ> DSLR is apparently limited for future Pentax DSLR's. My guess is
PJ> that the *ist D is a loss leader like all DSLR's and that Pentax
PJ> currently are not willing to buy market share. The *istD function
PJ> is probably only to make Pentax present in the DSLR fiel
Alan wrote:
AC> I don't think there is subsititute for RVP, negative or slide. Your best
AC> hope would be Agfa Ultra 100.
Uh, I just got to see my first Ultra 100 test results and they are
not very encouraging to say the least.
I took pictures of a variety of subjects, including scenics
Rob wrote:
RS> as an aliasing artifact on the high contrast boarder. It looks like it may be a
RS> combination of adjacent pixel spill (due to the high contrast transition) and
RS> the lens aberrations.
The 100/2.8 Macro being too contrasty for the sensor? Maybe that's
all there is about FAJ
Pål wrote:
PJ> Not very likely I'm afraid. According to Pentax sources at this
PJ> part of the world, out of 14 000 DSLR sold about 40 will be *ist
PJ> D's. About 13 960 are Nikon or Canon models.
That accounts then to what? ... 500 units per month? Are they hand
assembled!? Then perhaps the
The common parts are also the new developments: AF and meter subsytems,
mount (or lack of :oT). Enough shared R&D to justify a film sibling
for *istd.
Servus, Alin
Bill wrote:
WR> The two chassis are not the same size, and share no common parts. What we
WR> are seeing is a "family rese
Hi Ryan,
Now how nice would you expect me to be after that ruthless
rugby lesson we got from you Aussies right at Brisbane!
;o)
I think it's not the pic per se, rather the technical
question marks: the saturation is there but there's also this
scarcity of shades that once ditched my
mishka wrote:
m> and saw the signs "speed limit strictly enforced", i realized new
m> york cops do have a sense of hunor.
You meant honour, right!?
;o)
Coming from a country struggling to rebuild its infrastructure, I
shouldn't have been too shocked by the state of NYC roads. Yet it
oft
mike wrote:
mw> ...and not something I want to meet on a dark night. I thought it was
mw> quite brave of the photographer to follow them.
Not necessarily. Wild boars living near human communities (feeding
from crops, etc.) are not that wild anymore. Rather shy, retreating
at humans approac
mike wrote:
mw> was approaching. Similarly, if you have been trying to find a nice
mw> place to give your kids a drink but some oik with a camera keeps
mw> following you..
Now I don't pretend I can think like a boar but first I would reckon
the oik's size, second I'd count the camera
Dave wrote:
DM> I also am very interested in this use of slave flash. I would have expected
DM> the TTL functions to operate normally on the camera for not only the onboard
DM> or external mounted flash but also for the slave flash. If you set the
DM> slave for less then you expect to need 1/1
Bruce wrote:
BD> You are basically correct if the popup flash is stronger than the
BD> slave and ambient isn't too strong. The problem is, that the reason
BD> to move the flash off camera is to make the main light not be direct.
BD> In your proposed approach, the popup becomes the main and the
B
Basically it's the same 3.3 MPixel with improved sensitivity and
dynamic range. And they "reverted" to microlenses in order to
achieve it. Maybe Kodak will do the same with their 14MP CMOS and
its catastrophic noise above 400 ASA. Too bad, I was hoping the
industry managed to overcome mi
They seem to imply it'll be available in other mounts as well.
A 18-50mm of just 245g could be of interest for d*isters.
It will be interesting to see how the reduced image circle lenses
will appear in the so called sports finder of the Sigma digital
slrs, as the viewfinder shows the en
Don wrote:
DEDFW> Well up here we have -35C with wind. What about that?
I wonder what modern Pentax can be operated (assuming it's
functional) at -50 real feeling !?
I managed to use mine, for short periods of time, at -20C, -30C rf.
But I suspect it's as far as it goes.
Servus, Al
Initially Foveon specified 3.3 MPix in the marketing papers. Later,
although it was obvious it delivered results at least as good as
6 MPix mosaic sensors, it was still classified among 3 MPix cameras
in commercial catalogues, tutorials, even reviews.
So it's the market and it's MPix bli
Herb wrote:
HC> in the US, there is wholesale replacement of film with digital projectors
HC> for commercial movie theaters.
What resolution would that be? I am concerned as the best commercial
(not industrial) digital projectors are a measly 2 MPixels, and in
my experience it lacks not jus
Sylwester, how precise is the SAFOX VIII in the light of previous
reports on how SAFOX IV and even VII produce slightly defocused
results with certain lenses (notably FA 50/1.4 not achieving
infinity). Did you feel you can improve the focus manually?
