Bob W wrote:
The British Museum publishes a series of modernised ancient
recipe books.
It's very interesting to try them out.
Are they available online?
Googlus amicus tuus est.
Sample recipes:
http://www.britishmuseum.co.uk/text.asp?page=recipe+1#R4
Bob W wrote:
The British Museum publishes a series of modernised ancient
recipe books.
It's very interesting to try them out.
Are they available online?
Googlus amicus tuus est.
For anyone else interested:
http://www.britishmuseum.co.uk/shops.asp?cat=101
Bob W wrote:
It's a classic "dip into" book. I must try to get an
original copy; mine is a paperback of dubious quality that I
suspect will not last much longer.
Déjà vu. I bought a copy of 'Steve McCurry' by Anthony Bannon yesterday. The
bookseller went into a hymn of praise about the qu
>
> It's a classic "dip into" book. I must try to get an
> original copy; mine is a paperback of dubious quality that I
> suspect will not last much longer.
>
Déjà vu. I bought a copy of 'Steve McCurry' by Anthony Bannon yesterday. The
bookseller went into a hymn of praise about the quality o
Bob W wrote:
I shall have a look through that tomorrow - it looks fascinating.
It's a classic "dip into" book. I must try to get an original copy;
mine is a paperback of dubious quality that I suspect will not last much
longer.
The British Museum publishes a series of modernised ancient
From: "Mishka" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
those who are "pissed eagles" are safe either in armored cars, or in the
middle of nowhere. pretty convenient.
This is an error in logic commonly called a "Hasty generalization" (Secundum
quid).
Land Rovers are not (commonly) armored and mine is factory st
A number of upscale eateries, including one somewhat toney place in NY, the
name of which I've forgotten, serve upscale versions of White Castle Burgers,
or "sliders" as their commonly called. The combination of the sauted onions,
thin burger, and pickle slice can be quite goood when prepared ju
I shall have a look through that tomorrow - it looks fascinating.
The British Museum publishes a series of modernised ancient recipe books.
It's very interesting to try them out.
--
Cheers,
Bob
> -Original Message-
> From: mike wilson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> You might like thi
not very
good.
--
Cheers,
Bob
-Original Message-
From: P. J. Alling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 16 July 2005 00:32
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: OT OT OT -- Re: Definitions WAS Re: London Bombing update
Well something like them has been, but what I had in Englan
J. Alling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 16 July 2005 00:32
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: OT OT OT -- Re: Definitions WAS Re: London Bombing update
Well something like them has been, but what I had in England
wasn't even close, and I'm not a big fan of McDonnalds.
White Tower hamburgers were better. Same size on a round bun (actually they
were bigger (3 bites). 12 for a buck. But those were walk in fast food places
for pedestrians (You stopped off after getting off the trolly and carried them
the rest of the way home) When the last pedestrian died they w
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
White Castle burgers were often called "belly bombs" . But what can
you expect for an 8-cent burger (yes, that's what they cost at one time!)
Shel
Yeah, 8¢, but remember they were not much bigger than a 50¢ piece!
More than once I got their 6 for a quarter, or whatev
White Castle burgers were often called "belly bombs" . But what can
you expect for an 8-cent burger (yes, that's what they cost at one time!)
Shel
> [Original Message]
> From: John Francis
> Anyone who considers McDonalds to be the nadir of bad hamburgers
> has never sampled the culinary d
On Sat, Jul 16, 2005 at 06:12:42AM +0100, Cotty wrote:
> On 15/7/05, P. J. Alling, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
> >I had hamburgers in England before the advent of McDonalds there...
> >Are you sure about that?
>
> Yes.
Anyone who considers McDonalds to be the nadir of bad hamburgers
has nev
On 16/7/05, Bob Sullivan, discombobulated, unleashed:
>So are you going to the one across the street (Oxford St.?) from the Pret,
>or the one out by the round-a-bout?
Oh, there's a small one near the TV studio in Abingdon. The class of
student they have in there beggars belief. I think one of the
So are you going to the one across the street (Oxford St.?) from the Pret,
or the one out by the round-a-bout?
(Just remember, if there's time to lean, there's time to clean.)
Regards, Bob S.
