I'd go for the implants now.
Then you'll have something to tear out over future announcements. :-)
Jostein
2009/3/2 Miserere :
> On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 5:21 PM, .timber>>code wrote:
>> Cheers list,
>>
>> Two announcements from Pentax:
>> The already known bridge:
>> http://www.dpreview.com/news/0
On Mon, Mar 2, 2009 at 5:21 PM, .timber>>code wrote:
> Cheers list,
>
> Two announcements from Pentax:
> The already known bridge:
> http://www.dpreview.com/news/0903/09030204pentax70superzoom.asp
>
> And the 15mm/f4
> http://www.dpreview.com/news/0903/09030203pentaxx15mm.asp
>
> Regards,
> t
>
T
> I've been holding off on a new body until I found out what the next
> generation [...] would be like.
when you're a balding middle-aged straight guy you don't care what your
body's like, cause all the youngsters look damned good.
> On Mon, Mar 02, 2009 at 11:21:14PM +0100, .timber>>code wrote
On Mon, Mar 02, 2009 at 11:21:14PM +0100, .timber>>code wrote:
# Cheers list,
#
# Two announcements from Pentax:
# The already known bridge:
# http://www.dpreview.com/news/0903/09030204pentax70superzoom.asp
#
# And the 15mm/f4
# http://www.dpreview.com/news/0903/09030203pentaxx15mm.asp
I've been
On Sun, 1 Jun 2008 09:15:57 +1000, "james Bradford" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
said:
> Crkennedy stand had pentax camera's in one desk and had to ask to look
> and play. AT least Samsung made a good effort. Cr didn't do a
> very good job.
Seems like nothing's changed, then.
Cheers
Brian
++
They'd better.
I still wouldn't trust Sigma, even as an OEM contractor.
2007/3/8, Ralf R. Radermacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Thibouille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Sigma? OK I see what I have to think about quality control then.
>
> Not quite. The lenses are checked in Solms.
>
> Ralf
>
> --
Thibouille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Sigma? OK I see what I have to think about quality control then.
Not quite. The lenses are checked in Solms.
Ralf
--
Ralf R. Radermacher - DL9KCG - Köln/Cologne, Germany
private homepage: http://www.fotoralf.de
manual cameras and photo galleries - up
Sigma? OK I see what I have to think about quality control then.
2007/3/8, Ralf R. Radermacher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>:
> Thibouille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> > Leica probably know how to make those lens with quality ...
>
> They *make* none of this. The making is done by Sigma.
>
> Ralf
>
> --
Thibouille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Leica probably know how to make those lens with quality ...
They *make* none of this. The making is done by Sigma.
Ralf
--
Ralf R. Radermacher - DL9KCG - Köln/Cologne, Germany
private homepage: http://www.fotoralf.de
manual cameras and photo gallerie
I don't think it's a joke. Leica's joining the 21st century. The Leica
brand as already been on P&S cameras, this is a step up IMHO.
Thibouille wrote:
> http://www.dpreview.com/news/0703/07030704leica14-150mm.asp
>
> Leica producing that kind of lens? Huh Smells brand image depreciation to me.
Mmm weird but I agree the lens seems pretty OK.
Leica probably know how to make those lens with quality (as far as
quality can be met with such lenses) but I dunno why I have a strange
feeling when looking at lenses like that from Leica.
Compact zooms are one thing. Reflex lenses is something els
On Mar 7, 2007, at 10:49 PM, Thibouille wrote:
> http://www.dpreview.com/news/0703/07030704leica14-150mm.asp
> Leica producing that kind of lens? Huh Smells brand image
> depreciation to me.
Leica has been designing 12:1 zoom lenses for cameras bearing
Panasonic and Leica names for several y
Not to leave out the competition, here is the other company that
produces a PMA Daily. I note that one of their reporters predicts
Sony will show a DSLR with Carl Zeiss lenses.
http://www.photoreporter.com/
Bob
On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 06:26:45 -0600, William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Well, we can't sell the little guys anymore, we have to do something
> with them.
