Walt
On 2/8/2012 2:14 AM, Theodore Beilby wrote:
Between all the computer problems we have had this year, and all the miles I
drove to take pictures, I guess that I should post some. I have added some new
pages to my website: www.beilbyvisualarts.com
Index for Roadtrip 2011
; drove to take pictures, I guess that I should post some. I have added some new
> pages to my website: www.beilbyvisualarts.com
>
> Index for Roadtrip 2011 http://www.beilbyvisualarts.com/id28.html
>
> shots from Arches National Park, Canyonlands NP., California and
&
Quoting Theodore Beilby :
Between all the computer problems we have had this year, and all the miles I
drove to take pictures, I guess that I should post some. I have
added some new
pages to my website: www.beilbyvisualarts.com
Index for Roadtrip 2011 http://www.beilbyvisualarts.com
Between all the computer problems we have had this year, and all the miles I
drove to take pictures, I guess that I should post some. I have added some new
pages to my website: www.beilbyvisualarts.com
Index for Roadtrip 2011 http://www.beilbyvisualarts.com/id28.html
shots
Just saw a couple of questions about not wanting to hear the sound on
my website (www.andrewallenphoto.com) as the opening slideshow plays.
If you take your mouse and hover over the shot being displayed in the
slideshow, there is a mute button you can press to turn off the music
- I know not
Well done, Luka. I may only add that for some reason (or was it
intentional) I had to press Back button of my browser when looking at
your pictures. This is fine but given the really excellent front page
there is a bit of dis-balance here. May be some most simple wrapping of
your photos could b
On 23 October 2010 07:27, Luka Knezevic-Strika wrote:
> thx guys, i'm glad you like it. the problem with no links, as my
> friend who did the technical part of the website informed me, is due
> of inability of fancybox to operate that way. if someone has the idea
> how to keep the same simple slid
On 23 October 2010 22:27, Luka Knezevic-Strika wrote:
> thx guys, i'm glad you like it. the problem with no links, as my
> friend who did the technical part of the website informed me, is due
> of inability of fancybox to operate that way. if someone has the idea
> how to keep the same simple slid
thx guys, i'm glad you like it. the problem with no links, as my
friend who did the technical part of the website informed me, is due
of inability of fancybox to operate that way. if someone has the idea
how to keep the same simple slideshow (no transitions, no nothing) and
add this as an option, i
On 22/10/2010 8:20 PM, Luka Knezevic-Strika wrote:
www.lukaknezevicstrika.com
my first website. c and c welcome!
I've always liked your photos, Luka. Rich, mysterious and very human.
Seeing them in together here in series is an order of magnitude more
rewarding.
--
der...@iinet.net.au
> www.lukaknezevicstrika.com
>
> my first website. c and c welcome!
really good site, even better photos.
B
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directio
On 10-10-22 5:20 AM, Luka Knezevic-Strika wrote:
www.lukaknezevicstrika.com
my first website. c and c welcome!
Elegant design. Showcases your work very well. I like it!
Two thumbs up.
-bmw
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUB
> Den 22. okt. 2010 kl. 11.20 skrev Luka Knezevic-Strika:
>
> www.lukaknezevicstrika.com
>
> my first website. c and c welcome!
Good stuff, Luka. Simple, sparse, and no overbearing use of Flash. It
seems to match your Photography style quite well. Lovely intimate
portraits of your partner and Life
Very nice cite and pictures. I like the symbols and the very minimalist
approach in the galleries.
The only objection is that I was a little confused by the red "portfolio" text
at the bottom of the home-page. At first I thought that was the only pictures
at the site.
DagT
http://www.thrane.n
Nice web site. Good photography.
Very interesting idea to put your portfolio up as a PDF document.
On Fri, Oct 22, 2010 at 4:36 AM, eckinator wrote:
> nice. like the link symbols. have liked your work since day one. please add
> more
> thanks for sharing
> ecke
>
> 2010/10/22 Luka Knezevic-Stri
nice. like the link symbols. have liked your work since day one. please add more
thanks for sharing
ecke
2010/10/22 Luka Knezevic-Strika :
> www.lukaknezevicstrika.com
>
> my first website. c and c welcome!
>
> --
> PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> PDML@pdml.net
> http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/p
www.lukaknezevicstrika.com
my first website. c and c welcome!
