On 5/12/04, Peter J. Alling, discombobulated, unleashed:
>Adware usually runs as a service, if it's written properly it won't show
>up in the Dock.
Where do I look for it running? Ah - System Profiler. I wonder if there
are any adware/spyware checking apps for the Mac, I'll go look on
versiontra
Near San Francisco Museum of Modern Art it's gone now :-((
http://home.earthlink.net/~sbelinkoff/wall-bw.html
Shel
On Dec 6, 2004, at 4:12 PM, Peter J. Alling wrote:
Adware usually runs as a service, if it's written properly it won't
show up in the Dock.
In the Applications folder under Utilities is a program called Activity
Monitor. Like the Windows task manager, it is quite cryptic to those
who haven't se
Hi,
Monday, December 6, 2004, 1:30:00 AM, Lasse wrote:
> Ok, I was just being curious whether you immediately spotted the
> Monroe connection just by the names, or if you had to check it out.
> (Anyway, when sending the Q. I thought "Bob W. will definitely
> know (or be curious enough to find) th
[ ... ] MZ-5, and claiming that there are just cosmetical differences between
the two. Just in case I'm the one who's it wrong, isn't that quite
wrong, or downright dishonest? Doesn't the MZ-5n have a number of
updates to the *functionality* compared to the MZ-5? (Bojidar Dimitrov's
page
Just beware that the S-HMC CPL does not have front thread, only the Pro1
does (also S-HMC, but thinner rim). Pro1 UV is S-HMC with thinner glass and
3mm rim, you might save quite a bit but using the S-HMC UV which has 5mm rim
and regular thickness glass (more protection I guess).
Alan Chan
http
Hello.
Be greeted from Israel :).
> I have been using Pentax body and lens from 1986 - Have about 5000 35-mm
> slides -- but still consider myself within the realm of "amateur". My pix
> are mostly photo-journalistic, editorial, nature and travel. I wrote a few
> articles to go with my pix whic
An assortment of pics from the past 3 years.
Misplaced until the other day.
Scanned with Epson 3170.
This scanner is reasonably fast and the results are nice.
A couple of these and other not shown have become PUG submissions.
2 shots of clocks displayed in a shop in the area.
http://members.safe-t
Lasse Karlsson
Sun, 05 Dec 2004 17:26:21 -0800
>Adding the personal aspects of her life to it,
>she will be the closest anyone
>will ever get to giving a face to the notion of
>A Modern Day Female Jesus-character.
Celebrity? Granted.
Sex symbol? Most certainly.
Inspiring? To what end, other
Hi Bob,
Great choice of camera. you won't be disappointed. I too shoot with an
MZ-S and love it. The BG10 is a really nice addon and improves the
handling substantially.
Patrick
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I picked up a used MZ-S, as the last of the 35mm film line.
(I suppose the *ist is the prob
On 6/12/04, David Mann, discombobulated, unleashed:
>In the Applications folder under Utilities is a program called Activity
>Monitor. Like the Windows task manager, it is quite cryptic to those
>who haven't seen it before. If you filter the process list with "My
>Processes" in the drop-down
For those using PS, this may be of some interest. A couple of weeks ago I
discovered the help and support forum which I HIGHLY recommend for anyone
with Photoshop issues or questions. Even if you're not having problems
it's a great place to browse and just pick up tips and learn more about the
wo
Collin,
Crisp uploads. Impressive!
I, also, use an Epson Perfection 3170, but I don't
believe I've gotten results of this quality. Your
images 'appear' to include more info than mine after
treatment in PS.
Assume they are 35mm(?) If you recall, what dpi? Pro
mode?
My medium formate scans are fairl
Welcom to the list, Krishna.
I sexpeect you'll get the help you seek, as I'm not shure about M42 Screw
Mount on a digital body. You can mount these OK with a Screw to K-adapter,
but I'm not shure if the diaphragm/stop down will work, though.
I am sometimes considering getting a Spotnatic F myself,
Hi Guys,
I just bought a new car cd player. Audio CDs play fine, but songs on MP3
format appear as several tracks with small blanks between them, no big
deal just annoying. Neither Angela Bofill nor Patty Austin deserve that
treatment ;)
TIA and Best Regards
Arturo Medina
semi-professional lurk
Jack Davis
Mon, 06 Dec 2004 07:38:29 -0800
>Collin,
>Crisp uploads. Impressive!
