Re: peso plumeau

Thanks. From the viewpoint of a cat it's normal because they look down on us. I'm a humble servant for these aristocats. Toine On 6/29/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > In a message dated 6/4/2007 6:44:51 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time, > [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > That's one very c

Re: Peso Peff's Mill

Thanks Marnie. I took about 20 shots, mostly from one angle, various focal lengths, as there was a lot of junk at the sides. Different exposures with and with out the filter. Seems the SFW did not save as i had adjusted the shot. It was converted in LR 1.1. Wonder if that had anything to do with

Re: Another computer related problem

I was told by Bill, and probably Mark, not 100% sure, that when i set up the spyder to disable adobe gamma. I went into msconfig and unchecked the boxes for that. Seems to work as my colour prints fom the epson 2400 are just fine. Dave On 6/27/07, cbwaters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > No, I'm no

Re: Wedding lens?

Thanks, my usual lens are MF 50/1.4 and 135/3.5 ... not very good for reportages and weddings :) Another option will be F28/2.8, no zoom but at least fast prime. And AutoFocus. G Paul Stenquist wrote: > Yes, the DA 16-45 is very good. I shot a wedding recently and used > just the DA 16-45 a

9999 + 1

What happens when camera reaches image counts, what next? ;) -- new pictures once and again -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Re: 9999 + 1

On 29/06/07, Roman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What happens when camera reaches image counts, what next? 0 -- Rob Studdert HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA Tel +61-2-9554-4110 UTC(GMT) +10 Hours [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://picasaweb.google.com/distudio/PESO http://home.swiftdsl.com.au/~distudio//publicat

Re: 9999 + 1

On 6/29/07, Roman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > What happens when camera reaches image counts, what next? > > ;) -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Permits may soon be required to shoot in NYC

City May Seek Permit and Insurance for Many Kinds of Public Photography http://www.nytimes.com/2007/06/29/nyregion/29camera.html?ei=5090&en=71135caff6fefe6a&ex=1340769600&partner=rssuserland&emc=rss&pagewanted=print "New rules being considered by the Mayor's Office of Film, Theater and Broadcasti

Re: Wedding lens?

Hi! I usually have a short zoom (28-70mm range) and a telephoto prime with a big aperture to shoot with available light (usually my 135/2.5). The short zoom is for group and close quarter shots; the telephoto are for the ceremony since I usually avoid going on the altar or stage area of the churc

Re: Permits may soon be required to shoot in NYC

This suggested legislation is in response to pros shooting ads and editorial without permits. It happens a lot in New York and sometimes causes problems with traffic and/or crowds. I doubt that a wandering group of PDMLers would experience any problems. Paul -- Original message

Re: Permits may soon be required to shoot in NYC

- Original Message - From: Subject: Re: Permits may soon be required to shoot in NYC > This suggested legislation is in response to pros shooting ads and > editorial without permits. It happens a lot in New York and sometimes > causes problems with traffic and/or crowds. I doubt that

Re: Another computer related problem

- Original Message - From: "David J Brooks" Subject: Re: Another computer related problem >I was told by Bill, and probably Mark, not 100% sure, that when i set > up the spyder to disable adobe gamma. I went into msconfig and > unchecked the boxes for that. > > Seems to work as my colou

Re: Permits may soon be required to shoot in NYC

- Original Message - From: "Digital Image Studio" Subject: Re: Permits may soon be required to shoot in NYC > So the sky is or isn't falling? ;-) In some parts of North America, it is definitely getting closer to the ground... William Robb -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PD

Re: Permits may soon be required to shoot in NYC

[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: >This suggested legislation is in response to pros shooting ads and >editorial without permits. It happens a lot in New York and sometimes >causes problems with traffic and/or crowds. I doubt that a wandering >group of PDMLers would experience any problems. Perhaps not.