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
to UNSUBSCRIBE from the PDML, please visit the link directly above and follow
the directions.
On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 3:28 PM, Toine wrote:
> I wasted a lot of time in rebuilding my website. My images live inside
> the SSP Director database and allways needed flash to see the
> daylight. Flash didn't leave but I have found a way to pull the images
> from the database wit
Sounds like a cool idea (someone stealing my pictures because they
like it). I would prefer if they ask first... Maybe I should use
watermarkings.
Toine
2010/1/19 Boris Liberman :
> Toine, it looks cool and works cool but for whatever it is worth, if you
> middle click (click with the rolling whe
:28 PM, Toine wrote:
I wasted a lot of time in rebuilding my website. My images live inside
the SSP Director database and allways needed flash to see the
daylight. Flash didn't leave but I have found a way to pull the images
from the database without flash. Maybe that's good news.
Now I ne
I wasted a lot of time in rebuilding my website. My images live inside
the SSP Director database and allways needed flash to see the
daylight. Flash didn't leave but I have found a way to pull the images
from the database without flash. Maybe that's good news.
Now I need to find my
- Original Message -
From: "David J Brooks"
Subject: Re: My website ponder
> I have posted on the BB a number of times, that posting pictures taken
> from sites or not paid for is against the BB rules. Maybe part of that
> message is getting through, as they, for
Kenneth Waller wrote:
> I'm under the impression that there is no way to stop someone from
> "stealing" an image posted on the web.
Logically, it couldn't be any other way. To view it in a browser, the
image has to be downloaded. At that point, it's out of the web server's
control. Now, you co
law.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: "David J Brooks" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: My website ponder
> Last year a few people sent me a right click script to help in web
> theft. I could not seem to get it to work, mostlikly not putting it
> exactly in the ri
As others have mentioned, it's very hard to display images on the web
in a "nick-proof" way. Even if you embed them in a Flash-application
or similar, people can take screendumps.
There's a balance. Business lost to theft on one side, business gained
by increased exposure through the credits and t
Actually it just makes it annoying enough that most normal geeks will
decide it's not worth it.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> In a message dated 6/12/2007 9:50:28 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> On 12/6/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED], discombobulated, unleashed:
>
>
>> Right c
Not sure, but i would say some at least.
Dave
On 6/12/07, AlunFoto <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I don't really know what to think, Dave. Are you losing business from
> this practice, do you think?
>
> Jostein
>
> 2007/6/12, David J Brooks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> > Last year a few people sent me a
On 6/12/07, ann sanfedele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> David J Brooks wrote:
>
> >Last year a few people sent me a right click script to help in web
> >theft. I could not seem to get it to work, mostlikly not putting it
> >exactly in the right spot.
> >
> >Now here is something to ponder.
> >
> >I
In a message dated 6/12/2007 9:50:28 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
On 12/6/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED], discombobulated, unleashed:
>Right click protection usually means if you right click the Save Picture
As
>and Save Target As are grayed out, disabled. So it makes it h
On 12/6/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED], discombobulated, unleashed:
>Right click protection usually means if you right click the Save Picture As
>and Save Target As are grayed out, disabled. So it makes it harder to
>download a pic and save it. Not impossible, but a lot harder.
I challenge anyone to
In a message dated 6/12/2007 6:46:00 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
At smugmug I have "right click protection" checked which I thought meant
that someone could try to
print them out but they would come up blank.
ann
Right click protection usually means
>
> From: ann sanfedele <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2007/06/12 Tue PM 01:42:03 GMT
> To: Pentax-Discuss Mail List
> Subject: Re: My website ponder
>
> David J Brooks wrote:
>
> >Last year a few people sent me a right click script to help in web
> >
- Original Message -
From: "David J Brooks"
Subject: My website ponder
> Last year a few people sent me a right click script to help in web
> theft. I could not seem to get it to work, mostlikly not putting it
> exactly in the right spot.
>
> Now here is someth
David J Brooks wrote:
>Last year a few people sent me a right click script to help in web
>theft. I could not seem to get it to work, mostlikly not putting it
>exactly in the right spot.
>
>Now here is something to ponder.
>
>I have been on a few Weshots albums lately and i notice that, although
>
David J Brooks wrote:
> I have been on a few Weshots albums lately and i notice that, although
> my thumbs are still being taken and used to show their friends, even
> with copy right statment, they are giving photo credit and website
> info along with the photo.