I wonder how many on this list ~really~ got that one, Bill?
Let's see, how many Canadians are there?
BTW, I find it heartwarming
Now I wish I'd said that...
Cotty wrote:
Only yours :-)
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
--
I can understand why mankind hasn't given up war.
During a war you get to drive tanks through the sid
- Original Message -
From: "Tan and Steve"
Subject: RE: PMA- no new body?!?
Calf implants?! I know how cyclists like to display their
muscles... hehe.
Well, we can't sell the little guys anymore, we have to do something
with them.
William Robb
Only yours :-)
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
3:44 PM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: PMA- no new body?!?
- Original Message -
From: "Tan and Steve"
Subject: PMA- no new body?!?
>
> Did I miss something...?
>
I think Frank mentioned he was getting implants.
WW
Given the results of the recent brain test he's having one implanted :-)
Dave S
On Mon, 14 Mar 2005 23:43:52 -0600, William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Tan and Steve"
> Subject: PMA- no new body?!?
>
> >
> > Did I miss something...?
> >
>
> I thi
- Original Message -
From: "Peter J. Alling"
Subject: Re: PMA- no new body?!?
I thought he was having them removed...
Perhaps just relocated.
William Robb
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: "Tan and Steve" Subject: PMA- no
new body?!?
Did I miss something...?
I think Frank mentioned he was getting implants.
WW
I thought he was having them removed...
--
I can understand why mankind hasn't given up war.
During a war you get to
- Original Message -
From: "Tan and Steve"
Subject: PMA- no new body?!?
Did I miss something...?
I think Frank mentioned he was getting implants.
WW
ralia
www.tanyamayer.com
Ph +61 (07) 3315 4549
Mobile +61 0437831247
-Original Message-
From: Peter J. Alling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: Tuesday, 15 March 2005 3:40 PM
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: PMA- no new body?!?
Yep, Big Big news read about it here
*http://tinyur
Yep, Big Big news read about it here
*http://tinyurl.com/5q6mw*
Tan and Steve wrote:
Did I miss something or was there no exciting announcements at PMA as the
list anticipated?
tan. :)
Tanya Mayer Photography
Brisbane, Qld, Australia
www.tanyamayer.com
Ph +61 (07) 3315 4549
Mobile +61 0437831247
Interesting that 35 mm. SLRs are 25% of unit volume, but 54% of dollar value. Perhaps
we have been too pessimistic about the future of film SLRs, and film to put in them.
It's possible that 35 mm. SLRs and 35 mm. film may be among the last to go.
Joe
"Butch Black" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Mark wrote:
>
>This is being watched with interest by everyone. Eckerd pharmacies last
>year pledged to eventually put a Fuji Frontier lab in each one of their
>stores. Eckerd has since been bought (by J.C. Penney, IIRC) and it'll be
>interesting to see if
Mark wrote:
This is being watched with interest by everyone. Eckerd pharmacies last
year pledged to eventually put a Fuji Frontier lab in each one of their
stores. Eckerd has since been bought (by J.C. Penney, IIRC) and it'll be
interesting to see if they hold to this plan. I'm betting they cut it
Interesting read, thanks for sharing Butch.
Digital is a disrupting technology. Interesting to see is the decrease of digital
camera sales between 1 and 3 MP.
I wonder how long film will be available everywhere, together with processing.
On Thursday 12 August 2004 03:46, Butch Black wrote:
FJW>
> This is just asking for a wise ass answer. But I'll leave that to someone
> else,
> (for a change).
>
> At 07:33 AM 3/5/2003 -0500, you wrote:
> >"How is this to be pronounced? "Star-ist"?"
> >
> >Since it takes K-mount lenses, I say, "Star-Kist."
Sorry,
Charlie.
This is just asking for a wise ass answer. But I'll leave that to someone
else,
(for a change).