Re: Permits may soon be required to shoot in NYC

On 29/06/07, William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This is another example of the creeping horseshit that is permeating > society, and another small freedom falling unnoticed by the wayside. > Soon, we won't have any small freedoms left. So the sky is or isn't falling? ;-) -- Rob Studdert H

Re: antivirus discussion

Cotty wrote: > On 28/6/07, Godfrey DiGiorgi, discombobulated, unleashed: > >> I have a firewall in my base station that masks the internal network >>from external view without permission, John. Nothing gets to my >> system from the outside without my knowing it. > > Godders, can you recommend

Re: PEOW: Pie-Billed Grebe

> On 29/06/07, Jay Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I'll try to post the link to this image again as it appears to have >> been truncated making it unusable: >> >> http://i.pbase.com/ >> o6/87/63987/1/81261177.gmwcxIHL.PieBilledGrebe1062407.jpg >> >> Perhaps the filename was too long to fit

Re: Permits may soon be required to shoot in NYC

Did anyone mention that Mayor Bloomberg is, (if you'll pardon the expression), an a**h***. Digital Image Studio wrote: > City May Seek Permit and Insurance for Many Kinds of Public Photography > > http://www.nytimes.com/2007/06/29/nyregion/29camera.html?ei=5090&en=71135caff6fefe6a&ex=1340769600&p

Re: Permits may soon be required to shoot in NYC

- Original Message - From: "David Savage" Subject: Re: Permits may soon be required to shoot in NYC > > The sky isn't falling, the earth is rising. > > I blame global warming. > I blame the French. WW -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinf

Re: 9999 + 1

On Fri, Jun 29, 2007 at 03:56:47PM +0300, Roman wrote.. > What happens when camera reaches image counts, what next? 666 ? Nah, the count simply rolls over if the max counter value is exceeded. Wilko -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.

Re: Permits may soon be required to shoot in NYC

On 6/29/07, Digital Image Studio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 29/06/07, William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > This is another example of the creeping horseshit that is permeating > > society, and another small freedom falling unnoticed by the wayside. > > Soon, we won't have any small fr

Re: Permits may soon be required to shoot in NYC

On Fri, Jun 29, 2007 at 07:50:43AM -0600, William Robb wrote.. > > - Original Message - > From: > Subject: Re: Permits may soon be required to shoot in NYC > > > > This suggested legislation is in response to pros shooting ads and > > editorial without permits. It happens a lot in New

Re: antivirus discussion

On Jun 29, 2007, at 9:09, Adam Maas wrote: > Cotty wrote: >> On 28/6/07, Godfrey DiGiorgi, discombobulated, unleashed: >> >>> I have a firewall in my base station that masks the internal network >>> from external view without permission, John. Nothing gets to my >>> system from the outside without

Re: PEOW: Pie-Billed Grebe

I'll try to post the link to this image again as it appears to have been truncated making it unusable: http://i.pbase.com/ o6/87/63987/1/81261177.gmwcxIHL.PieBilledGrebe1062407.jpg Perhaps the filename was too long to fit on a single line. Sorry for the inconvenience. JayT -- PDML Pentax

Re: PEOW: Pie-Billed Grebe

On 29/06/07, Jay Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'll try to post the link to this image again as it appears to have > been truncated making it unusable: > > http://i.pbase.com/ > o6/87/63987/1/81261177.gmwcxIHL.PieBilledGrebe1062407.jpg > > Perhaps the filename was too long to fit on a single

Re: Permits may soon be required to shoot in NYC

- Original Message - From: "Wilko Bulte" Subject: Re: Permits may soon be required to shoot in NYC > You can still seek asylum in Europe. I've been shooting, tripod and all, > lots of public buildings in Berlin, even inside the main trainstation, > federal buildings etc. Nobody will

Re: Permits may soon be required to shoot in NYC

William Robb wrote: > - Original Message - > From: "David Savage" > Subject: Re: Permits may soon be required to shoot in NYC > > > >> The sky isn't falling, the earth is rising. >> >> I blame global warming. >> > > I blame the French. > WW > On this point you may be correct. France

Re: Permits may soon be required to shoot in NYC

Digital Image Studio wrote: >City May Seek Permit and Insurance for Many Kinds of Public Photography > >http://www.nytimes.com/2007/06/29/nyregion/29camera.html?ei=5090&en=71135caff6fefe6a&ex=1340769600&partner=rssuserland&emc=rss&pagewanted=print > >"New rules being considered by the Mayor's Offi

Re: Permits may soon be required to shoot in NYC

Just don't take photographs of any person without their permission in France... Wilko Bulte wrote: > On Fri, Jun 29, 2007 at 07:50:43AM -0600, William Robb wrote.. > >> - Original Message - >> From: >> Subject: Re: Permits may soon be required to shoot in NYC >> >> >> >>> This su

Re: Permits may soon be required to shoot in NYC

Not just that, but he's the worst sort of Authoritarian Nanny-Stater. A complete 'if it isn't specifically permitted it must be denied type'. I hope to hell he doesn't run for President. I'd rather have Nader or Trent Lott in power down there (and I despise both of those individuals). -Adam P.