Maybe that script is working on t
I don't really know what to think, Dave. Are you losing business from
this practice, do you think?
Jostein
2007/6/12, David J Brooks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Last year a few people sent me a right click script to help in web
> theft. I could not seem to get it to work, mostlikly not putting it
> ex
Last year a few people sent me a right click script to help in web
theft. I could not seem to get it to work, mostlikly not putting it
exactly in the right spot.
Now here is something to ponder.
I have been on a few Weshots albums lately and i notice that, although
my thumbs are still being taken
On Wed, 30 Jun 2004, Albano Garcia wrote:
> I'm still here, but my job (quitting soon), university
> and girlfriend leaves few space for pdml.
> Just wanted to let you know that my website has moved
> to a new domain:
>
> http://www.albanogarcia.com.ar
Albano,
I was
:(:(:(:(:(:(:(:(:(:(:(:(:(:>:<:<:<:<:<:<:<:<:<:<:":L":":":":
Norm Baugher wrote:
Jjowlkj kljo know sanxz, oiuer noikt lkje?
Norm
Anders Hultman wrote:
On Thu, 1 Jul 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Er det ønskelig med flere språk nå, eller blir det bare sært med
nors
Jjowlkj kljo know sanxz, oiuer noikt lkje?
Norm
Anders Hultman wrote:
On Thu, 1 Jul 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Er det ønskelig med flere språk nå, eller blir det bare sært med
norske bokstaver?
De norska tecknen ser helt okej ut härifrån, men jag är kanske partisk :-)
anders
On Thu, 1 Jul 2004 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Er det ønskelig med flere språk nå, eller blir det bare sært med
> norske bokstaver?
De norska tecknen ser helt okej ut härifrån, men jag är kanske partisk :-)
anders
-
http://anders.hultman.nu/
med dagens bild och allt!
Er det ønskelig med flere språk nå, eller blir det bare sært med norske bokstaver?
DagT
> Fra: Kostas Kavoussanakis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>
> On Thu, 1 Jul 2004, Markus Maurer wrote:
>
> > Antonio
> > du bisch würklich än Sibesiech, zeigsch eus jedesmal, was du alles chasch,
> > gäll!
> > Markus
On Thu, 1 Jul 2004, Markus Maurer wrote:
> Antonio
> du bisch würklich än Sibesiech, zeigsch eus jedesmal, was du alles chasch,
> gäll!
> Markus
>
> > Ah, ¡justo ayer estaba mirando un Rollieflex 2.8F en eBay! No se si
> Es una forma que siempre me
> > ha gustado, y ahora mas.
> >
> > Saludos,
>
Antonio
du bisch würklich än Sibesiech, zeigsch eus jedesmal, was du alles chasch,
gäll!
Markus
> Ah, ¡justo ayer estaba mirando un Rollieflex 2.8F en eBay! No se si
Es una forma que siempre me
> ha gustado, y ahora mas.
>
> Saludos,
> Antonio
ecialment
buenas. Que ustaste un 6x6?
Saludos,
Antonio
On 30 Jun 2004, at 22:06, Albano Garcia wrote:
Hi gang,
I'm still here, but my job (quitting soon),
university
and girlfriend leaves few space for pdml.
Just wanted to let you know that my website has
moved
to a new domain:
http://www.alba
as fotos de la señora mayor y su casa
> son especialment
> buenas. Que ustaste un 6x6?
>
> Saludos,
> Antonio
>
> On 30 Jun 2004, at 22:06, Albano Garcia wrote:
>
> > Hi gang,
> > I'm still here, but my job (quitting soon),
> university
> > and gi
uenas. Que ustaste un 6x6?
Saludos,
Antonio
On 30 Jun 2004, at 22:06, Albano Garcia wrote:
Hi gang,
I'm still here, but my job (quitting soon), university
and girlfriend leaves few space for pdml.
Just wanted to let you know that my website has moved
to a new domain:
http://www.albanogarcia.c
Hi gang,
I'm still here, but my job (quitting soon), university
and girlfriend leaves few space for pdml.
Just wanted to let you know that my website has moved
to a new domain:
http://www.albanogarcia.com.ar
There are some new pics.
The design section will be ready soon.
