On 27 Feb 2003 at 0:26, Mike Johnston wrote:
> > Don't count on ISO 50 - if this is the same chip as the D100 slowest
> > ISO is 200. But I believe it does go to 1600.
>
>
> That's not chip-dependent, that's circuitry-dependent, I'm pretty sure.
It's both, the chip has inherent noise as do the
Dan Scott a écrit:
>
> On Wednesday, February 26, 2003, at 10:26 AM, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
wrote:
>
>> Flash sync to slow at 1/150,damn.Nice to see it takes just about any
>> Pentax
>> lens though.
>>
>> Dave Brooks
>>
>
>
> Perhaps it goes higher with the last flash Pentax released. The
> something
Dnia 26-02-2003 o godz. 19:39 Bruce Dayton napisał(a):
> GLM> http://cgi.ebay.com/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?
ViewItem&item=2914463658&category=15240
> Yuck!
I second that! For me - awfull...
Maciej
Konkurs "Europa Moich Marzeń". Wygra
Alan,
That is only useful if you can preview the shot. Because of the SLR
nature - the mirror/prism in the way, you can't preview the shot. None
of the existing DSLR's have a swing LCD - no benefit except to break
easier.
Bruce
Thursday, February 27, 2003, 12:19:10 AM, you wrote:
AC> Where'
On 27 Feb 2003 at 0:23, Alan Chan wrote:
> Perhaps for uploading pictures through USB. Press it once and it will upload
> everything to the PC.
I guess: press it once and a white balance offset will be set that will be
applied to subsequent captured images. Welcome to the world of direct digital
how long ago was the *ist announced and still no show on their site
now the *ist D is announced and again a no show
h
I want one.
This is just what I wanted: a DSLR which can take my macro lens without
requiring a mortgage to do so.
Cheers,
- Dave
http://www.digistar.com/~dmann/
Comrades!
http://www.digitalcamera.jp/html/HotNews/image/2003-02/27/ist-D-1L.jpg
http://www.digitalcamera.jp/html/HotNews/image/2003-02/27/ist-D-2L.jpg
Wow!
Ken
Well aren't they just something else. You have just made my day, must get
going to work!
Ziggy
Well, I saw the Starship Enterprise coming up on the starboard bow, so here
I am. Very glad that I waited, nearly gave up in December, as you say very
interesting times ahead.
Ziggy
-Original Message-
Hi Ziggy,
You picked a right moment to de-cloak! I guess I was in the same
situation
subjective comments
very sharp, great bokeh almost 3d in appearance.
very useful range-the zooming macro is great for flowers and native plants.
also good for lizards and frogs in aquariums (larger ones lol)
i got this one for a cool $1500 Australia a couple of days ago. the first
means it is now a 600m f4 or 1020mm f7,5 with the af 1.7 convertor
mmm i am so happy
BTW sharper pictures than the pentax fa 300mm 4.5 but ever so heavy
LOL Alan!
Well, what do you expect - the anticipation got the better of us for a
while there...
> -Original Message-
> From: Alan Chan [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 27 February 2003 08:19
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: *ist D photos
>
>
> Where's the swing LCD? Isn't it use
I think price coule be the real key here. The 10D is a significant
(that is an understatement) step up from the D60 and may well be the
start of a new market segment between the current two tiers that we have
been used to. The question in my mind is what Canon's second body will
have, and at what
> Interpolation,
>either by the camera, computer or printer (can printers interpolate images
>on their own?), can add more data to the file so it can be printed larger,
>but quality starts to drop off then.
I'd say that this is indiscernable using modern inkjet printers.
Cotty
__
more pics at http://www.dpreview.com/news/0302/03022602pentaxistd.asp
Ramesh
-Original Message-
From: Bruce Dayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2003 3:33 AM
To: Alan Chan
Subject: Re: *ist D photos
Alan,
That is only useful if you can preview the shot. Becaus
>Does this mean that I can take credit for Pentax finally getting off
>their ass just to get even with me?
Sure. Leaked info from Pentax Board Room meetings mention 'The Rubenstein
Manoeuver'...
Cotty
Oh, swipe me! He paints with light!
http://www.macads.co
Finally!
Very nice indeed.
That camera is SMALL.
Sorry, that should read:
THAT CAMERA IS small.
