Gotta love it, man!
Great shot.
Jostein
- Original Message -
From: "Paul Stenquist" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Sunday, July 10, 2005 11:32 PM
Subject: PESO: Red Dragon
Here's another shot from yesterday's walk in the woods. Again this
is with the A 400/5.6, the A2X-S Converter an
>
> From: Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2005/07/11 Mon AM 06:45:34 GMT
> To: "pentax list"
> Subject: Re: At long last: UK photos on line
>
> On 11/7/05, mike wilson, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
> >Good stuff, Mark. Sorry to disappoint you, but the "Roman" walls of
> >Chester were buil
> And, should I remove
> the images from the web simply because they are not "state-of-the-
> art" web images for 2005? ()
Certainly not!
John
Made you wash off the blue paint?
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
"Idiot Proof" <==> "Expert Proof"
---
Cotty wrote:
On 11/7/05, mike wilson, discombobulated, unleashed:
Good stuff, Mark. Sorry to disappoint you, but the "Roman" walls of
Chester were b
Kalleh was a neighbour's cat - he lived across the road from us and
would come to visit quite often. He used to walk straight in the
door and wander through the house as if he owned it.
We've since moved out of that place so I don't see him anymore. This
photo is from the last roll I put
Last Saturday i took my wife and a friend and decided to go to a
place, that I really wanted to visit for some time now... look what
I've found there...
As usual, any critique/comments are more the welcome.
http://mishka.site.co.il/gallery/ShipGY
Michael
G'day.
You could always get a CCW license, some good training and carry a
handgun.
Hooroo.
Regards, Trevor.
Australia
-Original Message-
From: Godfrey DiGiorgi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, 11 July 2005 1:36 AM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Major Tactical Error
U
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: "David Mann"
Subject: Re: The instigation of enablement
Mr. Mann, you are hereby charged with heresy agaist the SMC Church
of Gorgeous Glass, treason against this great nation of Pentaxia and
other high crimes and misdemeanors the na
Your experience with Microdol X is similar to my own. I used it for
quite a few years back in the seventies, mainly because it was
conveniently available pre-mixed , but eventually realized it wasn't
giving me the kind of results I needed, particularly for car
photography. I eventually switched
Only from south of here. The other half of the country was wearing it until as
recently as the 1200's - according to Mel Gibson.
>
> From: Graywolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2005/07/11 Mon AM 09:27:17 GMT
> To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> Subject: Re: At long last: UK photos on line
>
> Made yo
Hi Bob ...
As much as I want to like this photo, the burnt out highlights on the fruit
are a read distraction, and the overabundance of red actually hurts my
eyes. It seems that the photo is a bit overexposed for digital. Did you
shoot RAW or JPEG?
However, the photo did motivate me to plan a t
Thanks Jostein. I've recently discovered that bugs can be fun. And they
sit still longer than birds :-).
Paul
On Jul 10, 2005, at 5:48 PM, Jostein wrote:
Gotta love it, man!
Great shot.
Jostein
- Original Message - From: "Paul Stenquist"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Sunday, July 10
Some very nice shots here. I love 020. Great composition, wonderful
saturated color. Good stuff.
Paul
On Jul 11, 2005, at 5:32 AM, Michael Spivak wrote:
Last Saturday i took my wife and a friend and decided to go to a
place, that I really wanted to visit for some time now... look what
I've foun
Thanks Tom !
BTW the film is Fuji ProPlus II. I like this film very much lately..
it gives a very good results with the Pentax SMC 50mm F/1.7 i have...
what you see there - NO saturation work done in PS...
On 7/11/05, Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Some very nice shots here. I love 0
Some interesting composition, but most are way oversaturated and look quite
garish on my monitor. The color profile you're using may not be best
suited for web use. Stick to sRGB, or perhaps strip out the color profiles
altogether.
Shel
> [Original Message]
> From: Michael Spivak
> As usual,
>
> >On Jul 10, 2005, at 7:48 PM, Tom Reese wrote:
> >
> >> Dave Brooks must have been drunk when he wrote:
Not drunk. Just spent 3 days in horrible heat, no shade, shooting horses.
However thats
close to drunk
i suppose.LOL
> >>
> >>> So this is a feeb
"Bob W" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>The weather's always like that in Wales. It certainly never rains. We call
>it The California of the Celtic Fringe.
BTW: I think "The California of the Celtic Fringe" would be a great name
for a band.
