On Fri, 24 Jun 2005 21:08:22 +1200, David Mann wrote:
> Already got one.
"I told him we already got one. [snicker]"
TTYL, DougF KG4LMZ
On Jun 24, 2005, at 1:21 AM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
You can us XP or Win2000 (Maybe even ME ... not 100% sure about
that). If
you're running into memory problems with CS, try reducing the
amount of
memory allocated to the program.
Thanks for the tip... it's currently set to 90% of availabl
I have heard that the windows versions of PS (up through CS at least) are not
designed to use more than 1gb. I understand the MAC versions do not have that
limitation.
graywolf
http://www.graywolfphoto.com
"Idiot Proof" <==> "Expert Proof"
---
David Mann wrote:
--
mike wilson wrote:
From: "Herb Chong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 2005/06/22 Wed PM 11:11:48 GMT
To:
Subject: Re: Re: Enablement One-Scan Dual IV
WinMe is not a goof choice if you need to go above 1G of RAM. too many
device driver problems.
Herb...
Thanks. Win2000 has
You can us XP or Win2000 (Maybe even ME ... not 100% sure about that). If
you're running into memory problems with CS, try reducing the amount of
memory allocated to the program. I know that seems counter-intuitive, but
you've got to save some memory for the OS and any other programs that are
run
>
> From: Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2005/06/23 Thu PM 12:29:23 GMT
> To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> Subject: Re: Enablement One-Scan Dual IV
>
> mike wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >> From: "Herb Chong" <[EMAIL PRO
mike wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> From: "Herb Chong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
>>
>> WinMe is not a goof choice if you need to go above 1G of RAM. too many
>> device driver problems.
>
>Thanks. Win2000 has been a possibility for some time but I'm so
>happy with what I've got I've never fel
>
> From: David Mann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2005/06/23 Thu AM 09:18:46 GMT
> To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> Subject: Re: Enablement One-Scan Dual IV
>
> On Jun 22, 2005, at 9:32 PM, mike wilson wrote:
>
> > Thanks for the info. I've got 1Gb alrea
On Jun 22, 2005, at 9:32 PM, mike wilson wrote:
Thanks for the info. I've got 1Gb already, in a system running
WinME. Any other tips/foibles?
If you plan to install Photoshop CS you'll need Windows XP. Or a
certain other platform which I shall not mention ;) I don't really
find proces
On Jun 23, 2005, at 2:15 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
Ah, never mind. I found it. Looks good! :-)
For the benefit of others, the website is http://www.scanhancer.com/
The difference this thing made for me was astounding. The "pepper-
grain" effect of some films completely vanishes along with
>
> From: "Herb Chong" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2005/06/22 Wed PM 11:11:48 GMT
> To:
> Subject: Re: Re: Enablement One-Scan Dual IV
>
> WinMe is not a goof choice if you need to go above 1G of RAM. too many
> device driver problems.
>
> Herb..
On Wed, 22 Jun 2005 19:11:48 -0400, Herb Chong wrote:
> WinMe is not a goof choice if you need to go above 1G of RAM. too many
> device driver problems.
Actually, it _is_ a _goof_ choice ... it's _not_ a _good_ choice. :-)
TTYL, DougF KG4LMZ
only in this case.
Herb...
- Original Message -
From: "Bob Blakely" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2005 7:19 PM
Subject: Re: Re: Enablement One-Scan Dual IV
I claim that WinMe IS a goof choic
I claim that WinMe IS a goof choice.
Regards,
Bob...
-
"The art of taxation consists in so plucking the goose
as to obtain the largest possible amount of feathers
with the smallest possible amount of hissing."
- Jean-Baptiste Colbert
WinMe is not a goof choice if you need to go above 1G of RAM. too many
device driver problems.
Herb...
- Original Message -
From: "mike wilson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, June 22, 2005 5:32 AM
Subject: Re: Re: Enablement One-Scan Dual IV
Thanks for the
A test winner at many places I suppose. Nice image, but definition etc is
difficult to judge from a relatily small image. Please show moe scans -
colour too :-)
Regards
Jens
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://hjem.get2net.dk/bladt
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
Fra: Don Sanderson [mailto:[EMAIL P
>
> From: mike wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2005/06/22 Wed PM 02:34:12 GMT
> To:
> Subject: Re: Re: Enablement One-Scan Dual IV
>
>
> >
> > From: Henri Toivonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Date: 2005/06/22 Wed PM 02:13:55 GMT
> > To
>
> From: Henri Toivonen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2005/06/22 Wed PM 02:13:55 GMT
> To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> Subject: Re: Enablement One-Scan Dual IV
>
> mike wilson wrote:
>
> >>From: David Mann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> >>Date:
On Jun 22, 2005, at 7:17 AM, Cotty wrote:
What's a Scanhancer?
For heaven's sake Godders, have you never hanced a scan???
Uh...
I'm a serial hancer. We have our own category in Weird and
Wonderful on
eBay.!
Should I be afraid now? ]'-)
Godfrey
On 22/6/05, Godfrey DiGiorgi, discombobulated, unleashed:
>What's a Scanhancer?