Cotty
Oh, swipe me! He paints with light!
http://www.macads.co.uk/snaps/
Free UK Macintosh Classified Ads at
http:/
Wheels a la PZ-1p! What a disappointment... impacts significantly on
the design and makes it more of a C/N clone. The film *ist is more
stylish and distinguishable.
The external finish reminds me of the MZ-S. Can we hope for
magnesium alloy... ?
I'm also intrigued by the button above
on 27.02.03 10:32, Rob Studdert at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> I guess: press it once and a white balance offset will be set that will be
> applied to subsequent captured images. Welcome to the world of direct digital
> image capture.
>
For sure you have to point at the neutral colour surface, the
Dnia 26-02-2003 o godz. 23:15 Chris Brogden napisal:
> The myth about digital offering more DOF is partly true,
though. To get a
> DSLR lens that magnifies things as much as a 50mm lens for a
35mm film
> camera does, you'll need to go with a DSLR lens with a focal
length of
> roughly 35mm (ass
on 27.02.03 10:29, Nagaraj, Ramesh at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> more pics at http://www.dpreview.com/news/0302/03022602pentaxistd.asp
>
Have you seen lens sunshade? It is petal type - this means that this new
wide zoom has IF (internal focusing) and thus doesn't rotate its front!
--
Best Regar
On 27 Feb 2003 at 11:03, Sylwester Pietrzyk wrote:
> on 27.02.03 10:32, Rob Studdert at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > I guess: press it once and a white balance offset will be set that will be
> > applied to subsequent captured images. Welcome to the world of direct digital
> > image capture.
>
all this excitement has left me wondering if leica and panosonic will
release a digital slr mm
heaven only if i could get pentax 43mm and 77mm in lecia r mount
Have you noticed texture on surfaces of D *ist? It is very similar to the
one on MZ-S. Could it be that it is build of magnesium-alloy, or is it
simply imitation? I guess it is imitation, but who knows?
--
Best Regards
Sylwek
At last - someone else has noticed!
I was beginning to think I was imaginining it!
I have looked long and hard, and am now fairly sure (especially when
looking at the relected light on the surface) that this IS magnesium
like the MZ-S.
DOUBLE, TRIPLE, QUADRUPLE WOWW!
> -Original Message
on 27.02.03 11:25, Rob Brigham at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> At last - someone else has noticed!
>
> I was beginning to think I was imaginining it!
>
> I have looked long and hard, and am now fairly sure (especially when
> looking at the relected light on the surface) that this IS magnesium
> li
Hi all,
here is this Thursday's FS offer to the list - whatever'll be left will go
the ebay way. Please contact me off-list if interested (got JPG's
too).Prices do not include shipping - which is on the cheap side though.
LENS:
Pentax SMC-M 85mm f2 complete with original hard case, dedicated hood
Hi!
My ME Super has arrived yesterday. Since I drove to Jerusalem to shoot
some snow I couldn't really take full advantage of it...
Anyway, camera appears in condition exactly as advertised. I loaded
the film and took some shots. Though darker than ZX-L's, but with that
single element lens it is
please add to the previously posted FS list:
one Neat mini (table) Manfrotto (=Bogen) all-metal tripod complete with head
and quick release plate. Like New- 25$.
Daphne
Dnia 27-02-2003 o godz. 2:23 Mike Johnston napisal:
it takes
> > ORDINARY AA BATTERIES... you know, the kind you can buy in
just about
> > any small shop, anywhere in the world :-)
>
> Kristian,
> I agree with this. Rechargeable NiMH batteries are efficient,
cost
> effective, and environmentall
Dear all,
more photos of *ist-D can be found in dpreview.com:
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0302/pma2003/pentax/istd-01.jpg
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0302/pma2003/pentax/istd-02.jpg
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0302/pma2003/pentax/istd-03.jpg
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0302/pma2003/pentax/ist
Man, I dropped off the list in frustration a few months ago but my
faith is renewed with the sneak peek... thank God I held on to my
Pentax glass and invested very little in Canon glass for my D30! Having
said that, my only regret is that I won't be able to carry over my
70-200/f4 "L" lens... t
Black is good... that silver body reminds me too much of a cheap EOS
Kiss...
On Thursday, February 27, 2003, at 07:51 PM,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
And it is black !!
> At last - someone else has noticed!
>
> I was beginning to think I was imaginining it!
>
Me too :-) I guess we won't have much to complain about. That is, ff the
price is right, the pictures come out fine and the camera really
materializes in shops...