--
Mark Roberts
Photography and writing
www.robertstech.co
Greetings all.
I thought some people may be asking about me - if not, then disregard :-)
Fortunately hurricance Dennis was fairly mild and went in around
Navarre, closer to Pensacola. Even there it was nothing compared to Ivan
last year. I think we may have had sustained winds to 30 and gusts
The results you get often depend on the technique you use.
That is, in exposing and developing.
Fuji Acros, Agfa APX-100, TMax 100, TechPan
& so many do a fine job
but do so differently for each individual.
Some personal recommendations:
1. For landscapes, if it's rocky, use a yellow or orange fi
Shel,
It was just a jpeg, I'm not shooting RAW yet. I wanted to get some
jpeg experience before trying it, and I just finished the instruction
manual last night. I'm still learning about the burnt out highlights.
(You should see the 1st try...)
The istDs is a joy. I put the FA50/1.4 on it and
Sorry for the dashes, I don't have my cleaner program on this build.
William Robb
From: Cotty
Subject: Re: At long last: UK photos on line
Yeah, well. What did the Romans ever do for us
Subject: Fw: Why We Built It That Way
> The US Standard railroad gauge (distance between the r
http://www.snopes.com/history/american/gauge.htm
On Mon, 11 Jul 2005 06:59:27 -0600, William Robb wrote:
> Sorry for the dashes, I don't have my cleaner program on this build.
>
> William Robb
>
> >> From: Cotty
> >> Subject: Re: At long last: UK photos on line
>
> >> Yeah, well. What did the
Yea, yea, yea, you're never going to let me forget that are ye.
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Someone on the Adobe Photoshop User-toUser forum mentioned the Cutout
filter (Filter-Artistic-Cutout) so I decided to play with it a bit. The
result is based on one of my photos which was posted here a few we
- Original Message -
From: "keller.schaefer"
Subject: RE: About Sigma: beware ??
I think it is not fair to gerealise based on the single known Canon
compatibility problem. Sigma gives information about this on their web
site, it
affects a known range of cameras and Sigma offers a fr
- Original Message -
From: "Godfrey DiGiorgi"
Subject: Re: B/W Film Advice Needed
On Jul 10, 2005, at 9:06 PM, William Robb wrote:
When I tested T-Max, I discovered that it has an almost straight slope
when processed in T-Max developer. I never did try it in X-Tol.
TMax develope
- Original Message -
From: "Cesar"
Subject: Safe and sound in the panhandle.
Greetings all.
I thought some people may be asking about me - if not, then disregard :-)
Thanks for the update, César
William Robb
>
> From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2005/07/11 Mon PM 01:07:53 GMT
> To:
> Subject: Re: About Sigma: beware ??
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "keller.schaefer"
> Subject: RE: About Sigma: beware ??
>
>
> >I think it is not fair to gerealise based on the single k
Guys,
A colleague and I have both independently shot a roll of Kodak HIE film
and both suffered fogging. We're trying to track down the cause and I was
hoping there might be some collective experience on the list? We actually
shot the rolls about a year apart, but apart from that everything we
- Original Message -
From: "mike wilson"
Subject: Re: Re: About Sigma: beware ??
The problem seems to be that licensing does not occur, reverse engineering
does. And Canon changes the engineering unpredictably, causing heretofore
working lens series to become unfunctional. If th
Glenn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>If you're willing to bulk load, you can get 100ft rolls of Pan F under
>the Arista brand name from Freestyle for $16.99 each.
Interesting. Where did you get this information?
--
Mark Roberts
Photography and writing
www.robertstech.com
keller.schaefer wrote:
I think it is not fair to gerealise based on the single known Canon
compatibility problem.
My own experience with Sigma -- one, just one, lens, so I will not
generalize for other people -- is with a 28-70 f/2.8-4 that I bought
several years ago. On a Super Program
On Sun, 2005-07-10 at 23:48, Tom Reese wrote:
> Mr. Brooks, you have a far better chance of seeing me in bunny ears than
> with a digital camera.
>
> VIVA LA FILME!!!
The D or DS do not look or feel like digital cameras at all. Doesn't
your thumb search for the film advance lever when you use on
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: "Cesar"
Subject: Safe and sound in the panhandle.
Greetings all.
I thought some people may be asking about me - if not, then disregard :-)
Thanks for the update, César
I'm glad you're okay Cesar. I guess I can stop sitting on the be
- Original Message -
From: "Chris Stoddart"
Subject: Kodak HIE advice please?
