Re: Pug comments Part Deux

Thanks for the nice comment, Dave. Actually, what nailed the exposure was center-weighted average metering. I goofed when I submitted it to PUG. The film was E100VS -- hence the dark shadows. One of my favorites from that trip Joe

Re: Pug comments Part Deux

> Dave, > Thanks for the comment. Enjoyed your pug critiques. > Maybe I'll have to visit Mount Robsin in B.C. > sometime. > Haven't been there yet. > Btw Paradise Meadows at Mount Rainier are naturally > that way without many big trees, because of the high

Re: Pug comments Part Deux

Dave, Thanks for the comment. Enjoyed your pug critiques. Maybe I'll have to visit Mount Robsin in B.C. sometime. Haven't been there yet. Btw Paradise Meadows at Mount Rainier are naturally that way without many big trees, because of the high elevation. It's a nature park, and no clear cutting up

Re: PUG Comments Part Deux

Thanks for your kind comments, Frank. I tried shots with the cars moving, but was not happy with the result. In the one I chose, the cars are stopped, but it still gives the feeling of being stuck in traffic, which is what I was after. Dan Matyola frank theriault wrote: > "Rainy Road" by Dan M

Re: PUG Comments Part Deux

Hi Frank, Thanks for the kind words and commenting on the whole lot! Steve Larson Redondo Beach, California frank theriault wrote: > "Calla", by Steve Larson: > > Wasn't there some discussion here a while back about this lens? Wow! > This reminds me of those famous "pepper" photos by Weston.