What I'd really like to see is *ist D's fil
I've just fallen in love with this camera. Its an excellent combinations of
both MZ-like and Z-like designs.
WOW
Regards
Artur
- Original Message -
From: "KT Takeshita" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Pentax Discuss" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2003 2:50 AM
Subject: *ist D pho
On 27 Feb 2003 at 18:54, Iren & Henry Chu wrote:
> The white balance is set on the top left dial. Hence, the purpose of the
> mysterious button above the AF selector switch in the left size of lens
> mount is still unknown. My bet is still on activating the "image
> stabilizing" function (to
Message text written by INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
><
Hi People
Interesting times.and I've just finally acquired an LX
to join the 2 MXs, ME super and bag of Pentax primes I've had since the
80s! Looks like I NOW haven't got ANY excuse to ignore the digital world
Wow!
Looks really good, two wheels a bit like the PZ-1p ...
And my 31mm and 77mm limiteds in black look like a perfect match :-)
Regards, JvW
On Wed, 26 Feb 2003 21:09:23 EST, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>> http://www.digitalcamera.jp/html/HotNews/image/2003-02/27/ist-D-1L.jpg
>>
>> http
On Thu, 27 Feb 2003 22:30:33 +1000, Rob Studdert <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
Come on guys, the mystery isn't, see the section "Manual White Balance"
in the following page:
http://www.dpreview.com/reviews/olympuse10/page6.asp
You are right for sure.
Pentax already has used this symbol in Optio m
I think Dario B. tried to tell us last week. It was 3 by 3 with two 'wings'
on the horizontal direction. Bob S.
> Dumb question, anyone know whatth 11 sensor AF
> pattern is, I've seem the metering but not AF sensor
> placement, anyone know or did I miss something.
On 27 Feb 2003 at 14:05, Alin Flaider wrote:
>
> According to Chasseur d'Images, the *istd sports the same Sony CCD
> used in N* D100. So, looking at some D100 samples hints to the image
> quality in *istd. There is no reason Pentax won't do at least as
> good as D100 - an year later.
>
On Thu, 27 Feb 2003 00:21:28 -0600, you wrote:
>So, yes, the 50mm lens on an APS sized sensor would have the same angle of
>view, d.o.f. at same aperture, perspective, and "flattening" effect as a
>piece of 35mm film cropped. But so would a 75mm lens on a full-sized piece
>of 35mm film.
>
>Hope th
- Original Message -
Subject: Re: pentax-discuss-d Digest V03 #11
>
> On Wednesday, Feb 26, 2003, at 22:02 US/Pacific,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Thats cause Ricoh put a pin where Pentax specified an
> > AF shaft, not Pentaxes fault Ricoh didn't want to
> > follow the KA mount cor
- Original Message -
From: "adphoto"
Subject: now just a leica R9d would just be heaven
> heaven only if i could get pentax 43mm and 77mm in lecia r mount
And the point of that would be??
William Robb
Message text written by INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
><
Hi Rob
Yep the lug bit, you shouldn't have sent me those pix, I just can't get on
with the sideways strap thing...
Clive
Photo.net reflects the attitude of the general photographic community,
particularly in America, towards all camera brands including Pentax.
Don't worry, Pop Photog will be all excited.
BR
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
how long ago was the *ist announced and still no show on their site
now the *ist
Good, now I can scratch off "make major contribution to humanity" off my
to-do list.
BR
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Sure. Leaked info from Pentax Board Room meetings mention 'The Rubenstein
Manoeuver'...
On February 27, 2003 07:34 am, John Mustarde wrote:
> On Thu, 27 Feb 2003 00:21:28 -0600, you wrote:
> >So, yes, the 50mm lens on an APS sized sensor would have the same angle of
> >view, d.o.f. at same aperture, perspective, and "flattening" effect as a
> >piece of 35mm film cropped. But so would
"J. C. O'Connell" wrote:
>
> >
> > My brain does not process icons well. I still find it a 50-50 proposition
> > selecting between O and I when I want to power on new computer
> > equipment - I
> > have no idea if O means On or empty or Off or what.
>
> Those are not O & I, they are 0 (zero ) a
What ISO spec?
There are a ton of ISO specs, aren't there?
keith
Herb Chong wrote:
>
> have you read the ISO spec?
>
> Herb...