At 07:33 AM 3/5/2003 -0500, you wrote:
>"How is this to be pronounced? "Star-ist"?"
>
>Since it takes K-mount lenses, I say, "Star-Kist."
SORRY CHARLIE !
BUTCH
Each man had only one genuine voca
This is just asking for a wise ass answer. But I'll leave that to someone
else,
(for a change).
At 07:33 AM 3/5/2003 -0500, you wrote:
"How is this to be pronounced? "Star-ist"?"
Since it takes K-mount lenses, I say, "Star-Kist."
Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend.
Inside of a d
The * is silent.
At 02:05 PM 2/18/2003 -0500, you wrote:
> They have released those FAJ lenses and the "world's smallest" SLR
> *ist. Nothing for us...
How is this to be pronounced? "Star-ist"?
Then, can I use my A* lenses on it?"A-star-ist"?
Fred
Outside of a dog, a book is man's best fr
>> They have released those FAJ lenses and the "world's smallest"
>> SLR *ist. Nothing for us...
> How is this to be pronounced? "Star-ist"?
> Then, can I use my A* lenses on it?"A-star-ist"?
Wow - talk about a slow message. When I was reading this, I didn't
even recognize at first that
> They have released those FAJ lenses and the "world's smallest" SLR
> *ist. Nothing for us...
How is this to be pronounced? "Star-ist"?
Then, can I use my A* lenses on it?"A-star-ist"?
Fred
t;Pål Jensen"
WR> Subject: Re: PMA 2003 PENTAX
>> Frits wrote:
>>
>> > Hum... first they buy the *ist, and then later the *ist D?
>>
>> Unfortunately, the usual Pentax route is to buy a Pentax entry level
WR> camera and then buy a Nikon or a Canon... :o(
- Original Message -
From: "Pål Jensen"
Subject: Re: PMA 2003 PENTAX
> Frits wrote:
>
> > Hum... first they buy the *ist, and then later the *ist D?
>
> Unfortunately, the usual Pentax route is to buy a Pentax entry level
camera and then buy a Nikon or a C
On Tue, 4 Mar 2003, Pål Jensen wrote:
> Frits wrote:
>
> > Hum... first they buy the *ist, and then later the *ist D?
>
> Unfortunately, the usual Pentax route is to buy a Pentax entry level
> camera and then buy a Nikon or a Canon... :o(
Yup... but can you blame the consumers?
chris
Frits wrote:
> Hum... first they buy the *ist, and then later the *ist D?
Unfortunately, the usual Pentax route is to buy a Pentax entry level camera and then
buy a Nikon or a Canon... :o(
Pål
On Sunday 02 March 2003 22:39, Pål Jensen wrote:
> Burt wrote:
> > List prices on Starist - $319 Out at end of March
> > BG-20 Grip - $79 Out A little after Starist.
> > Starist D - $1600- This summer.
>
> My guess is that the *ist is going to be very successful whereas the *ist D
> is going to se
Burt wrote:
> List prices on Starist - $319 Out at end of March
> BG-20 Grip - $79 Out A little after Starist.
> Starist D - $1600- This summer.
My guess is that the *ist is going to be very successful whereas the *ist D is going
to sell well to owners of K-mount lenses.
Pål
Maybe I'm being overly hopeful, but if one looks at list prices for
current cameras on Pentax USA's web site and compares them to selling
prices (at B&H for example), the street price is usually around 60% of
the list. Following that logic, we could see the *ist at about $200
and the *ist D at
Pentax has to be more aggressive in their pricing of the *ist D.
If $1600 is the list price and street is about $1300 as noted here; people
are apt to choose the 10D as the Canon system is now in its 3rd generation
(D30, D60 now 10D) where as the Pentax is first generation.
Pentax must be as agres
With a $1600 list and $1100-$1200 street price the DSLR should be OK so
long as Canon doesn't already have something in the same
price/size/weight range by then.
