Mark Roberts wrote:
mike wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I like two strokes, too.
Q: How can you tell an RD-350 rider?
A: By the scratches on the shin bar of his helmet... from where the
steering stem nut keeps hitting it. ;-)
I thought it was the racing crouch at the bar and the const
mike wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>I like two strokes, too.
Q: How can you tell an RD-350 rider?
A: By the scratches on the shin bar of his helmet... from where the
steering stem nut keeps hitting it. ;-)
--
Mark Roberts
Photography and writing
www.robertstech.com
"William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>From: "Mark Roberts"
>
>> mike wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>>Now we know: Mark Roberts _is_ the Crazy Frog!!!
>>
>> I think I'm missing some point of reference here (or at least I hope I
>> am!)
>> Crazy frog?
>
>Don't worry Mark. Anyone who
Mark Roberts wrote:
mike wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Now we know: Mark Roberts _is_ the Crazy Frog!!!
I think I'm missing some point of reference here (or at least I hope I
am!)
Crazy frog?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crazy_Frog
8-)
I like two strokes, too.
Try here Mark.
http://www.crazy-frogs.com/
Proof positive that just because it sells doesn't make it good. :-)
Dave
On 7/2/05, Mark Roberts <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> mike wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >Now we know: Mark Roberts _is_ the Crazy Frog!!!
>
> I think I'm missing some p
- Original Message -
From: "Mark Roberts"
Subject: Re: PESO: The Nabours Harley
mike wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Now we know: Mark Roberts _is_ the Crazy Frog!!!
I think I'm missing some point of reference here (or at least I hope I
am!)
Crazy fro
mike wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Now we know: Mark Roberts _is_ the Crazy Frog!!!
I think I'm missing some point of reference here (or at least I hope I
am!)
Crazy frog?
--
Mark Roberts
Photography and writing
www.robertstech.com
Mark Roberts wrote:
keithw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Tom Reese wrote:
It's a Sportster. The pipes appear to be Screamin' Eagle slip on
mufflers. Loud enough to be heard but not enough to be obnoxious (IMO).
Ah Hah!
One person's sweet melody is another's raucous cacophony! B-)
Aw, y
keithw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>Tom Reese wrote:
>> It's a Sportster. The pipes appear to be Screamin' Eagle slip on
>> mufflers. Loud enough to be heard but not enough to be obnoxious (IMO).
>>
>Ah Hah!
>
>One person's sweet melody is another's raucous cacophony! B-)
Aw, yer makin' me all
keithw wrote:
Tom Reese wrote:
...The pipes appear to be Screamin' Eagle slip on
mufflers. Loud enough to be heard but not enough to be obnoxious (IMO).
Ah Hah!
One person's sweet melody is another's raucous cacophony! B-)
Huh? I don't hear so well these days.
Tom Reese
Tom Reese wrote:
Tim Øsleby wrote:
I was expecting that question ;-)
I believe she said it is a Sportster, whatever it is, if I know her
husband
right, it is heavyly modified. The engine is an 883cc, does that mean
anything to you?
It's a Sportster. The pipes appear to be Screamin' Eagle
Tim Øsleby wrote:
I was expecting that question ;-)
I believe she said it is a Sportster, whatever it is, if I know her husband
right, it is heavyly modified. The engine is an 883cc, does that mean
anything to you?
Tim
883 cc = 50 cu.in. displacement. A quite reasonable size.
I haven't looked
Tim Øsleby wrote:
I was expecting that question ;-)
I believe she said it is a Sportster, whatever it is, if I know her husband
right, it is heavyly modified. The engine is an 883cc, does that mean
anything to you?
It's a Sportster. The pipes appear to be Screamin' Eagle slip on
mufflers. Loud
Tim Øsleby wrote:
(This is a follow up on a post I submitted some minutes ago. The original
mail seems to still be floating around in cyber space, but the a copy is
under this follow up.)
BTW. Please feel free to comment online. That would be splendid.
At bottom of page there is a link "Tryk
(Very freely after Arthur C. Clarke, or some other clever guy)
-Original Message-
From: keithw [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 1. juli 2005 18:44
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: PESO: The Nabours Harley
Tim Øsleby wrote:
> While testing my troublesome "new" Vivitar
Tim Øsleby wrote:
While testing my troublesome "new" Vivitar Series 1 lens yesterday I
accidentally did this shot.
http://foto.no/cgi-bin/bildegalleri/vis_bilde.cgi?id=182778
What kind of Harley _is_ that...other than unmuffled, that is!
keith whaley
It was heavily overexposed, but it see
While testing my troublesome "new" Vivitar Series 1 lens yesterday I
accidentally did this shot.
http://foto.no/cgi-bin/bildegalleri/vis_bilde.cgi?id=182778
It was heavily overexposed, but it seemed to have a strange quality. Now I
have played a bit with it. Adjusting the shadow up, and the expo
Tim Øsleby [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 1. juli 2005 17:40
To: 'pentax-discuss@pdml.net'
Subject: PESO: The Nabours Harley
While testing my troublesome "new" Vivitar Series 1 lens yesterday I
accidentally did this shot.
http://foto.no/cgi-bin/bildegalleri/vis_bilde.cgi?id=18
18 matches
Mail list logo