>I, also, use an Epson Perfection 3170, but I don't
>believe I've gotten results of this quality. Your
>images 'appear' to include more info than mine after
>treatment in PS.
>Assume they are 35mm(?) If you recall, wh
Lucky you... (I had to sell mine to finance the *ist D). I can relate to the
comparison to the Super Program. Nice concept. I missed the Z-1 like
functionality of the *ist D, thoug (aperture control from the body), having
used then PZ-1 and PZ-1p for 12 years. I totally agree about the MZ-D -
bril
For those who purchased this lens new, did the drop-in filter housing come
empty, or was it already equipped with a 49mm filter of some sort? I've
been told both by Pentax/Colorado. I also noticed that the Pentax website
(and Boz's website also) show it having a 43mm filter... but I think it's
actu
I have an opportunity to get the Tak 35/2.3 so was wondering what would be a
fair price for it, also for the 85/1.8 (it is Auto unfortunately so may not
buy it if it ain't so good).
I'll probably buy the Tak 35/2 down the road, I love messing about with the
35's as they are close to normal on my 20
What sort of blacklight is this? Garden-variety, or one of the ones
with danger signs all over it about UV exposure?
Was thinking of doing something with a germicidal UV lamp, similar to
http://www.mikeg2.freeserve.co.uk/eprom/eraser.html
-Mat
On Sun, 5 Dec 2004 15:14:22 -0500, J. C. O'Connell <[
As the old joke goes, "You know you're having a bad day, when Elton John
rerwrites candle in the wind using your name."
-Original Message-
From: Collin Brendemuehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Dec 6, 2004 8:52 AM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Marilyn Monroe anyone? (Was: December Trivia Q N
Collin,
I think the fact that they are scans from prints is
the most likely 'secret'. All other scanner settings
are those I've often used. NO JPG'S..forever tiff's!
Your handling info is appreciated.
Jack
PS:It is a redundant time.
--- Collin Brendemuehl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Jack Davi
I own the "A" version which takes a thin 49mm.
Jack
--- Jerome Reyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For those who purchased this lens new, did the
> drop-in filter housing come
> empty, or was it already equipped with a 49mm filter
> of some sort? I've
> been told both by Pentax/Colorado. I also no
Shel,
This is a shot I would have, also, taken without
really knowing why.
Sort of 'interesting'.
Jack
--- Shel Belinkoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Near San Francisco Museum of Modern Art it's
> gone now :-((
>
> http://home.earthlink.net/~sbelinkoff/wall-bw.html
>
> Shel
>
>
>
Rob Studdert wrote on 12/5/2004, 10:33 PM:
> More flash/macro experiments. Warning ugly bug macro:
>
> http://home.swiftdsl.com.au/~distudio/temp/IMGP9150.jpg
Wow, that's sharp! I like the symmetry too. bugs aren't ugly.
--
Christian
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Welcome to the MZ-S owners club! I think it's a great camera, especially with A
and M prime lenses. I wish the control dial was slightly less stiff so I could
turn it with one finger, and that it showed the aperture in the viewfinder and
imprinted on the film with A lenses in Av mode, but othe
Paul Stenquist wrote on 12/5/2004, 10:56 AM:
> http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2934874&size=lg
>
It's a very nice detailed shot. I think I'd prefer it lit from the
front on a black background for more detail.
--
Christian
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Hi Pentax Users
I went to lurk mode but still try to read all ouf the messages and have a
look ath the photos...
I received a used Epson 2100 including some fresh inks for free and wonder:
What's the best storage place for the ink, normal room temperature oder the
fridge or else?
thanks
Markus
I've uploaded some pics that I've taken since I got the DS.
For those of you who may be interested in getting the DS, I hope they
are good enough to convince you to get one!
http://www.flickr.com/photos/yschang/
PS: The indoor shots are all taken at ISO1600.
Cheers
Andy
Well its evident i cannot scan worth crap,so i'll comment on those than
can.LOL
Here are 3 more Pug comments(its lunch and snowing like crazy:-))
"La Hougue Bie"
by Joseph Tainter
Looks like you nailed the
The bottom ones of ther stumps or what ever, have nice detail and sharpness on
my monitor.