Servus, Alin
Sylwester wrote:
SP>
Lon wrote:
LW> What's this camera like to use?
Handled one. Not particularly impressed by the build quality,
especially along the other Optios.
LW> No viewfinder.. what's THAT like?
Horrible. I wasn't able to take a single unblurred shot at speeds I
can easily master with cameras wi
Mark,
Inspired move - beautiful sceneries! Did you use the flash mounted
on the camera for fill-in or did you hold it sideways (Dolly Sods
Dawn #3) ?
Servus, Alin
Christian wrote:
CS> Beautiful colors! I'm disappointed that we didn't get a show where I
CS> live.
Actually you shouldn't. The lower is the latitude where aurora can
be seen, the more deformed the earth magnetic field is and so the
higher the impact over communication, electrical grid
Rob wrote:
RS> I'm not convinced either however Leica have a well founded history of actually
RS> listening and servicing their customers.
Point to Leica and aim to Pentax. ;o)
Servus, Alin
Ryan wrote:
RL> I was just wondering if anyone else agrees with me that the new DA lenses
RL> seem like a bit of a backward move.
RL> ..
RL> I wonder how
RL> much resources this direction takes away from moving towards full frame
RL> (maybe Pentax isn't even considering it!).
Well Ryan, I s
Hi Bruce,
Yes, how about the Pentax company...? ;o) Well, the paradox is that
Pentax has little company and that may be very well their only
excuse.
I don't think that Fuji (or Kodak for that matter) are players. They
lack a SLR tradition nor do they have a client base - so it's
no
Dario,
Don't take it as a disregard to digital posts bearing hard factual
data. I do appreciate your comparisons between dslrs. I specified
digital "rant" and expressed my regret for having interesting but
too "classic" topics silenced by the digital noise. To which I did
contribute my
It seems a correction is in order. I just learned the
hummingbird-moth is a tough living being, capable of surviving the
winter as an adult, in a semi-hibernation state. It's also migrant
reaching quite high in the mountains. So it doesn't look anymore to
me as a "naturalized" species.
Peter, with digital images, you need to specifically ask for "no
processing" and "no fill in" (the last if your images are already
dimensioned according to the print size and printer resolution).
I had a similar experience with a Fuji Frontier lab and the operator
emphasized I should hav
Second part is not just to you... ;o)
http://ro.umt.com/alin/xmas/MerryXPentax.jpg
Servus, Alin
To those that came across it:
Does it make any difference if you send 48 bit data to commercial
laser printers like Fuji Frontier and the like? Are these printers
capable to represent the additional tones the 48 bit image provides
over a 24 bit one? And if not, is there any difference in
Shel,
This seems like a scanner software job rather than PS. Most scanning
applications have some means of storing the correction settings so
that it can then be applied on a batch job.
In order to do it in the post-processing phase you still need to
firstly insure that you scanned
Well I did some research on the web and while no manufacturer gives
detailed info, it is apparent that all commercial digital printers
are quite limited machines, built around now obsolete processors
(PII 150 MHz in the Agfa case!). Now wonder it can't handle large,
48bit tiffs. Even if
keller.schaefer wrote:
ks> I still wonder, why they don't make those finders a bit larger. Would this
ks> really require a very large prism - or do the manufacturers just find it
ks> unimportant?
I suspect larger viewfinders are perfectly possible within the
current prism dimensions (the pris
Rob,
I remember when you did the same with your newly acquired Olympus.
By then I disliked the huge dof / nasty boke of the macro shots and
in general the video look. Now it definitely looks better. More
natural, more film like. Good luck with your *istd.
Servus, Alin
Rob wrote:
R
Bob,
I really don't see RSX II 100 as a "high saturation film". It may be
a bit more saturated than Provia 100F in the warm colors but
certainly lacks the "punch" of Velvia. On the contrary, the colours
look very natural and well balanced, it excels especially on the
skin rendering an
Frantisek,
I think it all revolves around one's view about beggars. I used to
pay attention, feel compassion, understand, etc. At some point I
even bought them a meal - once for a freezing adult, many times for
children. Until I realized how large is the scale of organized,
syndicat
True, should P ever come up with IS body, it's very likely IS will
require AF lenses relaying focal length and distance info.
Speaking of Pentax capabilities, optical Image Stabilization is
mainstream nowadays. At least 5 companies offer it in one form or
another, to list Canon, Nikon,
Same experience here, the last frame is almost always compromised.