For heaven's sake Godders, have you never hanced a scan???
I'm a serial hancer. We have our own category in Weird and Wonderful on
eBay.!
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||
On Jun 22, 2005, at 7:13 AM, Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
I have the Multi Pro which goes up to 6x9cm.
If you ever think of buying one of these, budget for at least a
couple of Gb of RAM. And a Scanhancer (costs all of €30).
What's a Scanhancer?
Ah, never mind. I found it. Looks good! :-)
mike wilson wrote:
From: David Mann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: 2005/06/22 Wed AM 09:05:10 GMT
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: Enablement One-Scan Dual IV
On Jun 22, 2005, at 6:27 PM, mike wilson wrote:
Unless you have MF to deal with, in which case the Multi is the way
Unless you have MF to deal with, in which case the Multi is the
way to go.
Of course. :-)
I have the Multi Pro which goes up to 6x9cm.
If you ever think of buying one of these, budget for at least a
couple of Gb of RAM. And a Scanhancer (costs all of €30).
What's a Scanhancer?
Godfre
>
> From: David Mann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2005/06/22 Wed AM 09:05:10 GMT
> To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> Subject: Re: Enablement One-Scan Dual IV
>
> On Jun 22, 2005, at 6:27 PM, mike wilson wrote:
>
> > Unless you have MF to deal with, in which c
On Jun 22, 2005, at 6:27 PM, mike wilson wrote:
Unless you have MF to deal with, in which case the Multi is the way
to go.
I have the Multi Pro which goes up to 6x9cm.
If you ever think of buying one of these, budget for at least a
couple of Gb of RAM. And a Scanhancer (costs all of €30).
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
The only reason that I can think of to go for a higher priced scanner
is to get the dust and scratch removal features. If you're shooting
primarily traditional B&W film, that doesn't work anyway so the Scan
Dual IV is all you need.
Godfrey
Unless you have MF to de
The only reason that I can think of to go for a higher priced scanner
is to get the dust and scratch removal features. If you're shooting
primarily traditional B&W film, that doesn't work anyway so the Scan
Dual IV is all you need.
Godfrey
On Jun 21, 2005, at 4:39 PM, Tom C wrote:
I've ha
t; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
To:
Subject: RE: Enablement One-Scan Dual IV
Date: Tue, 21 Jun 2005 18:19:11 -0500
Thanks, you were one of the ones that recommended the Minolta.
Don
> -Original Message-
> From: Godfrey DiGiorgi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
Don Sanderson wrote:
Finally replaced the Prime Film 1800 (POS) Scanner.
Here's a scan of a frame of Kodak BW Pro (C41 B&W):
http://www.donsauction.com/pdml/Water.htm
Scanned as B&W Neg with no correction for the color mask.
Levels adjusted in PS-CS, no sharpening.
Original scan is 4384x2892, 1
Price, availability and PDML recommendations, of course. ;-0
Don
> -Original Message-
> From: Tim Sherburne [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2005 6:12 PM
> To: Pentax Discussion List
> Subject: Re: Enablement One-Scan Dual IV
>
>
>
> Cool,
Thanks, you were one of the ones that recommended the Minolta.
Don
> -Original Message-
> From: Godfrey DiGiorgi [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: Tuesday, June 21, 2005 6:11 PM
> To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> Subject: Re: Enablement One-Scan Dual IV
>
>
> V
June 21, 2005 6:08 PM
> To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> Subject: RE: Enablement One-Scan Dual IV
>
>
> Don,
>
> Was this scanned at the highest rez your new scanner allows? What brand
> scanner is it?
>
> Anyway, congrats on the new scanner ;-)) The result lo
Cool, Don. I've been considering the same scanner. Just for grins, why did
you choose the Minolta over Nikon's offerings?
Tim
On 6/21/05 15:34, Don Sanderson wrote:
> Finally replaced the Prime Film 1800 (POS) Scanner.
> Here's a scan of a frame of Kodak BW Pro (C41 B&W):
> http://www.donsaucti
Shel's comment made me think to suggest: Always scan at the highest
optical resolution of the scanner. Do all downsizing in Photoshop or
other editing software where you have explicit control of the process.
Godfrey
On Jun 21, 2005, at 4:07 PM, Shel Belinkoff wrote:
Don,
Was this scanned
Very nice, Don. I'm still using the Scan Dual II ... and it's still
returning beautiful results, albeit a little lower rez than the IV.
Godfrey
On Jun 21, 2005, at 3:34 PM, Don Sanderson wrote:
Finally replaced the Prime Film 1800 (POS) Scanner.
Here's a scan of a frame of Kodak BW Pro (C41
Don,
Was this scanned at the highest rez your new scanner allows? What brand
scanner is it?
Anyway, congrats on the new scanner ;-)) The result looks pretty good
here, even when wearing my glasses.
Shel
> [Original Message]
> From: Don Sanderson
> http://www.donsauction.com/pdml/Water.htm
36 matches
Mail list logo