BR
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
List prices on Starist - $319 Out at end of March
BG-20 Grip - $79 Out A little after Starist.
Starist
On 03.3.2 4:36 PM, "[EMAIL PROTECTED]" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> List prices on Starist - $319 Out at end of March
> BG-20 Grip - $79 Out A little after Starist.
> Starist D - $1600- This summer.
> Burt
>
Japanese counterpart of price.com showed the first street price of EOS 10D
which is 173
List prices on Starist - $319 Out at end of March
BG-20 Grip - $79 Out A little after Starist.
Starist D - $1600- This summer.
So now for the million $ question, where will the street prices end up?
My guess is $250 for the *ist and $1300 for the *ist D, just as predicted.
The *ist is then a rep
"Starist D - $1600- This summer."
Ouch. I hope this is a list price. The better take
$600-$700 off! OR make it a 10-14 MP camera...
--- [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> List prices on Starist - $319 Out at end of March
> BG-20 Grip - $79 Out A little after Starist.
> Starist D - $1600- This summer.
- Original Message -
From: "Ken Archer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: PMA News: Pentax ist, new Lenses and Optio 450 and 550
> gist, jist, kist, list, mist, pist...I think I like that one ;-)
The last one actually sounds pretty much like pissed:))
Regards
Artur
Since " * " is a wildcard, the possibilities are almost endlessfist,
gist, jist, kist, list, mist, pist...I think I like that one ;-)
On Wednesday 19 February 2003 12:32 pm, John Mustarde wrote:
> I was wondering about the funny name of the new *ist camera.
>
> Now I get it - it's short for
>I was wondering about the funny name of the new *ist camera.
>
>Now I get it - it's short for Pentax Discuss Mailing *ist.
>
>So for me, the *ist camera is officially pronounced "List".
Either that or the designer was Pist.
Cotty
Oh, swipe me! He paints
I was wondering about the funny name of the new *ist camera.
Now I get it - it's short for Pentax Discuss Mailing *ist.
So for me, the *ist camera is officially pronounced "List".
--
John Mustarde
www.photolin.com
> I used to
>read the 1953 Dodge, and then 1965 Plymouth service manuals that my
>father kept under his seat in the car.
>
>BR
This explains a lot.
Cotty
PS :-)
Oh, swipe me! He paints with light!
http://www.macads.co.uk/snaps/
Pål wrote:
"They do that for all their equipment. You can get
pro rabates on an MZ-5n. "
I've never heard that before. Does this work like the
Nikon pro service? For example, if you can prove
you're a "pro" photographer, Nikon will loan you
equipment (e.g. like a 600mm f4) for short-term
use/even
Pål wrote:
"Personally, I don't think Pentax will ever make a
"pro" camera, medium
format or not (some don't consider pentax MF pro
because they lack
interchangeable film magazines). All Pentax medium
format cameras has been
quite faithful faximile of 35mm cameras, yes - even
amateur ones.
Pen
Bruce wrote:
> It is amazing how the list continues to wish/hope for a pro-level slr
> when Pentax has not made one since the LX.
Not so amazing as long as Pentax engineers and bosses insist on it.
>Pentax has been quite clear that
> their pro market is medium format.
When? Where? If you go
Like I said, no production 350 Hemi. GM didn't make "Hemi's". I used to
read the 1953 Dodge, and then 1965 Plymouth service manuals that my
father kept under his seat in the car.
BR
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
345 and 360 HEMIs were available in Australia in dodge and chrysler
variants until the
On Tue, 18 Feb 2003, Mike Johnston wrote:
> And when you replace the asterisk with a "D," you get what the *ist is gonna
> be on this list.
If it doesn't work with K, M and M42 adapter lenses, you'll want to use
hte letter P to describe the feeligns 'round here.
(at least they didn't call it Kis
345 and 360 HEMIs were available in Australia in dodge and chrysler
variants until the ealry 1980's Bruce. The 'famous' 350 was a GM motor
from the corvette AFAIK. They are still using the GEN 111 350 motor in
'muscle cars' from Holden (GM)in Oz now.
