On Wed, 29 Jun 2005 15:52:36 US/Eastern, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> I like the rework better Frank.
So do I.
> Adjusting that minor tilt work with me.
It's more the crop for me, but yeah, I have to grudgingly admit - it's
better w/o the tilt...
> Love the grainy, crappy fa
I like the rework better Frank.
Adjusting that minor tilt work with me.
Love the grainy, crappy fall day, feel to it.
Dave
> One of the reasons I always try to
"crop in the
viewfinder" is that
> I'm so horrible at doing it after the fact. Here's Jerome'
Hi!
One of the reasons I always try to "crop in the viewfinder" is that
I'm so horrible at doing it after the fact. Here's Jerome's "untilt
and re-crop", which I think works much better than my original post of
the photo:
http://www.exposedfilm.net/frank/frank.htm
Any thoughts?
Frank, I thi
I must say this does bring out the potential.
frank theriault wrote:
One of the reasons I always try to "crop in the viewfinder" is that
I'm so horrible at doing it after the fact. Here's Jerome's "untilt
and re-crop", which I think works much better than my original post of
the photo:
http:/
I prefer this version. I would probably like the shot a lot more in a
very large format. Wide shots with lots of small detail don't translate
well to small web images IMO.
Paul
On Jun 27, 2005, at 9:56 PM, frank theriault wrote:
One of the reasons I always try to "crop in the viewfinder" is th
5 matches
Mail list logo