Can you tell us what len(s) you used.
Dave(going to look at a D wednesday)Brooks
> I've uploaded some pics that I've taken since
I
got the DS.
> For those of you who
! Resent with spelling mistakes fixed
>
>
> Well its evident i cannot scan worth crap,so i'll comment on those
> than can.LOL
>
> Here are 3 more P
Dave,
I'll add the lens details on the tag so it's easy for everyone to see...
Andy
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Monday, December 06, 2004 8:40 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Some istDS test pics
The bottom ones of ther stumps or what
Hello Nick,
Just a tip - When I owned two of them I found that the dial rotated
smoothly when pulled rather than pushed. So the technique is to
lightly pull from top to bottom on one side of the dial or other with
your thumb instead of pushing against it. Try it - you'll be
surprised how it sudd
Nick,
Would use please educate me as to what you mean by
"..ERC, small and medium fronts" and how they relate
to lens mounts?
Thanks,
Jack
--- Nick Clark <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Welcome to the MZ-S owners club! I think it's a
> great camera, especially with A and M prime lenses.
> I wish th
From the pop quiz of a couple of weeks ago.
3 replies, so hardly a representative sample.
William Robb
Pop Quiz:
1) Do you actually worry about the dirt level in your cameras?
* Yes
* no
*no
2) When you clean your camera, what parts do you clean?
* Outside with a soft cloth (dry) including outside
I ordered this lens recently after seeing some positive comments on dpreview,
backed up by a link to images, including one showing very good sharpness at
f2.8. After ordering it I saw some comments here indicating that it is soft in
the corners at f2.8. This was followed by Will Robb commenting
ERC = Ever Ready Case. The back section fits the body and the front sections
clip to it and cover the lens. The back attaches to the tripod socket which
isn't as good as the M series cases, but it's not too bad. I find these cases
great for going out with just one or two lenses (the other in a p
For those who purchased this lens new, did the drop-in filter housing come
empty, or was it already equipped with a 49mm filter of some sort? I've
been told both by Pentax/Colorado. I also noticed that the Pentax website
(and Boz's website also) show it having a 43mm filter... but I think it's
actu
- Original Message -
From: "jtainter"
Subject: FA 20 f2.8
And all of you thought that all I did was gripe.
Mrs. Tainter, Could you let Joe out of the closet now please? We
really miss him.
William Robb
- Original Message -
From: "Nick Clark"
Subject: RE: MZ-S - new to me
ERC = Ever Ready Case.
Ah yes, I learned to call them NRC (Never Ready Case).
William Robb
Jerome, I think the filter kit for the lens actually has 6 of them in
a soft pouch-case. I forgot UV and Cloudy. But the kit, to be
complete, should include a green filter...
Andre
Hi,
> Thanks Dave -did that - but how can I tell what is Mac stuff and what is
> foreign infestation?? It all looks fine to me but is there anything I
> should be suspicious about?
the genuine Mac stuff will be unbearably winsome and cute, and will
test your gag reflex.
--
Cheers,
Bob
When: Tonight, Dec. 6, 2004, 7PM
Where: Cafe Deluxe (sounds like a gay bar, but who am I to question TV's
orientation...) http://www.cafedeluxe.com/locdirCDtyson.htm
Why: Do we really need a "why"? Well it is Cesar's birthday.
Sorry for the late notice, TV "lost" his dc-pdml distribution list so
Ok, guys and gals. Time for some Pre-Christmas family fun.
Below is a list of names.
What does this particular list represent?
(The people behind these names all share one particular thing in
common. What is it?)
Lasse
They all give or receive Leica equipment at Christmas...
Andre
On 6 Dec 2004 at 0:00, jtainter wrote:
> At f2.8 the Pentax lens blows away the Sigma. It is noticeably sharper in the
> center, at the edges, and at the corners. And this is with the Pentax lens
> wide
> open while the Sigma is stopped down 1.3 stops. The FA 20 is a keeper and goes
> into my kit
Jerome, I have a 600mm FA that uses 43mm filters. I'm told that there needs to
be a filter in that holder. FWIW, I"ve never shot anything with out a filter
there so I can' tell you what the effect would be.
Kenneth Waller
-Original Message-
From: Jerome Reyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subjec
Thanks Andy.
