Mike wrote:
> I don't see what is so bad about Pentax making a camera that is as good as
> the D100, which is one of the best-selling, best-performing DSLRs on the
> world market. Seems like a pretty good mark to hit to me.
If I wanted a Nikon I would have bought one. I've never been a closet Nik
> I think it is very well specified camera in small body but its presentation
> and design is very derivative. You could remove the Pentax name with Nikon or
> perhaps Minolta and no one would have noticed. In this is the real point; no
> one except those with K-mount lenses will notice. I had expe
Mike wrote:
> Pål,
> I'm surprised you're being so critical. I think the *ist D is very
> attractively styled, and it's certainly eliciting a lot of excited
> utterances around here. And there's certainly nothing wrong with the Sony 6
> mp sensor--it's a very good sensor and 6 mp is the ideal size
>> It wouldn't be half bad if it sold like F80s.
>
>
> But why should it? It is not that the *Ist D is bad in any way. But it is an
> also ran looking like a F80 with sensor of a one year old Nikon DSLR. The only
> selling point will be price. Lets just hope that the compettition does not put
> o
Pål wrote:
..."looking like a F80
with sensor of a one year old Nikon DSLR."
Hmm. Is this camera going to suffer the same fate
as the Pz-1/p Too similar top the competition
--- _Jensen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Bruce wrote:
>
>
> > It wouldn't be half bad if it sold like F80s.
Jensen [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Sent: 27 February 2003 15:10
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: *istd: first visual impression
>
>
> Bruce wrote:
>
>
> > It wouldn't be half bad if it sold like F80s.
>
>
> But why should it? It is not that the
Bruce wrote:
> It wouldn't be half bad if it sold like F80s.
But why should it? It is not that the *Ist D is bad in any way. But it is an also ran
looking like a F80 with sensor of a one year old Nikon DSLR. The only selling point
will be price. Lets just hope that the compettition does not p
It wouldn't be half bad if it sold like F80s.
BR
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
Instead we got something that looks like a Nikon F80.
Alin wrote:
> Wheels a la PZ-1p! What a disappointment... impacts significantly on
> the design and makes it more of a C/N clone. The film *ist is more
> stylish and distinguishable.
I agree. I have no doubt that it will appeal to people sitting on old K-mount glass,
but it won't steal a s
9 matches
Mail list logo