On 7/16/05, Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 15/7/05, Bob Sullivan, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
: Re: OT OT OT -- Re: Definitions WAS Re: London Bombing update
>
> Well something like them has been, but what I had in England
> wasn't even close, and I'm not a big fan of McDonnalds.
>
On 15/7/05, Bob Sullivan, discombobulated, unleashed:
>Big Macs have been known to grow hair on your head...
Just off to my job interview at the local McD's :-)
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
__
On 15/7/05, P. J. Alling, discombobulated, unleashed:
>I had hamburgers in England before the advent of McDonalds there...
>Are you sure about that?
Yes.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
- Original Message -
From: "Bob Sullivan"
Subject: Re: OT OT OT -- Re: Definitions WAS Re: London Bombing update
Cotty,
Big Macs have been known to grow hair on your head...
Wasn't that one of the slogans early on?
WW
Cotty,
Big Macs have been known to grow hair on your head...
Regards, Bob S.
On 7/15/05, Cotty <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> On 15/7/05, Bob Blakely, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
> >What is bleak about England and how is that attributed to the USA?
>
> I concede.
>
> McDonalds.
>
>
>
>
> C
On 7/15/05, Kenneth Waller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >that you better shut up, talking about "collateral damage".
>
> Or what
or you miay find it difficult to cope if (god forbid) someone close to you
becomes one. i think this is a really lame euphemism for "kids we killed
and don't gi
entax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: OT OT OT -- Re: Definitions WAS Re: London Bombing update
that you better shut up, talking about "collateral damage".
mishka
On 7/15/05, Kenneth Waller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >ever been one?
>
> There's alot I ha
unfortunately, it's people who are very unhappy with the current situation
who are paying the consequences. like in nyc, london and madrid.
those who are "pissed eagles" are safe either in armored cars, or in the
middle of nowhere. pretty convenient.
mishka
On 7/15/05, William Robb <[EMAIL PROTEC
nal Message-
> From: Mishka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Subject: Re: OT OT OT -- Re: Definitions WAS Re: London Bombing update
>
> ever been one?
>
> mishka
>
> On 7/14/05, Kenneth Waller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > Ever hear of colateral damage?
> >
> > Kenneth Waller
I think he's saying maybe McD's didn't make it worse.
Regards,
Bob...
-
"The art of taxation consists in so plucking the goose
as to obtain the largest possible amount of feathers
with the smallest possible amount of hissing."
- Jean
From: P. J. Alling [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sent: 16 July 2005 00:10
To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
Subject: Re: OT OT OT -- Re: Definitions WAS Re: London Bombing update
I had hamburgers in England before the advent of McDonalds there...
Are you sure about that?
Cotty wrote:
On 15/7/
Re: Definitions WAS Re: London Bombing update
>
> I had hamburgers in England before the advent of McDonalds there...
> Are you sure about that?
>
> Cotty wrote:
>
> >On 15/7/05, Bob Blakely, discombobulated, unleashed:
> >
> >
> >
> &g
I had hamburgers in England before the advent of McDonalds there...
Are you sure about that?
Cotty wrote:
On 15/7/05, Bob Blakely, discombobulated, unleashed:
What is bleak about England and how is that attributed to the USA?
I concede.
McDonalds.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
||
I wish I'd thought of that!
--
Cheers,
Bob
> -Original Message-
> From: Cotty [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
>
> On 15/7/05, Bob Blakely, discombobulated, unleashed:
>
> >What is bleak about England and how is that attributed to the USA?
>
> I concede.
>
> McDonalds.
Freedom is not free and it's not a capital asset. Each generation must pay
its price for liberty. We took the hit with Pearl Harbor and our merchant
marine took the hit supplying Briton during WWII. We were aware that the
consequences of stopping Hiro Hito and Hitler would be the taking of
hund
On 15/7/05, Bob Blakely, discombobulated, unleashed:
>What is bleak about England and how is that attributed to the USA?
I concede.
McDonalds.
Cheers,
Cotty
___/\__
|| (O) | People, Places, Pastiche
||=|http://www.cottysnaps.com
_
- Original Message -
From: "Bob Blakely"
Subject: Re: OT OT OT -- Re: Definitions WAS Re: London Bombing update
No one here is whining. We're mad as hell AND doing something about it -
and we're not asking your permission - and we're never going to. Get use
inister of finance to French King Louis XIV
- Original Message -
From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "Pentax Discuss"
Sent: Friday, July 15, 2005 10:13 AM
Subject: Re: OT OT OT -- Re: Definitions WAS Re: London Bombing update
- Original Message ---
- Original Message -
From: "Bob Blakely"
Subject: Re: OT OT OT -- Re: Definitions WAS Re: London Bombing update
Exactly what is it about what any other country allied with the USA which
is really not their own responsibility and choice?