Very helpfull and some nice detail in the old K and M lenses. The last two with
the A 50
look great. I
happen to own one so its nice to see what it will do.
Dave
> Dave,
> I'll add the lens details on the tag so it's easy for everyone to se
"All we are is a nother brick in the wall" :-)
Nice capture Shel.And nice scan to.
The shot shows a lot of detail from the wall art. Good contrast to.
Good thing you wakled past it one day eh.?
Dave
> Near San Francisco Museum of Modern Art
it's gone
Xian, TV:
I know you said short notice... but damn. You may as well have emailed us
from the Cafe, ya bum :o) But anyhow... If it was this coming weekend,
then I would be all over it. But a 3+ hour drive ain't happening tonight
(been up since 5am).
Anyhow, put me on the distribution list. Maybe n
They are all but two (Inge, Cecil) male, it seemsI!
Jens Bladt
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Lasse Karlsson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sendt: 5. december 2004 18:01
Til: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Emne: December Trivia Q No1.
Ok, guys and gals
Aren't you even curious to see if there is a performance difference?
Shel
> [Original Message]
> From: Kenneth Waller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Jerome, I have a 600mm FA that uses 43mm filters.
> I'm told that there needs to be a filter in that holder.
> FWIW, I"ve never shot anything with out a
Kenneth,
> Jerome, I have a 600mm FA that uses 43mm filters.
okay... now I'm confused. Pentax tech support says 49mm. Pentax website
says 43mm... Boz: 43mm... B&H: 49mm (d'oh!)
but... um... I guess I can just measure it, huh? Or take the lens to the
store with me (which I've been trying to
Hi Dave ...
Didja get your computer problems solved? With all the advice you got I'd
imagine so ;-))
Thanks for the "atta boy." So glad you like it.
Since originally working on this in PS I've learned some new techniques and
have some new tools, and am in the process of updating it with plans
Love this lenslucky dog.
Norm
William Robb wrote:
An EL Nikkor 50mm/2.8,
> Aren't you even curious to see if there is a performance difference?
Well, *I* am. That's for sure. And to be honest, I have my money on *not*.
But the jury is still out.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 12/4/2004, 7:13 AM:
> I like it.
> Nice.
> Is the blue tinge from the length of exposure or the way the air was
> showing the reflected
> light.
Yes(?)
:-)
--
Christian
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Ann Sanfedele wrote on 12/4/2004, 8:56 AM:
>
> Photography A+, buildings D-
> I'll take the old barn and the two without the ugly buildings...
> and, um, maybe they couldn't change the name of the bay :)
>
> Serious comment, comes up a little light on my monitor. I'm more
> enamoured of
According to Pentax Japan web site, the lens should come with case, hood, PF
filter. B&H also lists the filter included. I remember there was mentioned
internal filter was part of the system and should be used at all time, but I
cannot confirm.
Alan Chan
http://www.pbase.com/wlachan
For those w
Jerome Reyes mused:
>
> Kenneth,
>
> > Jerome, I have a 600mm FA that uses 43mm filters.
>
> okay... now I'm confused. Pentax tech support says 49mm. Pentax website
> says 43mm... Boz: 43mm... B&H: 49mm (d'oh!)
The A lenses take 49mm internal filters; The FA lenses take 43mm filters.
I don
- Original Message -
From: "Norman Baugher"
Subject: Re: Darkroom Equipment Aquisition
Love this lenslucky dog.
An EL Nikkor 50mm/2.8,
I have two of them now.
WOOF!!
William Robb
Nick,
Bruce showed us how rotate the dial with a pull at Grandfather
Mountain this year.
He had somebody's MZ-S (Caesar's? or Tom C.'s?). Bruce sure does know
his equipment. I remembered the trick when I got the camera and have
had no dial problems.
I checked the roll counter on my first roll o
> Hi Dave ...
>
> Didja get your computer problems solved? With all the advice you got I'd
> imagine so ;-))
Not yet,but yes some good advise. Shooting a horse show Sunday so no time to
continue my
adventures. Tonight.
>
> Thanks for the "atta boy." So
They are all but two (Inge, Cecil) male, it seemsI!
Jens Bladt
Cecil Beaton
is a male...
Andre
Hi Jerome
Pentax tech support says 49mm. Pentax website
says 43mm... Boz: 43mm... B&H: 49mm (d'oh!)