> - Original Message -
> From: "J. C. O'Connell" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2003 02:42
> Subject: RE: *ist D
In a message dated 2/27/03 3:31:46 AM Central Standard Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> more pics at http://www.dpreview.com/news/0302/03022602pentaxistd.asp
>
> Ramesh
Bear in mind that Cd'I were the ones who said categorically that Pentax
would have nothing at all to show at PMA!
I am 99% sure they have no more idea than us whether the body is plastic
or not - I bet they havent seen one other than the pics we have posted.
> -Original Message-
> From: A
After looking at some pictures of the *ist-D on "DPReview" I rather
think it is for allowing the camera to communicate with ones computer
when it is necessary to upload images.
On the majority of digital cameras there is a 'play' mode and one has to
switch the camera into that mode before it will
Rob wrote:
RS> Hmm, they don't seem so confident about the proposed release date.
They are quite reserved after the warm welcome they made to the
- later aborted - digital MZ-S. We should all take example.
Servus, Alin
On Thu, 27 Feb 2003 09:20:07 -, Rob Brigham wrote:
>
>Now I really want to know what the body on the *ist D is made of - it
>truly looks magnesium to me!
I think it is plastic, first because of the expected low pricing and
second because of how it looks here:
http://www.digitalcamera
Michel Adam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>In marketingspeak, 'effective' might as well mean 'we are faking it'.
>
>But it sounds better.
>
>If there is real vanilla in your ice cream, you can be sure that the marketing
>droid who will design the label on the packaging, and the publicity campaing
>wi
Let's hope the battery life (is there a rechargable???) is as good as
Canon's.
I can get by on a day's shoot of a 340 MB microdrive filled twice on a
pair of batteries loaded up in the battery grip and using an external
flash.
Cheers.
On Thursday, February 27, 2003, at 09:25 PM,
[EMAIL PROT
> > Not really. The fact that the 50 has a field of view more like a 75 is
> > created by cropping, not optical zooming. In effect, the
> > less-than-24x36 image sensor size means that there's a permanently
> > enabled digital zoom feature on the camera.
> >
> > All you're doing is cropping. T
Was this pricing confirmed anywhere? I didn't see any mention of it...
if it's under US$2,000, it's going to be *total* steal!
On Thursday, February 27, 2003, at 09:25 PM,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Also, according to the same source the body is plastic, thus
justifying the expectedly low pr
Excellent example for proof. Thanks,
keith
Rob Studdert wrote:
>
> On 27 Feb 2003 at 13:13, Alin Flaider wrote:
>
> > Henry wrote:
> >
> > IHC> My bet is still on activating the "image
> > IHC> stabilizing" function (to prevent problems with the power zoom contacts on
> > IHC> the lens mount).
Pat White <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Optically, the Sigma is very good. I'm pleased with mine. I'm sure the
>Pentax is just as good, if not better. There are quite a few physical
>differences, though.
>
>The Pentax lens is around an inch longer, a little heavier, and focuses 40cm
>closer (140c
> Well, it is hard to tell, whether the K85/f1.8 or the M85/f2 make nicer
> portraits. All I can say is that
> - stooped down my M85/f2 has a slightly higher resolution at portrait
> distance then my K85/f1.8
Hmmm. How far do you stop down for portraits? I personally don't like
much DOF, and I
Dear all,
Thanks for correcting my error because I never own an Olympus nor Optio
digicam. The marking for white balance on my canon ixus is just "WB".
I will be so disappointed if Pentax doesn't take this opportunity to launch
KAF3
Henry Chu
27/2/2003
From: Keith Whaley <[EMAIL PROTECTED
Mike Johnston <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I really beg to differ. This would not be dumb at all, it would be SMART.
>Canon and Nikon have already started doing it (Canon's digital-only lenses
>are expected at this PMA or in Japan). One of the MAJOR advantages of
>digital is that you can get high q
> Who the hell cares?!?!?! We got a DLSR to use with Pentax
> lenses!!! WAHOOO!
This has been my number one (photo) thought for the last day or so.
;-) ;-) ;-) ;-) ;-) ;-) ;-) ;-) ;-) ;-) ;-) ;-) ;-)
Fred
As far back as I can recall, my first published photograph was a
product shot for my former employer's web site. I think you can still
see it here:
http://www.didi.com/www/areas/products/monkey2/MK1/index.html
I was doing engineering work on the Monkey2 at that time as well as
taking a class i
"Iren & Henry Chu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Thanks for correcting my error because I never own an Olympus nor Optio
>digicam. The marking for white balance on my canon ixus is just "WB".