Cheers
Shaun
Bruce Rubenstein wrote:
I don
Mike,
It is amazing how the list continues to wish/hope for a pro-level slr
when Pentax has not made one since the LX. Even the MZ-S was not
fully embraced by the list members. Pentax has been quite clear that
their pro market is medium format.
Seems to me that this is exactly the type of camer
> LOL. But the name sucks indeed. We all know that the asterisk is a
> placeholder. If you replace it with a "M", the you have the German word
> for dung or trash... =:-]
Heiko,
And when you replace the asterisk with a "D," you get what the *ist is gonna
be on this list.
--Mike
Quoth Wendy:
> And it ~is~ a stupid name. Still not as stupid as Kiss, Sweet and Rebel
> though. No way would I ever buy a camera with those names!
If a really spiffy camera with an uber-dorky name fell into my
hands, I'd certainly use it ... and make fun of the name the
whole time. I've got no
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>I don't mind it, oddly. The name however sucks worse than a Hoover with a
>350 hemi undert the hood. (With apologies to Wendy Beard and Tim Allen)
>
Apology accepted. I don't have a clue what a 350 hemi is anyway. Under 't
hood or otherwise ;-)
And it ~is~ a stupid nam
>I don't think that there ever was a production 350 Hemi. 426, 413 were
>the famous ones. There were even some hemi head V8s from the early 50's
>in the sub 300ci range.
>
>BR
Thanks Brucey-baby. I was just trying (and failing) to get into the US
car-lingo. Actually I have built a Rover V8 (213
This might only be the designation in Japan. Many camera companies seem
to give cute names to cameras for the home market and then give it an
alpha-numeric model designation for the rest of the world.
BR
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
LOL. But the name sucks indeed. We all know that the asterisk is
Hi Cotty,
on 18 Feb 03 you wrote in pentax.list:
>Heiko, I'll bet it look spretty neat in black ;-)
OK, I'll order a piece of *ist, two FAJ-lenses and a can of black
paint...:-)
>I don't mind it, oddly. The name however sucks worse than a Hoover with a
>350 hemi undert the hood.
LOL. But the
I don't think that there ever was a production 350 Hemi. 426, 413 were
the famous ones. There were even some hemi head V8s from the early 50's
in the sub 300ci range.
BR
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
I don't mind it, oddly. The name however sucks worse than a Hoover with a
350 hemi undert the hood
On Tue, 18 Feb 2003, [iso-8859-1] Pål Jensen wrote:
> Nothing for us? Although I'm dissapointed by it's look as have heard
> it was very stylish. I think it is ugly. Anyway, it is very feature
I won't go ugly, but it looks sort of like it wants to be a Canon camera
with teh big wheel thingy on the
First look at 550
http://www.letsgodigital.nl/webpages/events/PMA-2003/news/pentax/Optio55
0_uk.html
on 18.02.03 16:39, Rob Brigham at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Interesting - the film chamber is on the right!?!?
Maybe *ist pull out all of the film then frame after frame rewind in the
cartridge?
>
> It seems to have the same type of on/off switch as MZ-S (perhaps DOF
> too?), no self timer but
It takes A-series lenses.
Dario Bonazza
> Doesn't say if it will take the SMCP(K), M,or A series lenses. (I'd bet
> on A but who knows).
Interesting - the film chamber is on the right!?!?
It seems to have the same type of on/off switch as MZ-S (perhaps DOF
too?), no self timer but a remote control option, a top wheel which has
no markings (presumably for shutter and/or aperture) and some sort of
button just in front of it (to shift
Hi Pål,
on 18 Feb 03 you wrote in pentax.list:
>> They have released those FAJ lenses and the "world's smallest" SLR
>> *ist. Nothing for us...
>Nothing for us?
Yes, because:
>I think it is ugly.