Re: PESO: Another "street picture"

- Original Message - From: "Mat Maessen" Subject: Re: PESO: Another "street picture" >> http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/pictures/peso/walkinggirl.html >> >> Shot with the K10, and 77mm ltd. >> Cropped slightly from the full file. > > Very nice. I love the symmetry of the shot. Did you

Re: PESO: Another "street picture"

Subject: Re: PESO: Another "street picture" Thanks Dave, Marnie, Mark, Paul, Jack and Cotty for your kind words. Marnie, I redid the RAW conversion, it looks a little better now. William Robb -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

Re: Convert Raw to JPG

For example, what sort of circumstances? I guess if you were travelling with a printer and an image tank but not a computer, you could tweak an image and print it on the spot, but why would you have a printer and not a computer? Seems like frippery to me. Rick --- Thibouille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>

Re: Permits may soon be required to shoot in NYC

On 6/29/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This suggested legislation is in response to pros shooting ads and editorial > without permits. It happens a lot in New York and sometimes causes problems > with traffic and/or crowds. I doubt that a wandering group of PDMLers would > ex

Re: PESO: Another "street picture"

Nice. It looks as if she is aiming for the beige tiles. Dave On 6/28/07, William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/pictures/peso/walkinggirl.html > > Shot with the K10, and 77mm ltd. > Cropped slightly from the full file. > > William Robb > > -- > PDML Pentax-Disc

Re: Permits may soon be required to shoot in NYC

On Fri, Jun 29, 2007 at 10:57:14AM -0400, Adam Maas wrote.. > William Robb wrote: > > - Original Message - > > From: "David Savage" > > Subject: Re: Permits may soon be required to shoot in NYC > > > > > > > >> The sky isn't falling, the earth is rising. > >> > >> I blame global warmin

Re: Convert Raw to JPG

- Original Message - From: "Rick Womer" Subject: Re: Convert Raw to JPG > For example, what sort of circumstances? I guess if > you were travelling with a printer and an image tank > but not a computer, you could tweak an image and print > it on the spot, but why would you have a print

Re: Permits may soon be required to shoot in NYC

On Fri, Jun 29, 2007 at 09:24:54AM -0600, William Robb wrote.. > > - Original Message - > From: "Adam Maas" > Subject: Re: Permits may soon be required to shoot in NYC > > > > >> > >> I blame the French. > > > > > On this point you may be correct. France is at the forefront of ridicul

Re: Permits may soon be required to shoot in NYC

On Fri, Jun 29, 2007 at 10:49:02AM -0400, P. J. Alling wrote.. > Just don't take photographs of any person without their permission in > France... No idea, never tried. I'm into landscapes. By the way, I think that taking pictures of people is generally subject to their consent. Even if there i

New Scanner

Well, I'm now the owner of an Epson V700. I'm just using it mainly to scan B&W 6x7 negs. As a complete novice, I was just wondering if anyone could give me a few basic tips (other than don't slam your fingers in the cover). I'm using the SilverFast software that came with the scanner. TIA, Norm

Re: Permits may soon be required to shoot in NYC

- Original Message - From: "P. J. Alling" Subject: Re: Permits may soon be required to shoot in NYC > Just don't take photographs of any person without their permission in > France... Or buildings that are lit by artificial light, or have been built within the last half century or so.

