John Sessoms wrote:
> From:
> Adam Maas
>> Not just that, but he's the worst sort of Authoritarian Nanny-Stater.
>> A complete 'if it isn't specifically permitted it must be denied type'.
> I believe the standard is ... "Anything not compulsory is forbidden!"
>
>> I hope to hell he doesn't run fo
From:
Adam Maas
> Not just that, but he's the worst sort of Authoritarian Nanny-Stater.
> A complete 'if it isn't specifically permitted it must be denied type'.
I believe the standard is ... "Anything not compulsory is forbidden!"
> I hope to hell he doesn't run for President. I'd rather have Na
From: Wilko Bulte
> Well, if you watch the tele and see the British paparazzi haunt the
> rich and famous there is a certain point to protecting people's right to
> privacy.
Think I'm gonna' have to take sides with Mercutio on that one - "A
plague o' both your houses!"
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss M
From:
"Digital Image Studio"
> City May Seek Permit and Insurance for Many Kinds of Public Photography
>
> http://www.nytimes.com/2007/06/29/nyregion/29camera.html?ei=5090&en=71135caff6fefe6a&ex=1340769600&partner=rssuserland&emc=rss&pagewanted=print
>
>
>
> "New rules being considered by the May
I have my own bone to pick with the guy, since parts of my corner of
Queens had a blackout for a week last year, and not only did he do
nothing about it, he never held the electric company accountable. If
that's the way he acts in a crisis, imagine what he'd do with
something like another Hurricane
On Jun 29, 2007, at 11:18 PM, Digital Image Studio wrote:
> On 30/06/07, Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> When they arrest me for doing my flavor of street photography, I'll
>> let you know how the case goes in court.
>
> How many of you are there?
Well, the other day there were si
On 30/06/07, Godfrey DiGiorgi <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> When they arrest me for doing my flavor of street photography, I'll
> let you know how the case goes in court.
How many of you are there?
--
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110 UTC(GMT) +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http:
On Jun 30, 2007, at 3:20 AM, ann sanfedele wrote:
> Actually, that isn't as scary as it sounds...
> It's aimed at film and TV crews mainly - not a single person with a
> camera hand held,
> and, I"m sure not news folk...
I never trust the intent of a law. That's just the sales pitch.
What mat
When they arrest me for doing my flavor of street photography, I'll
let you know how the case goes in court.
G
On Jun 29, 2007, at 6:21 AM, Digital Image Studio wrote:
> City May Seek Permit and Insurance for Many Kinds of Public
> Photography
>
> http://www.nytimes.com/2007/06/29/nyregion/
> What part of the city do you live in???
Graywolf lives in a very southern part of the city.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: "Norm Baugher" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Permits may soon be required to shoot in NYC
> What part of the city do
What part of the city do you live in???
Norm
graywolf wrote:
> Hey man, that is NYC, folks strip cars on the street and the cops walk right
> by them.
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
- Original Message -
From: "frank theriault"
Subject: Re: Permits may soon be required to shoot in NYC
> On 6/29/07, Adam Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>> Likely that will be the case most often. But I expect rentacops to use
>> this propo
Hey man, that is NYC, folks strip cars on the street and the cops walk right by
them. NYC has lots of laws, only a few of them seem to get enforced. If fact, I
am pretty sure that NYC already has a law requiring a permit for any
photo/film/video operation that obstructs traffic, vehicle or pedes
frank theriault wrote:
> On 6/29/07, Adam Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>
>> Likely that will be the case most often. But I expect rentacops to use this
>> proposed law on a regular basis to try and prevent people from shooting
>> buildings legally.
>
> That law won't give renta cops any m
William Robb wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: "Adam Maas"
> Subject: Re: Permits may soon be required to shoot in NYC
>
>
>
>
>>>I blame the French.
>
>
>>On this point you may be correct. France is at the forefront of
Well, if that were the case, they'd be arresting hundreds of people
every day outside my office. We did have a jumper a couple months ago,
the press were there and all I heard the cops tell them was to check
with the commanding officer before they could cross the tape...
Norm
frank theriault wr
On 6/29/07, Adam Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Likely that will be the case most often. But I expect rentacops to use this
> proposed law on a regular basis to try and prevent people from shooting
> buildings legally.
