I think 10 years is an overshoot. Of course, you ain't
young no more, and it might take longer. I've been playing
fretted instruments (mostly guitar) since 1964. If you discount
1964 to 1968 as adolescent idiocy (and you should), I learned
one _hell of a lot_ between 68 and 72. Enough to write
"Choral music never bores me, photography does. Too many photographs
are
alike. Maybe the variation in music is bigger. Also, the human factor
may be
bigger: singing and conducting is something you do yourself. It's as
personal as it can get."
Funny how I feel the opposite. Most choral music soun
Seconded. Nice shot in a place hard to get to.
Mark Cassino wrote:
Congrats again, Ken!
On 19/9/03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
>I am at the level in music that you seem to be in photography. I took
>two, two long years, wow, of lessons and still can not get what I want
>out of my mandolin.
!
I'll play with you any time you like Tom.
Musicalia accoustic, bought in 1995. Haven't
> Graywolf dude wrote:
> The interesting thing is that while the pros are dumping their darkroom
> stuff, many amateurs are setting up darkrooms (especially for B&W work)
> because there is a certain joy to doing things the old way. One can in
> fact set u
400
> To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Subject: Re: OT: Pentax Image in Outdoor Photographer
> Resent-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Resent-Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2003 13:40:04 -0400
>
> Boy are you in trouble. The thing about digital to the serious
> photographer is it brings all those controls
3 08:47:00 -0400
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: OT: Pentax Image in Outdoor Photographer
> Resent-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Resent-Date: Fri, 19 Sep 2003 08:47:22 -0400
>
> I don't think this is negative, I think it's the just the extreme
> expression of
- Original Message -
From: "Paul Delcour"
Subject: Re: OT: Pentax Image in Outdoor Photographer
> What I
>certainly do not like about photgraphy is the amount of technique I need to
>get a picture rigt. I feel the technique is more a burden than a blessing.
> As
the way I handle all my images that I either post
or
> print.
>
> Kenneth Waller
>
> - Original Message -----
> From: "Paul Delcour" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 5:37 AM
> Subject: Re: OT
In a message dated 9/19/2003 12:49:47 AM Pacific Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
The absurd limits
of a film for instance. I hope that digital solves this all in due course.
Paul Delcour
I hadn't really thought about this before. Interesting idea.
Marnie aka Doe
print.
>
> Kenneth Waller
>
> - Original Message -
> From: "Paul Delcour" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2003 5:37 AM
> Subject: Re: OT: Pentax Image in Outdoor Photographer
>
>
ris Liberman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2003 06:50:57 +0200
> > To: Kenneth Waller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> > Subject: Re: OT: Pentax Image in Outdoor Photographer
> > Resent-From: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> > Resent-Da
Congrats again, Ken!
- MCC
At 03:32 PM 9/17/2003 -0400, you wrote:
Well, after being advised a year ago that an image of mine was selected for
publication in Outdoor Photographer, "Your Gallery" section, it finally
appeared in the October 2003 issue. Check out pages 80/81 of that issue -
the "You
Boris Liberman wrote:
>
> Here's the correct URL:
> http://pug.komkon.org/01jul/IceFlwer.html
>
> Congratulations.
Seconded. Wonderful image. Well done Kenneth!
John
Hi!
Here's the correct URL:
http://pug.komkon.org/01jul/IceFlwer.html
Congratulations.
Boris
===8<==Original message text===
KW> Well, after being advised a year ago that an image of mine was selected for
KW> publication in Outdoor Photographer, "Your Gallery" section,
On 17/9/03, [EMAIL PROTECTED] disgorged:
>Well, after being advised a year ago that an image of mine was selected for
>publication in Outdoor Photographer, "Your Gallery" section, it finally
>appeared in the October 2003 issue. Check out pages 80/81 of that issue -
Well done Ken. I'll keep em pee
Thanks Ken,
You mentioned several months ago that it would be in OP, and I've been looking,
in vain. I was afraid that I'd missed it or something. Now I'm relieved to
find that I haven't.
I think I may have already congratulated you, but what the hell, I'll do it
again! It's a great photo, and
Ken wrote:
>Had a pleasant surprise today. Got a nice check from Outdoor Photographer
>for an image of mine (posted in the July 01 PUG
>http://pug.komkon.org/01jul/IceFlwr.html).
Great shot! (One of my all-time PUG favorites, in fact.)
Congratulations!
--
Mark Roberts
Photography and writing
ww
Great job, Ken - I'll have to get down to the news stand and grab a copy!
- MCC
At 03:20 PM 7/12/2003 -0400, you wrote:
Had a pleasant surprise today. Got a nice check from Outdoor Photographer
for an image of mine (posted in the July 01 PUG
http://pug.komkon.org/01jul/IceFlwr.html). I had submit
Geez, Ken,
I looked at the subject line, and figured it was just a pic taken with a Pentax
camera. You're being too modest! I've adjusted the subject line accordingly,
however.
Congrats!! It's a photograph worthy of publication. Great job.
cheers,
frank
Kenneth Waller wrote:
> Had a plea
By the way... thanks for pointing me in that direction. Procrastination led me
to browse the rest of the images, and as it turns out,
http://pug.komkon.org/01jul/
That was a pretty good gallery. Obviously your shot was a winner, but there
were a few others, too. I especially like Smirnov Andre
Congrats, Ken.
For everyone else, here's the proper link, by the way (other one was faulty).
http://pug.komkon.org/01jul/IceFlwer.html
my question is, were they going to pay you had you not been persistent / on top
of things and called?
Congrats, Ken.
Um, can I get an autographed copy?? ;-}
See you soon
-Original Message-
From: Kenneth Waller [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: July 12, 2003 3:21 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject:Pentax Image in Outdoor Photographer
Had a pleasant surprise today. Got
Had a pleasant surprise today. Got a nice check from Outdoor Photographer
for an image of mine (posted in the July 01 PUG
http://pug.komkon.org/01jul/IceFlwr.html). I had submitted it last year for
a section called "Your Gallery". I was contacted & told it would be
published in an upcoming issue. W
Thanks for reminding me. I have used a Rebel G and a
Rebel 2000. So, I should revise and say that it does
have something to do with the camera. :)
--- Norm Baugher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You obviously have never used a Canon :-)
> Norm
>
> Debra Wilborn wrote:
>
> >It just goes to show
25 matches
Mail list logo