Add to this you need to be very careful with dust and emulsion bits
that may get into the light brush and scratch the film. Also had
once problems with faulty DX contacts on reusable cartridges that
ruined several exposur
Mmmm, nature landscape in high key. Definitely one of the best
images I've seen lately. Congratulations for originality and the
powerful story that one can build upon.
Servus, Alin
Kenneth wrote:
KW> Check out
KW> http://mypeoplepc.com/members/kwaller/offwallphoto/id2.html
KW> Taken w
Dario,
I think you are overreacting. Take a break and get back. I only
manage to read a small part of the pdml but your messages are always
among those few.
Servus, Alin
Dario wrote:
DB> Steve Jolly wrote:
>> Get out there and take some fantastic photos. :-)
DB> There are a few am
APS sensors are currently the minimum resistance route. Hopefully
when the digital dust settles and the sales are plummeting the
manufacturers are forced to come up with real value for money, that
being full frame DSLRs. Even P keeps its options open with a couple
of full frame "digital"
Thanks, it does answer some questions.
So it lacks the bargraph in viewfinder but at least it displays
numerically the difference from metered exposure, which makes the
manual mode almost useable.
Looking in the viewfinder display again, the area wasted with
program mode icons and
The download is huge and yet the images are only 4 MPixel. How
disappointing.
Servus, Alin
Alan wrote:
AC> http://www.slrclub.com/bbs/vx2.php?id=pentax_forum&no=6274
The bargraph is extremely useful in the viewfinder as an intuitive
way of assessing the exposure range of the scene (in manual mode,
coupled with spot meter). I really don't see its place on the back
LCD as it doesn't sport live preview anyway.
Servus, Alin
Sylwester wrote:
SP> I'd s
G> There is! LCD Panel on top shows the metering mode (page 22 in
G> manual).
Thanks, I'm glad I skipped this one.
Still, I find the metering mode buried too deep in the menus to be
really useable. The same goes with flash compensation: commonly used
functions that should be readily acces
Don,
The lens mount doesn't ground the AF pin on the body mount (the
closest from the AF shaft).
Servus, Alin
Don wrote:
DS> I put a cheap Vivitar 28/2.8 MF M type lens on the D this
DS> morning to see what the results would be.
DS> Though it's certainly not a sharp lens the results w
Just to point that absence of the dedicated AF button can be
supplanted by programming the OK button to act as focussing button.
The same button can also be set to suspend AF while manually
focussing (with lenses sporting quick shift focus).
Servus, Alin
Patrick,
The manual power setting is relative to the flash maximum output
power.
You cannot set multiple 500FTZ to different power levels in TTL
operation, only in manual. To achieve that you need to use the more
recent 360FGZ (with cameras that support the P-TTL mode) and dial
speci
With the advent of multithreading programming the old paradigm of
yielding control to OS became obsolete. The problem is that a very
processor intensive worker thread holds the processor up to 100%
load and makes the entire system especially the low priority user
interface low responsive
The MZ-S is the body that introudced the P-TTL.
You should dismiss 500FTZ too fast: if contrast control doesn't
satisfy you (the manual has a pretty good explanation of it) and the
subject is rather static, you can always set up manually the flashes
based on the working aperture, distanc
I wrote:
AF> You should dismiss 500FTZ too fast:
Of course I meant you shouldn't...
Servus, Alin
KK> Does the 500 feature wireless?
Sort of. Slave mode, no communication to the camera; does manual and
auto as slave.
Servus, Alin
Patrick,
It seems like the contrast control mode is what you're looking for.
Set the flash on the bracket to contrast control mode and make sure
it bounces in a reflector. This flash will deliver two thirds of the
light which makes up for quite a balanced setup.
I used 360FGZ with 20
Kostas wrote:
KK> Does the 500 feature Auto? I don't think so.
True, it does not. I was thinking to my 360FGZ when I wrote that. A
truly versatile flash.
Servus, Alin
___
Connex scaneaza automat toate mesajele impotriva
O has to be handled by one processor, no matter how many you
HC> have, and updating the GUI counts as I/O.
HC> Herb...
HC> - Original Message -----
HC> From: "Alin Flaider" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
HC> To: "Herb Chong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
HC> Se
Scott,
You'll find the MZ-5N struggles with moving subjects in general and
high contrasts doesn't help at all. I shot alpine ski with it and
the FA 80-320 and ended up with perfectly focused images all taken
one second at least after pressing the shutter release. :o( Try to
use onl
1 - 100 of 581 matches
Mail list logo