I second that;-)
But you're right - the features are very interesting. We will have to
see, h
on 18.02.03 16:25, Pål Jensen at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Nothing for us? Although I'm dissapointed by it's look as have heard it was
> very stylish. I think it is ugly. Anyway, it is very feature laden, almost
> completely featured, with 11 point AF and cross sensors and 16 zone metering.
It s
> They have released those FAJ lenses and the "world's smallest" SLR
> *ist. Nothing for us...
Well, I, for one, think 11-point AF and 16-segment metering are at least
worth mentioning. I also kinda like the shape of the camera, though I'd like
to look at the top plate first.
Regards,
Lukasz
==
Doesn't say if it will take the SMCP(K), M,or A series lenses. (I'd bet
on A but who knows).
At 04:15 PM 2/18/2003 +0100, you wrote:
on 18.02.03 16:04, Heiko Hamann at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Here we go: www.dpreview.com
>
> They have released those FAJ lenses and the "world's smallest" SL
Heiko wrote:
> They have released those FAJ lenses and the "world's smallest" SLR
> *ist. Nothing for us...
Nothing for us? Although I'm dissapointed by it's look as have heard it was very
stylish. I think it is ugly. Anyway, it is very feature laden, almost completely
featured, with 11 poi
on 18.02.03 16:04, Heiko Hamann at [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
> Here we go: www.dpreview.com
>
> They have released those FAJ lenses and the "world's smallest" SLR
> *ist. Nothing for us...
*ist - interesting - "Sophisticated 11-point autofocus system with
cross-shaped AF point selector and LED v
Hi Heiko,
on 18 Feb 03 you wrote in pentax.list:
>Here we go: www.dpreview.com
>They have released those FAJ lenses and the "world's smallest" SLR
>*ist. Nothing for us...
But it has some very nice features:
-
1. Ultra-compac
> Anyway, she got to talking about why she was renting the Pentax. Seems
> her less than a year old mamiya 645 (the beginner model, I think), was
> in the shop for the third time. God, she was pissed!
Tom,
A maker of carriage-trade view cameras, who shall go unnamed, once told me
that his principa
> Think Bronica GS-1 with a revolving back.
> Or a Mamiya RB with good lenses and mechanical reliability.
I don't see either of those as being any smaller than the current 6x7.
--Mike
third time. God, she was pissed!
She really liked the Pentax too.
tv
> -Original Message-
> From: Peter Alling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
> Sent: Monday, February 17, 2003 4:11 PM
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: New 67 (WAS: Re: PMA News (WAS: Re: Great LX
>
ED]
> Subject: Re: New 67 (WAS: Re: PMA News (WAS: Re: Great LX
> news!))
>
>
> I'm sorry but I have a hard time imagining entirely
> mythical devices, warp
> drive is much easier.
>
> At 03:00 PM 2/17/2003 -0600, William Robb wrote:
>
>
> &
> -Original Message-
> From: Pål Jensen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
> William wrote:
>
> > Think Bronica GS-1 with a revolving back.
> > Or a Mamiya RB with good lenses and mechanical reliability.
>
> But they are not compact. The fact that the new 67 is more
> compact than the current one
Something like that would be a beast, like a GS-1.
And, they'd lose their flattest-film-plane advantage
that helps keep the 67 on top.
Personally, I'd like to see a 67 with a coupled rangefinder
on top, electronically linked to a focus sensor.
Lighter and more versatile.
Imagine, all the advantage
- Original Message -
From: "Pål Jensen"
Subject: Re: New 67 (WAS: Re: PMA News (WAS: Re: Great LX news!))
>
> But they are not compact. The fact that the new 67 is more compact than
the current one is the only feature leaked out so far.
That will be some fea
I'm sorry but I have a hard time imagining entirely mythical devices, warp
drive is much easier.
At 03:00 PM 2/17/2003 -0600, William Robb wrote:
Or a Mamiya RB with good lenses and mechanical reliability.