Can anyone suggest anything else we could have done wrong?
The Patterson tanks are likely leaking infrared light.
Other things though:
Dark bags don't offer much protection, and the canisters themselv
Shortly before my first child was born in 1968, I upgraded from a very early
('59) Olympust P&S to a Spotmatic. This is the first in a long line of
Pentaxes that are capable of taking better pictures than I am. I've won
awards with the Spotty and had pictures published in newspapers, but I'm
pr
You might find answers in these sites. The first is huge.
mike
http://www.a1.nl/phomepag/markerink/mainpage.htm
http://www.cocam.net/CoCamWS/Infrared/INFRARED.HTM
>
> From: Chris Stoddart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2005/07/11 Mon PM 01:41:57 GMT
> To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> Subject: Kodak
On 11/7/05, mike wilson, discombobulated, unleashed:
>The problem seems to be that licensing does not occur, reverse
>engineering does. And Canon changes the engineering unpredictably,
>causing heretofore working lens series to become unfunctional. If that's
>the scenario, who is providing the p
http://mishka.site.co.il/gallery/ShipGY/82530033_G
My favorite. It's almost like the two boats are huddling against each other
awaiting their ultimate fate.
Christian
- Original Message -
From: "Michael Spivak" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, July 11, 2005 5:32 AM
Subject: PESO:
Hi Bob
yes I like my 9900F too, the 9950F is not much different.
But I always calibrate it before using it and warm the lamp up by scanning
two samples before actually starting the real
scan. Otherwise it would produce a lot of blue and red tint.
greetings
Markus
>>-Original Message-
>>
> Managing Director: Konichiwa, Yokohama-san. And what do you have
> for me today?
>
> Mr. Y: Yes sir, I have struggled long and hard, but I have come up with
> a new method of auto-focus for our cameras. I present to you a prototype
> digital SLR with laser distancing technology. This will all
>
> From: Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2005/07/11 Mon PM 01:57:06 GMT
> To: "pentax list"
> Subject: Re: About Sigma: beware ??
>
> On 11/7/05, mike wilson, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
> >The problem seems to be that licensing does not occur, reverse
> >engineering does. And Canon chan
Joaquim Carvalho wrote:
On Sun, 2005-07-10 at 23:48, Tom Reese wrote:
Mr. Brooks, you have a far better chance of seeing me in bunny ears than
with a digital camera.
VIVA LA FILME!!!
The D or DS do not look or feel like digital cameras at all. Doesn't
your thumb search for the film advance
On 11/7/05, mike wilson, discombobulated, unleashed:
>Indeed. When world domination is at stake, all bets are off.
Good point.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
>
> From: Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2005/07/11 Mon PM 02:18:37 GMT
> To: "pentax list"
> Subject: Re: About Sigma: beware ??
>
> On 11/7/05, mike wilson, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
> >Indeed. When world domination is at stake, all bets are off.
>
> Good point.
>
>
Eythangyew
On 11/7/05, Cesar, discombobulated, unleashed:
>Greetings all.
Yo Cesar, glad to see you're okay
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
This one time, at band camp, Chris Stoddart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> 1. We both were slavishly careful in handling the film, loading and
> unloading in a changing bag, keeping the film in its plastic tub when
> outside the camera.
Be sure the plastic Tub is Black and that the lid is black
On Jul 11, 2005, at 5:28 AM, David Mann wrote:
Kalleh was a neighbour's cat - he lived across the road from us and
would come to visit quite often. He used to walk straight in the door
and wander through the house as if he owned it.
We've since moved out of that place so I don't see him any
>
> From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2005/07/11 Mon PM 01:41:23 GMT
> To:
> Subject: Re: Re: About Sigma: beware ??
>
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "mike wilson"
> Subject: Re: Re: About Sigma: beware ??
>
>
> >
> > The problem seems to be that licensing does not
Then you'll have slide film when the E6 processing is no longer
available? It is a plan I suppose...
Tom Reese wrote:
I'll shoot slides as long as I can buy the film. I have 200 rolls in
the refrigerator right now and I'm thinking about buying more. When
(if) slide film goes away then I do
P. J. Alling wrote:
Then you'll have slide film when the E6 processing is no longer
available? It is a plan I suppose...
I've been using the film at a pretty rapid pace. I doubt that processing
will disappear within the next year.
