Picked up a book recently and I'm finding it very interesting and
affecting to my photography, although it is not a book about
photography ...
"Seeing Is Forgetting The Name Of The Thing One Sees
A Life of Contemporary Artist Robert Irwin" by Lawrence Weschler
I don't recall where I heard
My brother actually reads technical stuff..
William Robb
- Original Message -
From: "Jim Robb"
Subject: Re: Interesting read for those who buy CD's and DVDs
Scary. I just love Article 10 para 2 of the EULA, where you waive your
right to trial by jury in any
http://www.spaceweather.com/
Tom C.
Message text written by INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>I see quite a point in shooting on film and have it later scanned.
Though recently Luminous Landscape keep praising latest Canon 11 MP
camera up to the point of mentioning that it has virtually no noise at
virtually all ISO settings.<
i don't thi
Boris is cool.
-Lon
frank theriault wrote:
>
> Hi, Boris,
>
> You'll fit in nicely here!
>
> cheers,
> frank
>
> Boris Liberman wrote:
>
> >
> >
> > Sorry, I am getting wordy again.
> >
> > ---
> > Boris Liberman
>
> --
> "The optimist thinks this is the best of all possible worlds. The
Boris,
You worry too much about progress. Digital Cams have a LOT of problems.
Tried them, don't like them. Most are still toys.
Give it 5 years, ok? Grin.
Lon
Boris Liberman wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> In my personal humble opinion the question of fate of film is more of
> philosophical than of pr
I don't know how true this is, but... I have heard that the new High power
x-ray machines used for checked luggage can fry electronic devices.
At 10:24 AM 12/9/2002 -0500, you wrote:
This is an interesting argument. In addition, you could easily conceive
of airport security making film impracti
Comments below, where appropriate:
"Ryan K. Brooks" wrote:
>
> Boris Liberman wrote:
>
> >Take DVD and VHS for example. If you were a video professional, you
> >might want to put your latest and greatest on DVD. For home use (such
> >as recording some repeating program that happens to be broadca
On 12/9/02 8:07 AM, mike wilson wrote:
> Boris wrote:
>> They predict that in few years you would be able to run your
>> laptop for 10 hours straight and all you'd need do to recharge it
>> would be to replace a small container with some fluid that would be
>> sold for few pennies everywhere...
>
Message text written by INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>This is an interesting argument. In addition, you could easily conceive
of airport security making film impractical for travel. Although they
will have to make some accommodation for electronic storage devices
these days, I could easily see them
Hi,
Boris wrote:
> They predict that in few years you would be able to run your
> laptop for 10 hours straight and all you'd need do to recharge it
> would be to replace a small container with some fluid that would be
> sold for few pennies everywhere...
And 50 years ago, in the UK, they said tha
- Original Message -
From: Steve Desjardins
Subject: Re: Interesting read
> This is an interesting argument. In addition, you could
easily conceive
> of airport security making film impractical for travel.
Although they
> will have to make some accommodation for electroni
This is an interesting argument. In addition, you could easily conceive
of airport security making film impractical for travel. Although they
will have to make some accommodation for electronic storage devices
these days, I could easily see them saying "this will damage film -
sorry" for random c
On 9 Dec 2002 at 15:17, Boris Liberman wrote:
> Hi!
>
> In my personal humble opinion the question of fate of film is more of
> philosophical than of practical nature.
Hi Boris,
Sorry to cut your well presented argument short but it could be as simple as
the introduction of governmental EPA c
Hi!
In my personal humble opinion the question of fate of film is more of
philosophical than of practical nature. You see, I don't think that
any of us, even if there are people here that work for photo
companies, such as Pentax itself, can reasonably well predict what
will happen in the technolog
Message text written by INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>I only use slide film when shooting for my own purposes. I used to
bracket a fair bit but now seldom bracket. Sometimes when the scene is
greater then film latitude I bracket in one direction by up to one stop
from what I think would produce the
Message text written by INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>Always? Wow. Any other nature folks out there always bracket?
Herb, is this +- a half, a third, or a whole stop?
<
because of the subjects i shoot and the lighting i like to shoot in, the
bracketing for me usually is metered, metered -1/2, and
Lon Williamson wrote:
>
> Always? Wow. Any other nature folks out there always bracket?
> Herb, is this +- a half, a third, or a whole stop?
>
> Herb Chong wrote, in part:
>
> > I always bracket my film
> > at least 3 frames and so
I only use slide film when shooting for my own purposes.
I always bracket if I'm using slide film. With print -- colour or b/w, I
don't.
Brad
- Original Message -
From: "Lon Williamson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Saturday, December 07, 2002 1:09 AM
Subject: Re: Interesting read
> Al
Hi, Feroze,
If it's "artificial", it ain't "beer"!!
And, while I'm on the subject, "0% alcohol beer", "decaffinated coffee", and
"caffine-free Coke" are oxymorons. I mean, hell, why bother, if you take the
good stuff out?
cheers,
frank
Feroze Kistan wrote:
> Hi Frank
> But I suppose some
I know the E-10 is an older camera, but it takes FOREVER to download
images, never mind adjust them. Even though the film drop-off takes
days, it's time I have to wait not waste. . .
Steven Desjardins
Department of Chemistry
Washington and Lee University
Lexington, VA 24450
(540) 458-8873
FAX: (
You are entirely right Bruce. A friend of mine shoots professional sports
shots for Football, baseball hockey Opeegee (Sp?)card company and admits that
it's the time after he has his shots that is killing him. he still loves
digital, but did not realize the work involved after he has the photogr
You may very well be right. As I don't have a digital camera that I
would consider using for a wedding, I haven't submitted to them any
real quantities. Coupled with that, my Coolpix exhibits many of the
weaknesses of the average P&S (weak flash, heavy redeye, slow AF,
etc).
Bruce
Thursday,
Message text written by INTERNET:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>In weddings and portraits, you are talking a much bigger volume of
keepers (not because technically they are all superb shots, but
because they record an event) that have to be dealt with.<
i shot a wedding for a friend as the backup photographer
On 5 Dec 2002 at 13:58, Bruce Dayton wrote:
> I guess I should follow on with this, that it may be heavily affected
> by the type of photography you do. If you are shooting scenics and
> only have to prepare a few per session, it may well be worth it. If,
> like me, you shoot a wedding with 200 s
Frank Theriault wrote:
> I think that film will end up being analogous (no pun intended)
> to vinyl records
> (anyone remember those?) Back when CD's came out in the early
> 80's, they gave
> vinyl about 10 years. And, for a while it was damn hard to find
> vinyl at the
> mainstream record store
able to be both, but
not the volume photographers.
Bruce
Thursday, December 5, 2002, 2:42:47 PM, you wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Bruce Dayton [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
>> Sent: Thursday, December 05, 2002 4:59 PM
>> To: Bruce Dayton
>> Subje
My belief is that digital is definitely the future but that the future
isn't quite here yet (at least for me).
Shaun Canning wrote:
with 64 billion p&s cameras of various breeds floating around the
cosmos, which company do you think is going to be the first to
discontinue film? I can't see Eas
with 64 billion p&s cameras of various breeds floating around the
cosmos, which company do you think is going to be the first to
discontinue film? I can't see Eastman Kodak volunteering, and they are
into digital as much as anyone. It's just another market sector to milk.
Smart companies wil
Hi, Feroze,
I think that film will end up being analogous (no pun intended) to vinyl records
(anyone remember those?) Back when CD's came out in the early 80's, they gave
vinyl about 10 years. And, for a while it was damn hard to find vinyl at the
mainstream record stores, although small-label "
30 matches
Mail list logo