>
They already try to do it illegally. Give them a law allowing it and
yo
On 6/29/07, Adam Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Likely that will be the case most often. But I expect rentacops to use this
> proposed law on a regular basis to try and prevent people from shooting
> buildings legally.
That law won't give renta cops any more power than they have now -
which
On 6/29/07, Adam Maas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Wilko Bulte wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 29, 2007 at 10:57:14AM -0400, Adam Maas wrote..
I was watching something about that on, I believe, Slice the other
day. Elliot Erwitt was one of the interviewees.
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail Lis
frank theriault wrote:
> On 6/29/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> This suggested legislation is in response to pros shooting ads and editorial
>> without permits. It happens a lot in New York and sometimes causes problems
>> with traffic and/or crowds. I doubt that a wandering
On 6/29/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This suggested legislation is in response to pros shooting ads and editorial
> without permits. It happens a lot in New York and sometimes causes problems
> with traffic and/or crowds. I doubt that a wandering group of PDMLers would
> ex
On Fri, Jun 29, 2007 at 12:49:24PM -0400, John Francis wrote..
> On Fri, Jun 29, 2007 at 05:51:49PM +0200, Wilko Bulte wrote:
> >
> > Well, if you watch the tele and see the British paparazzi haunt the
> > rich and famous there is a certain point to protecting people's right to
> > privacy.
>
>
On 6/29/07, Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 29/6/07, Adam Maas, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
> >On this point you may be correct. France is at the forefront of
> >ridiculous restrictions on photographers, having essentially made Street
> >Photography illegal.
As far as I'm aware (and please
On 29/6/07, Adam Maas, discombobulated, unleashed:
>On this point you may be correct. France is at the forefront of
>ridiculous restrictions on photographers, having essentially made Street
>Photography illegal.
Loada bollocks.
I go to France. I shoot pics in the street. I don't get arrested. Th
On Fri, Jun 29, 2007 at 08:43:58AM -0600, William Robb wrote:
>
> The problem with legislators is that they have to legislate things in order
> to justify themselves. The big stuff has been taken care of for decades, so
> now all that is left is parsing minutae.
Indeed. An example, here in Cal
On Fri, Jun 29, 2007 at 05:51:49PM +0200, Wilko Bulte wrote:
>
> Well, if you watch the tele and see the British paparazzi haunt the
> rich and famous there is a certain point to protecting people's right to
> privacy.
Why just pick on the British paparazzi? Have you seen the scrum around,
say,
;>> - Original Message -
>>> From: "David Savage"
>>> Subject: Re: Permits may soon be required to shoot in NYC
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> The sky isn't falling, the earth is rising.
>>>>
>>>
Wilko Bulte wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 29, 2007 at 10:57:14AM -0400, Adam Maas wrote..
>> William Robb wrote:
>>> - Original Message -
>>> From: "David Savage"
>>> Subject: Re: Permits may soon be required to shoot in NYC
>>>
>>>
On 6/29/07, William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "P. J. Alling"
> Subject: Re: Permits may soon be required to shoot in NYC
>
>
> > Just don't take photographs of any person without their permission in
&g
. Even
if there is no legal requirement to do so I would call it impolite to
take their picture without asking first.
Wilko
> Wilko Bulte wrote:
> > On Fri, Jun 29, 2007 at 07:50:43AM -0600, William Robb wrote..
> >
> >> - Original Message -----
> >> Fro
On Fri, Jun 29, 2007 at 09:24:54AM -0600, William Robb wrote..
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Adam Maas"
> Subject: Re: Permits may soon be required to shoot in NYC
>
>
>
> >>
> >> I blame the French.
>
> >
> >
On Fri, Jun 29, 2007 at 10:57:14AM -0400, Adam Maas wrote..
> William Robb wrote:
> > - Original Message -
> > From: "David Savage"
> > Subject: Re: Permits may soon be required to shoot in NYC
> >
> >
> >
> >> The sky is
- Original Message -
From: "Adam Maas"
Subject: Re: Permits may soon be required to shoot in NYC
>>
>> I blame the French.