Re: Another computer related problem

On 6/29/07, William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > - Original Message - > From: "David J Brooks" > Subject: Re: Another computer related problem > > > >I was told by Bill, and probably Mark, not 100% sure, that when i set > > up the spyder to disable adobe gamma. I went into msconfig a

Re: Permits may soon be required to shoot in NYC

- Original Message - From: "Adam Maas" Subject: Re: Permits may soon be required to shoot in NYC >> >> I blame the French. > > On this point you may be correct. France is at the forefront of ridiculous > restrictions on photographers, having essentially made Street Photography > ill

Re: Permits may soon be required to shoot in NYC

Wilko Bulte wrote: > On Fri, Jun 29, 2007 at 10:57:14AM -0400, Adam Maas wrote.. >> William Robb wrote: >>> - Original Message - >>> From: "David Savage" >>> Subject: Re: Permits may soon be required to shoot in NYC >>> >>> >>> The sky isn't falling, the earth is rising. I

Re: Permits may soon be required to shoot in NYC

And what is street photography but often capturing people's images without their permission, unless you intend to photograph an empty street. Wilko Bulte wrote: > On Fri, Jun 29, 2007 at 10:57:14AM -0400, Adam Maas wrote.. > >> William Robb wrote: >> >>> - Original Message - >>>

Re: PESO: Another "street picture"

- Original Message - From: "David J Brooks" Subject: Re: PESO: Another "street picture" > Nice. It looks as if she is aiming for the beige tiles. I tracked her for probably a hundred feet as she came down the walkway. She kept looking up at me, and was getting more and more self conci

Re: Permits may soon be required to shoot in NYC

On 6/29/07, William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > - Original Message - > From: "P. J. Alling" > Subject: Re: Permits may soon be required to shoot in NYC > > > > Just don't take photographs of any person without their permission in > > France... Or Quebec, oh wait, close enough. > >

Re: PEOW: Pie-Billed Grebe

Nice one, J ann Jay Taylor wrote: >I haven't been very active on the PDML lately, but I do try to browse >the archive and half way keep up with you all. >Here is a recent shot I thought was a nice capture > >http://i.pbase.com/ >o6/87/63987/1/81261177.gmwcxIHL.PieBilledGrebe1062407.jpg > >Eve

Re: PEOW: Pie-Billed Grebe

Vey nice! On 6/28/07, Jay Taylor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I haven't been very active on the PDML lately, but I do try to browse > the archive and half way keep up with you all. > Here is a recent shot I thought was a nice capture > > http://i.pbase.com/ > o6/87/63987/1/81261177.gmwcxIHL.PieBil

Re: Permits may soon be required to shoot in NYC

On Fri, Jun 29, 2007 at 05:51:49PM +0200, Wilko Bulte wrote: > > Well, if you watch the tele and see the British paparazzi haunt the > rich and famous there is a certain point to protecting people's right to > privacy. Why just pick on the British paparazzi? Have you seen the scrum around, say,

Re: Permits may soon be required to shoot in NYC

On Fri, Jun 29, 2007 at 08:43:58AM -0600, William Robb wrote: > > The problem with legislators is that they have to legislate things in order > to justify themselves. The big stuff has been taken care of for decades, so > now all that is left is parsing minutae. Indeed. An example, here in Cal

Re: Pop Photo

But I think they should have noted that Pentax and Tokina worked together in developing the 10 - 17 fisheye zoom http://www.popphoto.com/cameralenses/4245/editors-choice-2007-slr-lenses-tokina-10-17mm-f35-45-af-dx-fisheye-page6.html - It is unfortunate that the misinformation about the join

Re: PESO: Another "street picture"

On 6/28/07, William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/pictures/peso/walkinggirl.html > > Shot with the K10, and 77mm ltd. > Cropped slightly from the full file. > GREAT freaking shot! The timing was near-perfect. cheers, frank -- "Sharpness is a bourgeois conc

Re: PEOW: Pie-Billed Grebe

Jay Taylor wrote: > > http://i.pbase.com/ > o6/87/63987/1/81261177.gmwcxIHL.PieBilledGrebe1062407.jpg It's a nice shot, colors, detail, background are all really nice. One gripe: the bird is dead-center. If it was offset to one side or the other I think the composition would work better. >

Re: Permits may soon be required to shoot in NYC

On 6/29/07, Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 29/6/07, Adam Maas, discombobulated, unleashed: > > >On this point you may be correct. France is at the forefront of > >ridiculous restrictions on photographers, having essentially made Street > >Photography illegal. As far as I'm aware (and please

Re: Permits may soon be required to shoot in NYC

On Fri, Jun 29, 2007 at 12:49:24PM -0400, John Francis wrote.. > On Fri, Jun 29, 2007 at 05:51:49PM +0200, Wilko Bulte wrote: > > > > Well, if you watch the tele and see the British paparazzi haunt the > > rich and famous there is a certain point to protecting people's right to > > privacy. > >