Tom Reese
There were six of us in Philly this weekend. Precisely one half of us
were shooting (or attempting to shoot) film. While we were definitely
a small sample, perhaps film is a bit more alive amongst (semi-)
serious photographers.
To add fuel to the fire, I ran into a camera club a few weeks ago at
I'll be in Cleveland this coming weekend. Any listers in the
neighborhood? I have a date at the zoo Saturday afternoon, but
otherwise should be fairly flexible Saturday evening and most of the
day Sunday. I was wondering if anyone might be interested in shooting
a few frames and downing a few be
This is for those of you who purchased an istDs: Why did you choose it over
the istD? Availability? Price? Size? Features? Which features?
If you're familiar with the features of both cameras, do you now, after
using the istDs, think you'd have been better served by the istD (leaving
price o
-- Sid Barras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The "favorite" pentax poll generated lots of good
> stuff. Got me to
> thinking about my first pentax.
>
Mine was the MX with 50/1.7
Bought new in the early 80s and I still have it today.
Wendy
Wendy Beard
Ottawa, Canada
This list is beyond an instigator - it's more of a pusher.
Since I've been reading, and sometimes contributing, somehow I've managed to
acquire:
Bodies: KX, MX, *ist D
Body Attachments: Motor Drive A (for SuperProgram), Winder MX, Hand Grip FDP
(for Z-1), Battery Grip D-BG1 (for *ist D), Ha
If 200 rolls is what you need for one year or so, OK. I agree that E-6 will
take longer than that to die.
However, even in my underdeveloped area (pun intended), more and more labs
are giving up to process E-6.
I believe it will soon become a mail order only option, offered by a few
labs here an
--- Scott Loveless <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Since joining the list in February, I've experienced
> enablement in the
> worst way. I have acquired no less than one body,
> three primes, one
> zoom, a camera bag, everything necessary to process
> black and white
> film, a film scanner, at least
I would guess that Patterson tank is the culprit. It is probably not opaque to
infra-red.
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
"Idiot Proof" <==> "Expert Proof"
---
Chris Stoddart wrote:
2. We both used a Patterson plastic developing tank.
--
No virus foun
Ack! Allow me to remove my foot from my mouth. The *ist does,
indeed, have a user replaceable screen. No mention of it in the
manual. Nothing on the Pentax site. But since I actually own one of
these, you'd think I would know. DOH!
On 7/8/05, Scott Loveless <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You a
# 2 cause he's going R to L. Seems like most bike rider shots have the rider
going from L to R.
Hey you asked.
Kenneth Waller
-Original Message-
From: Shel Belinkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Jul 6, 2005 9:33 PM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: RE: PAW/PESOs: Tofu at CMWC
#1
S
Film is dead.
Translation: I just spent thousands on digital and I have to tell my wife
something.
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
"Idiot Proof" <==> "Expert Proof"
---
Scott Loveless wrote:
There were six of us in Philly this weekend. Precisely one hal
On 7/11/05, wendy beard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> This list made me buy a K1000, an ME Super, an LX, a
> 67 and loads of other stuff I really didn't need.
> I didn't need any encouragment to buy the MZ-S, *istD,
> 43 and 77mm ltds though
Folkstake note. Wendy has submitted a correct re
On Mon, 2005-07-11 at 15:12, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
> This is for those of you who purchased an istDs: Why did you choose it over
> the istD? Availability? Price? Size? Features? Which features?
Availability, price, size, more reliable SD cards.
Featurewise the D is better (multiple WB memori
> My F*300 has been modified by its previous owner... he took the tripod
> mount to a metal shop and they chopped it down a bit which makes it much
> easier to fit in the bag. I still have some photos of it online:
> http://www.digistar.com/~dmann/temp/300f4-5.html
Thanks, Dave, for the shots. T
A few months ago I was talking with a film maker, and she mentioned that
showing a subject moving from left to right on the screen indicates
movement towards something, such as when a ship leaves a port and heads out
to sea it will be shown on the screen as moving L to R. Right to Left
means that
Price.
Availablity (kinda).
Because of my innate nature to want stuff when I'm looking at it, I
never even looked at any digital SLR, until I had funds.
When some Christmas money, and post-Christmas DS sales made the DS
within reach, I started looking. At the time, none of the Camera
stores in O
Larry Levy asked about the Pentaxus Gatherupia virus (commonly known as
Diminishing Assets Disease):
OK, I know about the disease, anyone know about a cure?