>
>I will be so disappointed if Pentax doesn't take this opportunity to launch
>KAF3
I dunno. The DS
Another question ...
The release-button on the *ist D looks pretty much like the MZ-S one I think.
However, I do not see if a DOF function is on there too.
Anyone seen something related to DOF-preview yet ?
Release button shows clearly at:
http://www.digitalcamera.jp/html/HotNews/image
I know that it must be done only unintentionally by PDML-ers that
subscribe to the digest version, but posting to the PDML with
subject lines with the "pentax-discuss-d Digest Vnn #nn" format (by
replying to digest messages without fixing the subject line) is not
very helpful.
I would assume that
Hi all.
I'm sure i'm repeating something everyone knows but from
experience with the D1 now for a year and a half,dust and
ccd's dont mix well.
I try to change my lenses in as dust free an area as possible.Couple
of times i have had some nice pics ruined by a big dust blob.Not many
but a few.
Somt
There's a button marked "DPOF" on the back:
http://www.digitalcamera.jp/html/HotNews/image/2003-02/27/ist-D-2L.jpg
Would this be depth of field?
Bill
- Original Message -
From: "Jan van Wijk" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, February 27, 2003 9:20 AM
Subject:
Alin wrote:
> Wheels a la PZ-1p! What a disappointment... impacts significantly on
> the design and makes it more of a C/N clone. The film *ist is more
> stylish and distinguishable.
I agree. I have no doubt that it will appeal to people sitting on old K-mount glass,
but it won't steal a s
Sylwester wrote:
> Have you noticed texture on surfaces of D *ist? It is very similar to the
> one on MZ-S. Could it be that it is build of magnesium-alloy, or is it
> simply imitation? I guess it is imitation, but who knows?
So is the 645NII but it is still plastic.
Pål
John wrote:
> And the 600/4 with 1.4XL teleconverter becomes an amazing 1260mm/f4
> lens. Drool city for this telephoto aficionado.
...and with 50% reduction in resolution for the lens alone + the reduction of the
converter. I'm sorry, but the FA* 600/4 isn't that good.
Pål
Rob wrote:
> Hmm, they don't seem so confident about the proposed release date.
But they are certified morons anyway, so who cares?
Pål
Robert wrote:
> After seeing the *ist D photos, which has some MZ-S influence, I bet you can
> see the flagship slr.
Huh? You mean the Pentax flagship should be a Nikon F80 clone? I'll certainly be
dissapointed
>Pentax will fix the MZ-S problemsadd aperature
> control, the great PZ
Mike wrote:
> I will be surprised and disappointed if Pentax doesn't follow through with
> at least a limited series of lenses specifically for the *ist D. This is
> exactly what is needed in digital photography, not the continued application
> of vestigial technology that's clearly on the way out
That gets both my thumbs up! If God had given me a few more thumbs it would
get them too... But unfortunately I've only got two.
But then you wouldn't be able to operate a camera...you'd be all thumbs
BUTCH
Each man had only one genuine vocation - to find the way to himself.
Hermann Hess (Dami
Could anyone tell me whether this Sigma lens (or, in fact, the
current Sigma line of Pentax mount lenses) focuses "Pentax-style" or
in the reverse direction, when focused manually?
I've been quite happy with the A 70-210/4 for a fairly compact
moderate telephoto zoom, and I also like using the man
> 300/2.8 sounds about normal to me, for effective FOV of 450mm.
> For a wider angle I'd choose a K 200/2.5.
...must be a birder... ;-)
Fred
Look at http://www.dpreview.com/news/0302/pma2003/pentax/istd-03.jpg -
its on the shutter release like MZ-S. This is a wonderful system and I
am glad they kept with it!
> -Original Message-
> From: Jan van Wijk [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 27 February 2003 14:20
> To: [EMAIL PROTECT
It wouldn't be half bad if it sold like F80s.
BR
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Instead we got something that looks like a Nikon F80.
I just got in, saw the pictures and read the reactions. It's a pretty
beast, and I dying to see some sample images. They managed to push many
of the right buttons and if the price is OK a lot of Pentax users are
going to want one. One question I have is availability. I remember
that folks wher
Bruce wrote:
> It wouldn't be half bad if it sold like F80s.