Re: Permits may soon be required to shoot in NYC

On 29/6/07, Adam Maas, discombobulated, unleashed: >On this point you may be correct. France is at the forefront of >ridiculous restrictions on photographers, having essentially made Street >Photography illegal. Loada bollocks. I go to France. I shoot pics in the street. I don't get arrested. Th

Re: Permits may soon be required to shoot in NYC

On 6/29/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > This suggested legislation is in response to pros shooting ads and editorial > without permits. It happens a lot in New York and sometimes causes problems > with traffic and/or crowds. I doubt that a wandering group of PDMLers would > ex

GESO: The Celery Farm

I'm a lurker and should make more comments along the way... I put together a gallery of photo's that I'm debating on using to enter into a contest for the nature center. All comments and critiques are appreciated. http://picasaweb.google.com/ewkphoto/TheCeleryFarm -- Thanks! Ed -- PDML Penta

Re: Permits may soon be required to shoot in NYC

frank theriault wrote: > On 6/29/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> This suggested legislation is in response to pros shooting ads and editorial >> without permits. It happens a lot in New York and sometimes causes problems >> with traffic and/or crowds. I doubt that a wandering

Re: Permits may soon be required to shoot in NYC

On 6/29/07, Adam Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Wilko Bulte wrote: > > On Fri, Jun 29, 2007 at 10:57:14AM -0400, Adam Maas wrote.. I was watching something about that on, I believe, Slice the other day. Elliot Erwitt was one of the interviewees. William Robb -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail Lis

Re: PESO: Another "street picture"

I like it, good photo..Joe At 01:41 PM 6/29/07, you wrote: >On 6/28/07, William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/pictures/peso/walkinggirl.html > > > > Shot with the K10, and 77mm ltd. > > Cropped slightly from the full file. > > > >GREAT freaking shot! > >The t

Re: Permits may soon be required to shoot in NYC

On 6/29/07, Adam Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Likely that will be the case most often. But I expect rentacops to use this > proposed law on a regular basis to try and prevent people from shooting > buildings legally. That law won't give renta cops any more power than they have now - which

Re: Convert Raw to JPG

I will explain the example I faced myself. This doesn't happens frequently but it happended exactly the day I was sowing my brand new K10D to hte whole family ;) We had a family dinner (yeah with kids and so on) and of course parents wanna see the pics but... on the PC upstairs? No way... not prac

Re: New Scanner

On 6/29/07, Norm Baugher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Well, I'm now the owner of an Epson V700. I'm just using it mainly to > scan B&W 6x7 negs. As a complete novice, I was just wondering if anyone > could give me a few basic tips (other than don't slam your fingers in > the cover). I'm using the S

Re: GESO: The Celery Farm

I like the frog and Parnell's Path. The rest I find either ordinary or soft. Paul -- Original message -- From: "Ed Keeney" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > I'm a lurker and should make more comments along the way... > > I put together a gallery of photo's that I'm debating on

Re: Permits may soon be required to shoot in NYC

On 6/29/07, Adam Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Likely that will be the case most often. But I expect rentacops to use this > proposed law on a regular basis to try and prevent people from shooting > buildings legally. > They already try to do it illegally. Give them a law allowing it and yo

Re: New Scanner Epson V700

It's waay cool Frankie. Just trying to figure out how to use the damn thing. If you think about it, I've now gone "digital"... Norm frank theriault wrote: > On 6/29/07, Norm Baugher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Well, I'm now the owner of an Epson V700. I'm just using it mainly to >> sca

Another oldie...

Going through my Grandfather Mountain archives I found another shot I like: http://www.robertstech.com/temp/temp.htm Taken a couple of miles out on the Profile Trail just as the sun was coming up (around 6:00 a.m.) -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listin

Re: PEOW: Pie-Billed Grebe

Great capture! If I had to have one nit about it - I would like more Grebe & slightly less surroundings. Still a very good capture, well executed. Kenneth Waller - Original Message - From: "Jay Taylor" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Re: PEOW: Pie-Billed Grebe > I'll try to post the link