By the way, if som
Hi gang,
I'm still here, but my job (quitting soon), university
and girlfriend leaves few space for pdml.
Just wanted to let you know that my website has moved
to a new domain:
http://www.albanogarcia.com.ar
There are some new pics.
The design section will be ready soon.
By the wa
Oh Bob, stop bitching
Norm
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Adelheid,
I hope the submission process gets better soon.
Hi Adelheid,
> I am afraid this is Jostein's part.
> The autopug is his baby.
> If you are in doubt please send the submission as mail to
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a sensible Subject.
> Otherwise it gets caught in my Spamfilter.
>
> Then I'll check whether it made it or not and submit it myself
EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Freitag, 28. Mai 2004 19:52
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Only -PUG June is available on my website
Adelheid,
I hope the submission process gets better soon.
This is the 2nd or third month that I have worked to prepare and submit
something only to find nothing in
Does this mean it went thru and then errored or that it didn't go thru at
all? (most likely) I just couldn't tell and without a confirmation, I didn't know.
Regards, Bob S.
Adelheid writes:
> Hi folks,
>
> The June PUG is ready on my website.
>
> This means:
&
Clear your cache.
Or try to reload.
It works fine on my end.
Cheers
Adelheid
-Original Message-
From: Bob Blakely [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Freitag, 28. Mai 2004 17:36
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: ONLY -PUG June is available on my website
I see everything *except* the
Adelheid:
>
> Thank you so much.
>
> ERN
>
> Adelheid told us:
> > The June PUG is ready on my website. (... snip ...)
>
> > So now the issue of the URL
> > It will change each month at present it is:
> > http://www.kirschten.de/PUG/04jun
Adelheid:
Thank you so much.
ERN
Adelheid told us:
> The June PUG is ready on my website. (... snip ...)
> So now the issue of the URL
> It will change each month at present it is:
> http://www.kirschten.de/PUG/04jun
(snip)
Hi folks,
The June PUG is ready on my website.
This means:
Some links on this page are NOT!!! working.
But you have at least a link to Josteins page and you can look at the
pictures of June.
I don't have much space on my site, so only the current month and last month
is available! No arc
Thanks, Gianfranco,
I've been working on my street photography...
cheers,
frank
"The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The pessimist
fears it is true." -J. Robert Oppenheimer
From: Gianfranco Irlanda <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Yours is, in fact, a great shot (that's stre
frank theriault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Thanks Adelheid, Jostein, and anyone else who was involved
that I don't know
> about.
>
> Another wonderful gallery. Initial gut reaction:
Gianfranco's piccie
> rocks!!
First, I add my thanks (again!) to Adelheid and Jostein for
their effort.
Second... Fr
Cheers to the Pugmeister!
Many Thanks to Adelheid for using his own server until Komkon comes
back up!
IL Bill
On Wednesday, March 31, 2004, at 11:47 AM, Adelheid v. K. wrote:
Hi folks,
since der komkon server seems to be down again I decided to put at
least the
April PUG on my own website.
T
And a very nice PUG it is this month as well. Thanks Adelheid and all
the others who worked on getting this for us.
The webpages and photographs load quite quickly for me.
On Wed, 2004-03-31 at 19:47, Adelheid v. K. wrote:
> Hi folks,
>
> since der komkon server seems to be down again I decided t
Hi folks,
since der komkon server seems to be down again I decided to put at least the
April PUG on my own website.
This means:
Some links on this page are NOT!!! working.
But you have at least a link to Josteins page and you can look at the
pictures of April.
I don't have much space on my site
Peter said, regarding Adelheid's PUG arrangements:
> As this is above and beyond the call of duty how could we complain.
As a matter of fact, I'm sure we all are VERY appreciative of Adelheid's hard
work.
ERN
That is why I am hesitant to report this Adelheid: hen I click on my
submission, I see there are three photographs on the page. The second
and third are not mine.
But thanks for doing this, the photo's load very fast.
On Mon, 2004-03-15 at 22:38, Peter J. Alling wrote:
> As this is above and beyo
Hi folks,
since der komkon server seems to be down again I decided to put at least the
March PUG on my own website.
This means:
Some links on this page are NOT!!! working.
But you have at least a link to Josteins page and you can look at the
pictures of March.