>
> On this point you may be correct. France is at the forefront of ridiculous
> restrictions on photographers, having esse
On 6/29/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This suggested legislation is in response to pros shooting ads and editorial
> without permits. It happens a lot in New York and sometimes causes problems
> with traffic and/or crowds. I doubt that a wandering group of PDMLers would
> ex
- Original Message -
From: "P. J. Alling"
Subject: Re: Permits may soon be required to shoot in NYC
> Just don't take photographs of any person without their permission in
> France...
Or buildings that are lit by artificial light, or have been built within the
la
Digital Image Studio wrote:
>City May Seek Permit and Insurance for Many Kinds of Public Photography
>
>http://www.nytimes.com/2007/06/29/nyregion/29camera.html?ei=5090&en=71135caff6fefe6a&ex=1340769600&partner=rssuserland&emc=rss&pagewanted=print
>
>"New rules being considered by the Mayor's Offi
Just don't take photographs of any person without their permission in
France...
Wilko Bulte wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 29, 2007 at 07:50:43AM -0600, William Robb wrote..
>
>> - Original Message -
>> From:
>> Subject: Re: Permits may soon be required to shoot
Not just that, but he's the worst sort of Authoritarian Nanny-Stater. A
complete 'if it isn't specifically permitted it must be denied type'.
I hope to hell he doesn't run for President. I'd rather have Nader or Trent
Lott in power down there (and I despise both of those individuals).
-Adam
P.
William Robb wrote:
> - Original Message -
> From: "David Savage"
> Subject: Re: Permits may soon be required to shoot in NYC
>
>
>
>> The sky isn't falling, the earth is rising.
>>
>> I blame global warming.
>>
>
>
- Original Message -
From: "Wilko Bulte"
Subject: Re: Permits may soon be required to shoot in NYC
> You can still seek asylum in Europe. I've been shooting, tripod and all,
> lots of public buildings in Berlin, even inside the main trainstation,
> federal bui
Did anyone mention that Mayor Bloomberg is, (if you'll pardon the
expression), an a**h***.
Digital Image Studio wrote:
> City May Seek Permit and Insurance for Many Kinds of Public Photography
>
> http://www.nytimes.com/2007/06/29/nyregion/29camera.html?ei=5090&en=71135caff6fefe6a&ex=1340769600&p
- Original Message -
From: "David Savage"
Subject: Re: Permits may soon be required to shoot in NYC
>
> The sky isn't falling, the earth is rising.
>
> I blame global warming.
>
I blame the French.
WW
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pd
On Fri, Jun 29, 2007 at 07:50:43AM -0600, William Robb wrote..
>
> - Original Message -
> From:
> Subject: Re: Permits may soon be required to shoot in NYC
>
>
> > This suggested legislation is in response to pros shooting ads and
> > editorial without pe
On 6/29/07, Digital Image Studio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 29/06/07, William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > This is another example of the creeping horseshit that is permeating
> > society, and another small freedom falling unnoticed by the wayside.
> > Soon, we won't have any small fr
- Original Message -
From: "Digital Image Studio"
Subject: Re: Permits may soon be required to shoot in NYC
> So the sky is or isn't falling? ;-)
In some parts of North America, it is definitely getting closer to the
ground...
William Robb
--
PDML Pentax
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>This suggested legislation is in response to pros shooting ads and
>editorial without permits. It happens a lot in New York and sometimes
>causes problems with traffic and/or crowds. I doubt that a wandering
>group of PDMLers would experience any problems.
Perhaps not.
On 29/06/07, William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> This is another example of the creeping horseshit that is permeating
> society, and another small freedom falling unnoticed by the wayside.
> Soon, we won't have any small freedoms left.
So the sky is or isn't falling? ;-)
--
Rob Studdert
H
- Original Message -
From:
Subject: Re: Permits may soon be required to shoot in NYC
> This suggested legislation is in response to pros shooting ads and
> editorial without permits. It happens a lot in New York and sometimes
> causes problems with traffic and/or crowds. I d
This suggested legislation is in response to pros shooting ads and editorial
without permits. It happens a lot in New York and sometimes causes problems
with traffic and/or crowds. I doubt that a wandering group of PDMLers would
experience any problems.
Paul
-- Original message
49 matches
Mail list logo