William Robb
Outside of a dog, a book is man's best friend.
Inside of a dog, it'
William wrote:
> Think Bronica GS-1 with a revolving back.
> Or a Mamiya RB with good lenses and mechanical reliability.
But they are not compact. The fact that the new 67 is more compact than the current
one is the only feature leaked out so far.
Pål
- Original Message -
From: "Pål Jensen"
Subject: New 67 (WAS: Re: PMA News (WAS: Re: Great LX news!))
> William wrote:
>
> > I would welcome a 6x7 that was shaped more like the 645.
>
> Very unlikely as the 645 shape is defined by the "weird&quo
William wrote:
> I would welcome a 6x7 that was shaped more like the 645.
Very unlikely as the 645 shape is defined by the "weird" film travel. A 67, at least
without interchangeable backs, will have shape dictated by the film chamber something
that mean a camera close to the shape of the curre
On Monday 17 February 2003 12:30, Pål Jensen wrote:
> surprises revealed the day the show start (when is that?).
2 March - 5 March 2003
--
Frits Wüthrich
Pentaxianado
>Sorry, it was a sick joke.
>Steve Larson
>Redondo Beach, California
No, I got mine yesterday. Really!
Cotty
Oh, swipe me! He paints with light!
http://www.macads.co.uk/snaps/
Free UK Macintosh Classified Ads at
http://www
http://pma2003.pmai.org/
12 days, 21 hours to go!
> -Original Message-
> From: Pål Jensen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>
> Most likely we will get the "boring" news before the show.
> Pentax have a tradition of surprise so I would expect the
> more interesting news to be surprises revea
Rob wrote:
> Its like many things in life, its all about building a relationship with
> a supplier. You can entice them with promises of what you offer, you
> can demonstrate that you are up to the job by showing published work or
> you can be famout enough that they approach you and try to butt
Mr Chan posted:
In order to capture that market,
> >> Toyota
> >> invented another brand name called "Lexus" which was believed to copy
> >> Benz
> >> in many ways. People don't think the brand PENTAX as a luxury brand,
> >> or
> >> professional as Canon or Nikon. In order to change the percept
>
> On Friday, January 31, 2003, at 07:08 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
> > Mr Chan posted, among other things:
> >> Except there is one difference. It doesn't matter how luxurious a
> >> Toyota is,
> >> it's still a Toyota to most people. In order to capture that market,
> >> Toyota
> >> inv
On Friday, January 31, 2003, at 07:08 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Mr Chan posted, among other things:
Except there is one difference. It doesn't matter how luxurious a
Toyota is,
it's still a Toyota to most people. In order to capture that market,
Toyota
invented another brand name called "
On Friday, January 31, 2003, at 04:57 PM, Alan Chan wrote:
Imagine a cell phone with a "dial" instead of buttons. :)
regards,
Alan Chan
Cool
Dan Scott
kind of prices.
I've bought computers, cameras, cell phones this way and re-sold them. Never
heard of anybody giving one away though.
Feroze
- Original Message -
From: "Peter Alling" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Friday, January 31, 2003 6:59
I don't live in Europe, and suspect that you are once again full of shit.
BR
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Actually, most japanese manufacturers have tried to taylor exclusive cars for Europe but all have failed. Examples includes the Honda Accord that was designed and manufactured in Europe (but no
Huh? Are you sure that you don't mean Infiniti? There are loads of the
Lexus SUVs around (Ugh!).
BR
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Lexus sales are not very good in the US either. The brand was a one-hit
wonder. Their styling is stagnant, their marketing, nonexistent.
Mr Chan posted, among other things:
> Except there is one difference. It doesn't matter how luxurious a Toyota is,
> it's still a Toyota to most people. In order to capture that market, Toyota
> invented another brand name called "Lexus" which was believed to copy Benz
> in many ways. People don
1 - 100 of 182 matches
Mail list logo