Since I changed some typos directl
On 27/1/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
>> But when it is on a mailing list sponsered by Pentax, there are
>liability issues
>> involved. On a public list, as the PDML is now, they don't have to
>worry about it.
>>
>> "Our Johnny read, on the Official Pentax Mailing list, how to modify
>his strob
graywolf wrote:
> Yes they do.
>
> But when it is on a mailing list sponsered by Pentax, there
> are liability issues involved. On a public list, as the PDML
> is now, they don't have to worry about it.
>
> "Our Johnny read, on the Official Pentax Mailing list, how to
> modify his strobe, st
I can do $20 USD
On 26/1/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
>Wouldn't you agree that there is a certain amount of irony in the fact that
>many companies spend a fortune to learn what Pentax had here. Unless, in the
>background they are still there of course
>
>Malcolm - available for sponsorship
Oh, they are st
On 25/1/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
>AFAIK, they didn't give any. However, my "unofficial" sources tell me it as
>liability issues. You guys made suggestions (like modifining flashes,
>Cotty )
>to users that scared Pentax's lawyers .
LOL. If they saw the K50 1.2 on an EOS body, they'd be j
AFAIK, they didn't give any. However, my "unofficial" sources tell me it as
liability issues. You guys made suggestions (like modifining flashes, Cotty )
to users that scared Pentax's lawyers .
--
Lon Williamson wrote:
I only know what Doug put on the PDML home page.
Look around a bit there.
I'
Mind emailing me that, Malcom?
Malcolm Smith wrote:
Lon Williamson wrote:
I only know what Doug put on the PDML home page.
Look around a bit there.
I've only known PDML in the capable hands of Doug Brewer. What were
the reasons Pentax gave for discontinuing the list?
Within moments I was e-
Lon Williamson wrote:
> I only know what Doug put on the PDML home page.
> Look around a bit there.
>
> >
> > I've only known PDML in the capable hands of Doug Brewer. What were
> > the reasons Pentax gave for discontinuing the list?
Within moments I was e-mailed the definitive posting off l
Hi!
For my part, I strongly oppose that the PUG should be a host for
personal
galleries. There are already loads of places offering that service
for free,
and I don't see why the PDML should take on the effort of providing
yet
another.
I think I agree with you, Jostein. PUG is unique and I t
I don't think the "user interface" should change one iota.
If it ain't broke, don't fix it, my Daddy always told me.
-Lon
Jostein wrote, in part:
For my part, I strongly oppose that the PUG should be a host for personal
galleries. There are already loads of places offering that service for free,
I only know what Doug put on the PDML home page.
Look around a bit there.
I've only known PDML in the capable hands of Doug Brewer. What were the
reasons Pentax gave for discontinuing the list?
Malcolm
Folks,
We have already got many offers for monetary contribution, and one offer to
take over the hosting. You just have to admire the commitment of people on
this list!
But Alin raises two separate issues in his mail. One is to move the gallery
to another server, the other is to change the soluti
Lon Williamson wrote:
> Yeah, hats off to Adelheid and Jostein.
Certainly!!
> Pentax USA used to host this list. I understand why they
> dropped it.
I've only known PDML in the capable hands of Doug Brewer. What were the
reasons Pentax gave for discontinuing the list?
Malcolm
Yeah, hats off to Adelheid and Jostein.
Pentax USA used to host this list. I understand
why they dropped it. I'm wondering, however, if
they might be willing to host the PUG as long as
no reference to this list exists. Is that worth
pursuing?
frank theriault wrote:
Well, first of all, Adelheid:
> Perhaps we could offer komkon a yearly contribution to partly
> repay their generosity and bandwidth.
Excellent idea !!!
Fred
with them via
> credit cards, Paypal etc.
>
> John Coyle
> Brisbane, Australia
> - Original Message -
> From: "Alin Flaider" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "Adelheid v. K." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Saturday, January 24, 2004 10:17 PM
>
bane, Australia
- Original Message -
From: "Alin Flaider" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Adelheid v. K." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, January 24, 2004 10:17 PM
Subject: Re: ONLY - PUG January is on my website
> Adelheid wrote:
>
> AvK> I will wo
- Original Message -
From: "Adelheid v. K." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, January 24, 2004 03:57 PM
Subject: RE: ONLY - PUG January is on my website
> If I understand this correctly you are willing to be the next PUGmeister?