But why should it? It is not that the *Ist D is bad in any way. But it is an also ran
looking like a F80 with sensor of a one year old Nikon DSLR. The only selling point
will be price. Lets just hope that the compettition does not p
The 10D with its higher grade body, features and very well proven
pedigree now adds excellent high ISO quality and will list at under
$2000. You are right - the Pentax better be cheap (and good) to scoop
anyone not already tied to the K mount!
> -Original Message-
> From: Pål Jensen [mail
Any guesses as to what this is going to be?
Ziggy
Nope, it's Digital Print Order Format. For a brief overview, see
http://www.dpreview.com/learn/Glossary/Camera_System/DPOF_01.htm
chris
On Thu, 27 Feb 2003, Bill Owens wrote:
> There's a button marked "DPOF" on the back:
>
> http://www.digitalcamera.jp/html/HotNews/image/2003-02/27/ist-D-2L.
> * Convenient playback functions, such as nine imageand 12X
> magnification-display
gimmicks
Actually this cna be handy. I use it on the E-10 since its hard to
judge details on a 1.5 in screen. The preview thing is a big part of
digital.
Steven Desjardins
Department of Chemistry
Washin
>What's a Hyper button?
Someone's already pressed it ;-)
This list has gone nuts!
Cotty
Nope, just plain crazy..
Ziggy
I bought my Pentax 20-35 f4 with a "digital normal" mode in mind. It
also opened up the whole wide angle shooting approach for me. I thought
I would use this thing occasionally, and it turned into my main lens in
Ireland. Until then, I was a normal/short tele kind of guy. ;-)
Steven Desjardins
Sure they will. This way it still won't match the limited lenses (not
that this bothers me).
Steven Desjardins
Department of Chemistry
Washington and Lee University
Lexington, VA 24450
(540) 458-8873
FAX: (540) 458-8878
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] 02/27/03 10:44AM >>>
http://www.e
So, how many of you merry people are going to get an *ist-D and if not why
not?
To start the ball rolling you can count me as a taker.
Ziggy
I think it will be the range of available ISO speeds that you can set on
the camera.
Sorry, couldn't resist - its been a long day!
> -Original Message-
> From: zoomshot [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 27 February 2003 16:13
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: *ist D ISO range
>
>
> An
I'm in!
Christian
On Thursday 27 February 2003 11:21, zoomshot wrote:
> So, how many of you merry people are going to get an *ist-D and if not why
> not?
>
> To start the ball rolling you can count me as a taker.
>
> Ziggy
Ed Matthew wrote:
>
> A favor, please - will someone send me the link to the picture/description
> of the D*ist? I deleted too soon :-(
Try one of these:
http://www.digitalcamera.jp/html/HotNews/image/2003-02/27/ist-D-2L.jpg
http://www.digitalcamera.jp/html/HotNews/image/2003-02/27/ist-D-1L.j
I cannot afford a camera whose street price is anywhere near $2000.
Nor $1500, for that matter.
I might buy one near $1000, but some equipment would have to go first.
So, covet as I might, a new *ist D is very probably not on my buy list
this year! No way I can justify an outlay like that for a thi
Ziggy wrote:
> So, how many of you merry people are going to get an *ist-D and if not why
> not?
I won't buy it for the following reasons:
- It is just a Nikon F80 with K-mount. The F80 has never tempted me the slightest.
- It will be outdated in six months.
- It will be too expensive as long as
I know what you mean, can't wait for the weekend to get here.
I hope that ISO 100 - ISO 1000 is covered and that we don't get a lot of
noise on ISO 800
Ziggy
-Original Message-
From: Rob Brigham [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 27 February 2003 16:17
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:
> -Original Message-
> From: zoomshot [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
>
> So, how many of you merry people are going to get an *ist-D
> and if not why
> not?
>
Undecided.
I won't use it professionally (res too low compared to what I use
now), and I'm not sure I'd want or need it for personal
It would also be amusing to see an M37 asahiflex lens on a *ist digital. I
believe there were M37 - M42 adapters which could then be mounted in an
M42 - K mount adapter.
Paul Ewins
Melbourne, Australia
Hard to find. Still looking for one after years of semi-intensive searching.
Andre
--
1 - 100 of 310 matches
Mail list logo