The only one sure way to get rid of the virus is to starve it. You have
to turn all finances over to your spouse/SO or whoever else i
If you own at least one of everything it's hard to justify buying
more... Sometimes anyway.
Larry Levy wrote:
This list is beyond an instigator - it's more of a pusher.
Since I've been reading, and sometimes contributing, somehow I've
managed to acquire:
Bodies: KX, MX, *ist D
Body Atta
Dario Bonazza wrote:
If 200 rolls is what you need for one year or so, OK. I agree that E-6
will take longer than that to die.
However, even in my underdeveloped area (pun intended), more and more
labs are giving up to process E-6.
I believe it will soon become a mail order only option, offered
That's the nice thing about Pentax you don't have to spend thousands on
digital, if you've already spent thousands on film equipment...
Graywolf wrote:
Film is dead.
Translation: I just spent thousands on digital and I have to tell my
wife something.
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
"
Nobody has mentioned the fact that the *ist-DS has a better ( larger,
higher resolution ) color LCD viewer. That's a nice feature.
Dave Kennedy wrote:
Price.
Availablity (kinda).
Because of my innate nature to want stuff when I'm looking at it, I
never even looked at any digital SLR, until
But they are still selling the D it may not be available everywhere but
it's still being sold, and is considered part
of their line. (If they weren't selling it they'd drop the price and
blow it out of the places that have it).
Joaquim Carvalho wrote:
On Mon, 2005-07-11 at 15:12, Shel Belin
When shooting jpeg... (AAARHH! You DON'T have to shoot jpeg!!!)
...OK, IF and WHEN shooting jpeg, the DS shows improved (extended) exposure
latitude. Difference is pretty big, and I'd like having that software in my
*istD, since I shoot almost exclusively jpeg... (AAARHH! You DON'
On 7/11/05, Larry Levy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> OK, I know about the disease, anyone know about a cure?
>
Yes. Find another, more expensive hobby. You'll have no cash left
for Pentax goodies. Classic cars/motorbikes would be a good choice.
You might take up trap shooting - over-unders
This is exactly what happened in Italy (and the rest of Europe, if I
understand well). The *istD clearance sale took place last January. Of
course, a few stores can still stock some of them if they are unable to
sell.
AFAIK, D production stopped in late 2004, when the DS was introduced, hence
n
Better? Perhaps just different features. The faster buffer speed may, for
some, make the istDs a "better" choice.
In what way are SD cards more reliable than CF cards?
Shel
> [Original Message]
> From: Joaquim Carvalho
> > This is for those of you who purchased an istDs: Why did you choose
I haven't used an S, but there are at least three reasons why I didn't consider
it as an alternative to my second D. First, there's only one thumbwheel. When
shooting manual or program, I've come to rely greatly on the two thumbwheels. I
can swap stops and shutter speed rapidly without taking my
The only reason I have to spend a lot of time in in processing my raw
images is when I do
something wrong, then I'm very glad that I shot raw not Jpeg. Mostly I
just copy the images
off the card, pick the one I want to print or display on the web.
Modify my white balance if
it needs it and I'm
Bettter than being remembered as Mr. Bunny Ears ... at least you can blame
the spell checker.
Shel
> [Original Message]
> From: P. J. Alling
> Yea, yea, yea, you're never going to let me forget that are ye.
>
> Shel Belinkoff wrote:
>
> >Someone on the Adobe Photoshop User-toUser forum menti
On 7/11/05, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
snip
> Finally, there's the CF card issue. Since Pentax considers the D to be the
> top of the line, I expect that the successor high-end DSLR will use CF cards.
Is this true? Admittedly, I have not been following the new SLR
market, but i
To get an idea abot exposure latitude difference between the D and the DS:
www.dariobonazza.com/provv/latitude.jpg
Dario
- Original Message -
From: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, July 11, 2005 12:05 PM
Subject: Re: Why an istDs?
> I haven't used an S, but there are at least three reasons why I didn't
consider it as an alternative to my second D. First, there's only one
thumbwheel. When shooting ma
On Jul 11, 2005, at 7:11 AM, mike wilson wrote:
Played with Daddy's new 350D over the weekend. It started making
B&W pictures under "program" (sic) and we could not work out how to
make it stop. My nose kept changing things and I got really
cheesed off with it.