I am willing to contribute as well.
On Jan 24, 2004, at 2:32 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Hi!
AF> To play it safe we should cover the expenses for the next two
years
AF> so this makes 280$. I am willing to contribute with up to $40.
I think I can contribute the similar figure. So count me in
bject: Re: ONLY - PUG January is on my website
I do, however, reserve the right to ask (*not* require/demand) donations to
help offset the cost of maintaining the site. :-)
- Original Message -
From: "Chris Hamilton" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Sa
y, January 24, 2004 12:22 PM
Subject: Re: PUG.ORG (was:Re: ONLY - PUG January is on my website)
> > Perhaps www.smugmug.com should be given consideration as a home
> > for pug. There are several advantages.
>
> Hey - "pug.smugmug.com". Kinda rolls off the tongue, eh?
>
> Fred
>
>
>
Re: ONLY - PUG January is on my website
> I can host the site (on a more permanent basis).
>
> I have ~50GB of disk space and 700GB per month with my current hosting
plan.
>
> I could even throw up a web-based forum-type dealie if y'all wanted to
> consider a non-email approach to PDML going forward.
I think the first thing we need to do is decide if we
need to do anything :-)
Then, if we *do* decide to move away from komkon, do we
want to just use one of the photo-hosting sites such as
smugmug (which looks good at first inspection), or do we
want something with a little more configurability?
I can host the site (on a more permanent basis).
I have ~50GB of disk space and 700GB per month with my current hosting plan.
I could even throw up a web-based forum-type dealie if y'all wanted to
consider a non-email approach to PDML going forward.
-Chris
> (is Igor still around?)
The only email address I have for Igor (which I've used for PLG
purposes) is a komkon.org address...
Fred
> Perhaps www.smugmug.com should be given consideration as a home
> for pug. There are several advantages.
Hey - "pug.smugmug.com". Kinda rolls off the tongue, eh?
Fred
On the topic of a home for PUG
Perhaps www.smugmug.com should be given consideration as a home for
pug. There are several advantages.
Storage is unlimited at all subscription levels.
Bandwidth allowances are as follows:
2 gigabytes per month at the standard $29.95 per year level.
4 gigabytes
I'd be willing to kick in towards the total cost as well. 2 gigs of
bandwidth sounds a bit low to me, though - hopefully someone at Komkon (is
Igor still around?) can help get some stats on past usage.
- MCC
At 07:25 PM 1/24/2004 +0200, you wrote:
Bob S. wrote:
Rac> Alin or anyone,
Rac> What
> Hi!
>
> AF> To play it safe we should cover the expenses for the next two years
> AF> so this makes 280$. I am willing to contribute with up to $40.
>
> I think I can contribute the similar figure. So count me in.
>
> As for the currency: well - indeed, I can send funds only by means of
>
> Hi folks,
>
> since der komkon server seems to be down for the unforseeable future I
> decided to put at least the January PUG on my own website.
Thank you,
Adelheid.
On 24/1/04, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
>and who would be willing to contribute?
In 1998 I contributed to a new home for the Dome Home list web presence.
I would certainly contribute here. I think back then it was 10 bucks per,
and I think I gave 20 or 30 if memory serves. US dollars is the worl
Hi!
AF> To play it safe we should cover the expenses for the next two years
AF> so this makes 280$. I am willing to contribute with up to $40.
I think I can contribute the similar figure. So count me in.
As for the currency: well - indeed, I can send funds only by means of
PayPal. I hope it
" -J. Robert Oppenheimer
From: "Adelheid v. K." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: ONLY - PUG January is on my website Date: Sat, 24 Jan 2004
12:19:28 +0100
Hi folks,
since der komkon server seems to be down for the un
Bob S. wrote:
Rac> Alin or anyone,
Rac> What would the annual cost of something like this be?
For 800 MB storage and 2 GB bandwidth I expect 10$/month. [2
GB/month is a rough figure but I really don't think current PUG
traffic is anywhere close to that; somebody in the PUG team with
acce
Where my website is hosted -- http://detailhosting.com/ -- it costs me $5.95 a
month, but the PUG may need more bandwidth and space than I have (5gig, 250mb),
so it may cost a bit more than that. In any case web hosting is not as expensive
as it used to be.
--
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Alin
1 - 100 of 142 matches
Mail list logo