Re: Permits may soon be required to shoot in NYC

Well, if that were the case, they'd be arresting hundreds of people every day outside my office. We did have a jumper a couple months ago, the press were there and all I heard the cops tell them was to check with the commanding officer before they could cross the tape... Norm frank theriault wr

Re: PEOW: Pie-Billed Grebe

I haven't been able to access this pic. I keep getting forbidden messages. The url below doesn't work for me, even when pasted together. -- Original message -- From: "Kenneth Waller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Great capture! If I had to have one nit about it - I would l

Re: PEOW: Pie-Billed Grebe

Okay, got it. I agree with ken -- a bit tighter crop would help. But it's an excellent shot. Paul -- Original message -- From: "Kenneth Waller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Great capture! If I had to have one nit about it - I would like more Grebe & > slightly less surro

Re: Another oldie...

This has an unreal feel to it - like a painting or heavy photoshopping. I'm mixed about whether I like it or not. Kenneth Waller - Original Message - From: "Mark Roberts" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Subject: Another oldie... > Going through my Grandfather Mountain archives I found another shot

Re: Another oldie...

On 6/29/07, Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Going through my Grandfather Mountain archives I found another shot I > like: > http://www.robertstech.com/temp/temp.htm > > Taken a couple of miles out on the Profile Trail just as the sun was > coming up (around 6:00 a.m.) > Stunning! cheers

Re: New Scanner Epson V700

On 6/29/07, Norm Baugher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: If you think about it, I've now gone "digital"... No you haven't... ;-) cheers, frank -- "Sharpness is a bourgeois concept." -Henri Cartier-Bresson -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml

Re: Another oldie...

Even with the web image, the rich detail is apparent. I'm somewhat surprised at that. This one might be a wee bit oversaturated, but it's an excellent shot. Paul -- Original message -- From: Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Going through my Grandfather Mountain a

Re: The Celery Farm

I Took a very quick spin thru your gallery. One comment that would help I believe is that the field shots could use more separation (less depth of field) between the foreground subject & the back ground. HTH Kenneth Waller - Original Message - From: "Ed Keeney" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sub

Re: antivirus discussion

Cotty wrote: > On 28/6/07, Godfrey DiGiorgi, discombobulated, unleashed: > > >>I have a firewall in my base station that masks the internal network > >>from external view without permission, John. Nothing gets to my > >>system from the outside without my knowing it. > > > Godders, can yo

Re: Permits may soon be required to shoot in NYC

William Robb wrote: > - Original Message - > From: "Adam Maas" > Subject: Re: Permits may soon be required to shoot in NYC > > > > >>>I blame the French. > > >>On this point you may be correct. France is at the forefront of ridiculous >>restrictions on photographers, having essenti

Re: PESO: Stranded in Newcastle

Dave, John, Frank Thanks for the comments - the ship is still stuck fast, by the way. They're going to try again on Saturday night. Someone actually put it up for sale on EBay - the auction got pulled when the bidding reached $16 million.. Quoting David Savage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Tho

Re: New Scanner Epson V700

Well, half way . graywolf http://www.graywolfphoto.com http://webpages.charter.net/graywolf "Idiot Proof" <==> "Expert Proof" --- frank theriault wrote: > On 6/29/07, Norm Baugher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > If you think about it, I've now gone "digital"... > >

Re: Permits may soon be required to shoot in NYC

frank theriault wrote: > On 6/29/07, Adam Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> Likely that will be the case most often. But I expect rentacops to use this >> proposed law on a regular basis to try and prevent people from shooting >> buildings legally. > > That law won't give renta cops any m

Re: Permits may soon be required to shoot in NYC

Hey man, that is NYC, folks strip cars on the street and the cops walk right by them. NYC has lots of laws, only a few of them seem to get enforced. If fact, I am pretty sure that NYC already has a law requiring a permit for any photo/film/video operation that obstructs traffic, vehicle or pedes

Re: GESO: The Celery Farm

Hi Ed Quoting Ed Keeney <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > I'm a lurker and should make more comments along the way... > > I put together a gallery of photo's that I'm debating on using to > enter into a contest for the nature center. > > All comments and critiques are appreciated. > > http://picasaweb.go

Re: PESO: Another "street picture"

Bill, I like the timing, but the geometric pattern in the walk really highlights/contrasts the curves of the woman's body. Very nice. Regards, Bob S. On 6/29/07, frank theriault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 6/28/07, William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > http://users.accesscomm.ca/wrobb/p

Re: Permits may soon be required to shoot in NYC

- Original Message - From: "frank theriault" Subject: Re: Permits may soon be required to shoot in NYC > On 6/29/07, Adam Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > >> Likely that will be the case most often. But I expect rentacops to use >> this proposed law on a regular basis to try and pre

Re: Another oldie...

