That could be arranged :-).
> In a message dated 6/27/2005 9:16:38 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> I got her on the
> > > approach as well (she smiled). But I like this shot better:
> > >
> > > http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3487689
> >
>
> Ummm, wou
Thanks Jerome. I tend to like lenses that soften without distorting. The lenses
that seem to draw the most complaints in regard to boke, distort the background
a great deal, yielding strange patterns. The degree of softness in the
background is more a function of the spatial relationships of len
In a message dated 6/27/2005 9:16:38 A.M. Central Daylight Time,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
I got her on the
> > approach as well (she smiled). But I like this shot better:
> >
> > http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3487689
>
Ummm, would it be possible for those of us who like appr
>
> From: frank theriault <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2005/06/27 Mon PM 01:07:32 GMT
> To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> Subject: Re: PESO: Detail of Two Ice Creams and a Wide Open Shot
>
> On 6/26/05, Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > For all
> I tend to like the bokeh that this lens yields. It smooths
> without distorting.
> Paul
Actually, that was my first thought on both of the photos that you've
posted as examples. In this one, in particular,
http://www.photo.net/photodb/photo?photo_id=3487689
DOF selection did you quite well. *V
Thanks Frank. Yes, straps are in this year. A common sight on the street these
days. I tend to like the bokeh that this lens yields. It smooths without
distorting.
Paul
> On 6/26/05, Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > For all those with an interest in the DA 50-200, here's a 200% de
On 6/26/05, Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For all those with an interest in the DA 50-200, here's a 200% detail
> from the girl with two ice creams shot. I think it was Denny who said
> he saw a drip. Bingo! He get's the eagle eye award. I think the
> sharpness is good for this large
Hi Bob,
I'm not sure about that one. I looked at it at 400%, and it's not as
round and uniform as the other drop. What's more, it's right on the
headlight ring, which does show another specular highlight. Might be a
drip, might be a highlight. We'll probably never know. Just another
example of
Paul,
Look for another drop below the 1st, just above the auto head lamp.
Regards, Bob S.
On 6/26/05, Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Thanks David. I have to admit I never saw the drip. If I noticed it at
> all, I must have assumed it was a highlight on the hood of the car.
> I think
Thanks David. I have to admit I never saw the drip. If I noticed it at
all, I must have assumed it was a highlight on the hood of the car.
I think any Pentax lens, save perhaps J or Takumar-K series lenses, can
deliver at least very good results. I believe the exceptions we see are
either due to
On 6/27/05, Paul Stenquist <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> For all those with an interest in the DA 50-200, here's a 200% detail
> from the girl with two ice creams shot. I think it was Denny who said
> he saw a drip. Bingo! He get's the eagle eye award. I think the
> sharpness is good for this large
For all those with an interest in the DA 50-200, here's a 200% detail
from the girl with two ice creams shot. I think it was Denny who said
he saw a drip. Bingo! He get's the eagle eye award. I think the
sharpness is good for this large a magnification. There's a bit of CA
where the straw dontr
12 matches
Mail list logo
