Re: Takumer (Bayonet) 135 f2.5

2003-07-16 Thread Fred
> Isn't it that the 52mm front thread lens (Tak Bayo) is also a the > shorter lens, making the light path less long? Not so much light > bending to go on, and the same effective aperture can be > physically less wide, in a shorter lens assembly. So I have > gathered from what I've seen over the yea

Re: Takumer (Bayonet) 135 f2.5

2003-07-16 Thread Keith Whaley
Isn't it that the 52mm front thread lens (Tak Bayo) is also a the shorter lens, making the light path less long? Not so much light bending to go on, and the same effective aperture can be physically less wide, in a shorter lens assembly. So I have gathered from what I've seen over the years... A l

Re: Takumer (Bayonet) 135 f2.5

2003-07-16 Thread Fred
> Difference between f2.5 and f3.5 is significant - you will > appreciate it in low light levels! ...except that the Takumar Bayonet 135/"2.5", with its not overly generous 52mm filter threads (unlike the K 135/2.5, which has 58mm threads) would seem unlikely to be much faster than f/2.8. In any

Re: Takumer (Bayonet) 135 f2.5

2003-07-15 Thread Scott D
I got the M 3.5 a few months ago off ebay, for about $40 IIRC. I've been pretty happy with it. Christian Skofteland wrote: I bought my Takumar (Bayonet) 135/2.5 for US$20.00 in "almost-never-used-because-it-was-so-clean-and-perfect" condition. Sounds like a budget lens to me.,,, (the M is proba

Re: Takumer (Bayonet) 135 f2.5

2003-07-15 Thread Fred
> It performs very good wide open with quite nice contrast and > sharpness. OK, maybe not as super-sharp as SMC-K 135/2.5 but still > decent performer for its price - definitely better than many of > today's zooms! It's a decent lens, and may be considered to be sort of a "lighthearted" companion

Re: Takumer (Bayonet) 135 f2.5

2003-07-15 Thread Christian
Some details here: http://www.bdimitrov.de/kmp/lenses/primes/_non-SMC/tak_135f2.5.html It lacks SMC. I think it falls into more of the "M" series due to its size. clearly nothing to do with SMCP-M lenses however. I think mine is a great indoor portrait lens. Christian - Original Message

Re: Takumer (Bayonet) 135 f2.5

2003-07-15 Thread Sylwester Pietrzyk
on 15.07.03 20:01, Steve Desjardins at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > I have one of the aforementioned and oft besmirched lenses. I assume > that this was some kind of consumer grade product. It clearly does not > fit into the K, M, A, F, or FA category. Anyone know the details. I > can't find it