Kenneth Waller wrote: >This has an unreal feel to it - like a painting or heavy photoshopping. Interesting. It *does* have some photoshopping done, bit it's actually pretty light. Most of the effect really is from the backlighting and light fog. >> http://www.robertstech.com/temp/temp.htm

Re: New Scanner

I drive the V700 with Vuescan. It just works. G On Jun 29, 2007, at 8:56 AM, Norm Baugher wrote: > Well, I'm now the owner of an Epson V700. I'm just using it mainly to > scan B&W 6x7 negs. As a complete novice, I was just wondering if > anyone > could give me a few basic tips (other than don'

Re: Another oldie...

In a message dated 6/29/2007 1:32:23 P.M. Pacific Daylight Time, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: Going through my Grandfather Mountain archives I found another shot I like: http://www.robertstech.com/temp/temp.htm Taken a couple of miles out on the Profile Trail just as the sun was coming up (aro

Re: New Scanner

Can you extrapolate a little more on Vuescan? Norm Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote: > I drive the V700 with Vuescan. It just works. > > G > > On Jun 29, 2007, at 8:56 AM, Norm Baugher wrote: > > >> Well, I'm now the owner of an Epson V700. I'm just using it mainly to >> scan B&W 6x7 negs. As a complete

Re: Permits may soon be required to shoot in NYC

What part of the city do you live in??? Norm graywolf wrote: > Hey man, that is NYC, folks strip cars on the street and the cops walk right > by them. -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net

And Princess Grace Lived Happily Ever After!

It's over. We won. The Federal District Court issued a written opinion this afternoon denying the petition of the sodden Scot to return Grace to the UK. The Scot's Hague convention abduction case was found to be totally without merit. My princess is safe. Paul http://www.photo.net/photodb/ph

Re: And Princess Grace Lived Happily Ever After!

That's great news Paul, for Grace and you and your family. Hopefully you'll have many more good years watching her grow up happy and safe. John Coyle Brisbane, Australia - Original Message - From: "Paul Stenquist" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Pentax-Discuss Mail List" Sent: Saturday, June 3

RE: And Princess Grace Lived Happily Ever After!

Congratulations, Paul - I heard you cheering way over here in Livonia!! Um, what time's the party start?? Not for me, of course, Ken wants to know ;-) Bill Sawyer Livonia, MI -Original Message- From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Paul Stenquist Sent: Friday,

Re: And Princess Grace Lived Happily Ever After!

Thanks John. Today certainly is right up there among the best days of my life. Paul On Jun 29, 2007, at 8:58 PM, John Coyle wrote: > That's great news Paul, for Grace and you and your family. > Hopefully you'll have many more good years watching her grow up > happy and safe. > > > John Coyle >

Re: And Princess Grace Lived Happily Ever After!

The party's in full swing. I opened a bottle of Macallan 12-year-old that one of the kids bought me for father's day. Grace and I pulled some weeds and watered the gardens, but she's in bed now. Looking forward to taking her to the park tomorrow. Paul On Jun 29, 2007, at 8:56 PM, Bill Sawyer

OT: Extreme Macro

I came across this on another forum: >From the same guy who made the laser triggered camera & flash system that was posted here a year or so ago. Cheers, Dave -- PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List PDML@pdml.net http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdm

RE: And Princess Grace Lived Happily Ever After!

Sounds good. If the park is the Zoo, maybe I'll see you there. There's some new warthogs and wild dogs, and one of the Zebra's gave birth this week - the foal, I think, might be something for Grace to enjoy - I really can't think of anything much more life-affirming. Bill Sawyer Livonia, MI

Re: And Princess Grace Lived Happily Ever After!

Marvelous, Paul! And may she indeed live happily ever after! Rick --- Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > It's over. We won. The Federal District Court issued > a written > opinion this afternoon denying the petition of the > sodden Scot to > return Grace to the UK. The Scot's Hague

  1   2   >