Here BH says 43mm...
http://www.bhphotovideo.com/bnh/controller/home?O=productlist&A=details&Q=&sku=99752&is=REG
but... um... I guess I can just measure it, huh?
Indeed, you should measure it an
Toralf Lund a écrit :
[ ... ] MZ-5, and claiming that there are just cosmetical
differences between the two. Just in case I'm the one who's it
wrong, isn't that quite wrong, or downright dishonest? Doesn't the
MZ-5n have a number of updates to the *functionality* compared to
the MZ-5? (Bojidar
On 6/12/04, Christian, discombobulated, unleashed:
>Sorry for the late notice, TV "lost" his dc-pdml distribution list so if
>any of you would like to come please do. And if anyone in the DC, VA,
>MD, WV, PA, etc areas would like to e-mail me privately so I can
>maintain some sort of list that
On 6/12/04, Christian, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
>Sorry for the late notice, TV "lost" his dc-pdml distribution list so if
>any of you would like to come please do. And if anyone in the DC, VA,
>MD, WV, PA, etc areas would like to e-mail me privately so I can
>maintain some sort of list th
On 6/12/04, Bob W, discombobulated, unleashed:
>the genuine Mac stuff will be unbearably winsome and cute, and will
>test your gag reflex.
LOL. Oh yeah - and reliable ;-)
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
Okay, I think I'm about to supplement the bag with a
MZ-S+battery grip and 360 flash.
Convince me that I don't want the MZ-S or that I do.
Perhaps my major concern is auto focus performance.
Not only accuracy, but does it raise a fuss and
'labor' in so doing. High noise level compared to
others you
- Original Message -
From: "Jack Davis"
Subject: MZ-S
Okay, I think I'm about to supplement the bag with a
MZ-S+battery grip and 360 flash.
Convince me that I don't want the MZ-S
Film is dead.
William Robb
Congratulations on your choice of the Pentax MZ-S! It's a very enjoyable
camera to use, with a high-quality feel to it. If you get the BG-10 grip,
it's even better. The infra-red remote is handier than you might think,
enabling self-portraits from as far away as 15-20 feet, and a good
substi
On Dec 6, 2004, at 10:57 PM, William Robb wrote:
Film is dead.
Einstein is dead, too.
--
Best regards
Sylwek
Alan,
> B&H also lists the filter included.
Wow. You're absolutely right; thanks! I'm not sure why the Pentax tech
person told me 49mm... but I see where I may have gotten 49mm from on the
B&H website (the 300mm A version is listed as such). I'm not sure how I
missed the filter on the "included i
God is dead.
Nietzsche is dead.
Go for it! The MZ-S is a great camera, and even better with the BG-10 grip.
Not so sure about the 360 flash, since the head doesn't swivel. I've been
using a Metz 40MZ-3 flash with my MZ-S, with good success.
The MZ-S focuses well in dim light, better than the D100 or S1 Pro. As for
noise, i
Room temp has worked for me the last 7 years.
Of course this is Michigan, YMMV!
I always run my printers out of ink. No problems.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: "Markus Maurer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, December 06, 2004 12:20 PM
Subject: RE: Eps
Not in the least!
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: "Shel Belinkoff" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, December 06, 2004 2:57 PM
Subject: Re: another filter question: FA* 300mm F2.8
> Aren't you even curious to see if there is a performance difference?
>
I just tried a "normal" Tiffen 43mm 1A and it is too thick!
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: "Jerome Reyes"
Subject: RE: another filter question: FA* 300mm F2.8
> Alan,
>
> > B&H also lists the filter included.
>
> Wow. You're absolutely right; thanks! I'm not sure why the
I'm not a slave to the latest technology!
Jack
I should have made you an exception.
--- William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Jack Davis"
> Subject: MZ-S
>
>
> > Okay, I think I'm about to supplement the bag with
> a
> > MZ-S+battery grip and 360
Can we recover from the Robb infection?
Jack
--- God <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Nietzsche is dead.
>
>
__
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com
Both the 300 f/2.8 and the 600 f/4 lenses use the same 43mm, six filter kit: "Y48" (yellow-green), "R60" (red),
"O(oh)56" (orange), "L39" (appears clear), "Normal" (appears clear), and "Cloudy" (Skylight or 1A).