You should train that no
I'm seeing more cameras using the SD card, and several using SD and CF. It
may be that CF is on the decline, or perhaps in some market segments. I'd
suggest that smaller cards will be the preferred choice of camera
manufacturers once memory capacity increases. SD cards are now up to 2 gb,
they h
On Jul 11, 2005, at 7:03 AM, mike wilson wrote:
The problem seems to be that licensing does not occur, reverse
engineering
does. And Canon changes the engineering unpredictably, causing
heretofore
working lens series to become unfunctional. If that's the
scenario, who
is providing the p
Scott, I felt like being struck by the lightening!
But also felt some consolation that I was not alone :-).
See below.
Cheers,
Ken
On 7/11/05 11:53 AM, "Scott Loveless" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Yes. Find another, more expensive hobby.
I already have.
> You'll have no cash left for Pent
I got myself a D and not a DS because:
* HyperProgram
* 2 wheels
* TTL with old lenses
* grip with vertical shutter.
* access to biggercards (6GB microdrives)
* Price was about the same
--
Thibouille
--
*ist-D,Z1,SFXn,SuperA,KX,MX, P30t and KR-10x ...
I have no wife.
Godfrey
On Jul 11, 2005, at 8:31 AM, Graywolf wrote:
Film is dead.
Translation: I just spent thousands on digital and I have to tell
my wife something.
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
"Idiot Proof" <==> "Expert Proof"
---
Scott Lovel
Three actually, and the Japan site seems to be doing the same thing, at
least it was last time I looked.
Dario Bonazza wrote:
This is exactly what happened in Italy (and the rest of Europe, if I
understand well). The *istD clearance sale took place last January. Of
course, a few stores can s
The CF cards are more prone to breaking pins off the connectors, though
that's usually in poorly designed devices.
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Better? Perhaps just different features. The faster buffer speed may, for
some, make the istDs a "better" choice.
In what way are SD cards more reliable th
OK, I know about the disease, anyone know about a cure?
Um, try taking pictures instead of buying and selling equipment? It's
much more entertaining, and, if you shoot enough film, should consume
all your available spare funds.
Godfrey
Hi!
http://www.robertstech.com/temp/uk2005.htm
Yes, it's been over two months, but I *have* had actual paying
photographic work that had to come first, so I can't whine too much (you
lot can feel free...)
A lot of these photos are just "tourist shots" for my parents, but there
are a few that I
And I bet that the cost of the writer/reader inside the camera is already
lower for the SD, due to the large amount of them manufactured for compact
camera/cameraphone/palmtop business. This is an excellent reason (for the
manufacturer) to choose SD instead of CF.
Dario
- Original Message
Or it may be just that film producers have conditioned us that way?
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
"Idiot Proof" <==> "Expert Proof"
---
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
A few months ago I was talking with a film maker, and she mentioned that
showing a subject movin
On 7/11/05, Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I have no wife.
>
> Godfrey
>
You're better off that way.
--
Scott Loveless
http://www.twosixteen.com
--
"You have to hold the button down" -Arnold Newman
Damn, I wish I'd said that.
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Jul 11, 2005, at 7:11 AM, mike wilson wrote:
Played with Daddy's new 350D over the weekend. It started making
B&W pictures under "program" (sic) and we could not work out how to
make it stop. My nose kept changing things and I got r
OK, three now somewhere, as long as the stock lasts (and two now in Italy).
Dario
- Original Message -
From: "P. J. Alling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Monday, July 11, 2005 6:36 PM
Subject: Re: Why an istDs?
Three actually, and the Japan site seems to be doing the same thing, at
"P. J. Alling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>The only reason I have to spend a lot of time in in processing my raw
>images is when I do something wrong, then I'm very glad that I shot
>raw not Jpeg. Mostly I just copy the images off the card, pick the
>one I want to print or display on the web.
Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>If Canon's changes were so unpredictable and so difficult to keep in
>compliance with, how come the same Canon lens produced in 1985 works
>flawlessly on the latest Canon EOS body, despite 20 years of
>unpredictable body changes and no change to t
Sorry to hear that, I hope u feel better. In TX its easy to register to
carry (a weapon) as long as you dont have a criminal record, and thugs
here generally have to think twice before attempting to do what was done
to you in baltimore.
D. Glenn Arthur Jr. wrote:
Note to self: if I'm ever ju
1 - 100 of 240 matches
Mail list logo