Both lenses shoot neutral color without a filter installed.
Hope this helps.
Andre Lan
From: "Nietzsche" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, December 07, 2004 12:22 AM
Subject: Re: MZ-S
> God is dead.
No, I'm NOT!
I just haven't been posting that much lately.
But I will stick around, don't worry.
Been busy caring for my adopted daughter, Marilyn.
(Funny, th
> "Both lenses shoot neutral color without a filter installed"
Ok, I'll bite -
why do they come with a filter installed then?
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: "John Munro" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, December 06, 2004 6:03 PM
Subject: Re: another fi
- Original Message -
From: "Jack Davis"
Subject: Re: MZ-S
I'm not a slave to the latest technology!
Jack
I should have made you an exception.
I have a wife what do I need a slave for?
William Robb
- Original Message -
From: "Jack Davis"
Subject: Re: MZ-S
Can we recover from the Robb infection?
Take a pill.
William Robb
You are a 'pill'.
Jack
--- William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Jack Davis"
> Subject: Re: MZ-S
>
>
> > Can we recover from the Robb infection?
>
> Take a pill.
>
> William Robb
>
>
__
Do you
On 6/12/04, Jack Davis, discombobulated, unleashed:
>You are a 'pill'.
Ladies and gentleman, seconds out, round 1
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
> "Both lenses shoot neutral color without a filter installed"
Ok, I'll bite -
why do they come with a filter installed then?
Kenneth Waller
And why a Neutral filter AND a L39 filter, which is a UV filter, both
being without any effect on the color balance?
Andre
One day, between calls, I looked over at my bike, and something about
it looked particularly fetching (to me, at least). I took my camera
out of my bag, and this is what it saw:
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=2938717&size=lg
Your comments are always welcome, and I thank those in adv
WOW! I can't compete with that razor wit. I'll just
have to be more vigilant in checking the sender prior
to accessing the message.
Jack
--- William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Jack Davis"
> Subject: Re: MZ-S
>
>
> > I'm not a slave to the latest
- Original Message -
From: "Jack Davis"
Subject: Re: MZ-S
You are a 'pill'.
You sure are a testy fuck for someone who has to ask a stupid
question like "why should I buy a camera?" on a camera mailing list.
If you don't like the answer, ignore it.
If you want a flame war, come and get i
because the optical design of the lens requires and takes into account the
fact that a filter is there. filters in front of a lens alter the optical
properties of the system too. it's just that it should be too small to
notice. in the middle, it's a different story.
Herb...
- Original Message
Geez, William... Off your meds?
t
On 12/6/04 15:59, William Robb wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Jack Davis"
> Subject: Re: MZ-S
>
>
>> You are a 'pill'.
>
> You sure are a testy fuck for someone who has to ask a stupid
> question like "why should I buy a camera?" on a came
Frank
it looks like road rash from a roll over.
Either that or its the musical score from the First Noel.
I assume Pista is the model name?
FWIW, I'd be more intrigued by the image if it was more abstract and showed
less of the rest of the bike, maybe just the handle bars.
Kenneth Waller
-
Bill just woke up.let's hope Blakely doesn't stir.
Norm
William Robb wrote:
From: "Jack Davis"
Subject: Re: MZ-S
You are a 'pill'.
You sure are a testy fuck for someone who has to ask a stupid question
like "why should I buy a camera?" on a camera mailing list.
If you don't like the answer, i
And have you observed the difference with & without the "middle filter" in
place?
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: "Herb Chong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, December 06, 2004 7:05 PM
Subject: Re: another filter question: FA* 300mm F2.8
> because the
My apologies for infiltrating the group. I don't shoot with a Pentax, I
shoot with a Canon.
There, I got it off my chest.
Wait, it gets worse, it's a Canon digital.
Now the bit where I try and score some brownie points. I love using manual
focus (mostly because it's more acurate) and The Takuma
On Mon, 6 Dec 2004 19:07:35 -0500, Kenneth Waller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Frank
> it looks like road rash from a roll over.
> Either that or its the musical score from the First Noel.
>
> I assume Pista is the model name?
>
> FWIW, I'd be more intrigued by the image if it was more abstract a
1 - 100 of 160 matches
Mail list logo