Uhh Bob, you guys tie a lo
Ah... right...
From: "Kevin Waterson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
What I fear as an Australian is not so much the Taliban, Al Queada etc
it is America. Look at countries that have been allies of the USA in
the past. They look rather bleak now when they were so well before
being allied to the USofA[sic]
Believe what you want to believe.
Kenneth Waller
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Waterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: OT OT OT -- Re: Definitions WAS Re: London Bombing update
This one time, at band camp, Kenneth Waller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> These effe
>ever been one?
There's alot I haven't been.
What's your pount?
Kenneth Waller
-Original Message-
From: Mishka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: OT OT OT -- Re: Definitions WAS Re: London Bombing update
ever been one?
mishka
On 7/14/05, Kenneth Waller &
This one time, at band camp, Kenneth Waller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> These effects (killing of noncombatants in Baghdad) were secondary to the
> intended action (ridding the country of Saddam government).
All for a few drops of oil, unless you really believe the WMD story.
> I don't believe
- Original Message -
From: "Bob Blakely"
Subject: Re: OT OT OT -- Re: Definitions WAS Re: London Bombing update
Damn, Willie! I'd only hate ya for 90 seconds. My attention span isn't any
longer...
What were we arguing about?
Were we arguing?
William Robb
ever been one?
mishka
On 7/14/05, Kenneth Waller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Ever hear of colateral damage?
>
> Kenneth Waller
one who wants to kill others and doesn't mind killing
himself in the process.
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message -
From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: OT OT OT -- Re: Definitions WAS Re: London Bombing update
>
> - Original Message -
&
h the smallest possible amount of hissing."
- Jean-Baptiste Colbert,
minister of finance to French King Louis XIV
From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
- Original Message -
From: "Kenneth Waller"
Subject: Re: OT OT OT -- Re: Definitions WAS Re: L
sible amount of feathers
with the smallest possible amount of hissing."
- Jean-Baptiste Colbert,
minister of finance to French King Louis XIV
From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
- Original Message -
From: "Bob Blakely"
Subject: Re: OT OT OT --
- Original Message -
From: "Bob Blakely"
Subject: Re: OT OT OT -- Re: Definitions WAS Re: London Bombing update
You're being obtuse, Willie. Try just saying what you think.
I have too many friends of the American persuasion on list (you included, oh
Bombastic
- Original Message -
From: "Kenneth Waller"
Subject: Re: OT OT OT -- Re: Definitions WAS Re: London Bombing update
Ever hear of colateral damage?
Thats when a suicide bomber kills 18 children to get the 3 servicemen he was
after, right?
William Robb
tion of killing
innocents.
Sorry, but in war things get broken and people are killed (sometimes innocent
people).
Sorry if my message wasn't clearly stated.
Kenneth Waller
-Original Message-
From: Bob Blakely <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: OT OT OT -- Re: Definitions WAS
unt of hissing."
- Jean-Baptiste Colbert,
minister of finance to French King Louis XIV
From: "Kenneth Waller" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Ever hear of colateral damage?
Kenneth Waller
From: Kevin Waterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: OT OT OT -- Re: Definitions
Ever hear of colateral damage?
Kenneth Waller
-Original Message-
From: Kevin Waterson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: OT OT OT -- Re: Definitions WAS Re: London Bombing update
This one time, at band camp, "Bob Blakely" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The word
Hmm...
So you are saying that the Americans chose to instill terror in the
noncombatant Iraqi populous by targeting and destroying innocents such as
children, students, and the general Iraqi population irrespective of their
politics concerning Sadam's regime, and it was America's intention to
of hissing."
- Jean-Baptiste Colbert,
minister of finance to French King Louis XIV
From: "William Robb" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: "Bob Blakely"
Subject: Re: OT OT OT -- Re: Definitions WAS Re: London Bombing update
The word "terrorist" is used to
This one time, at band camp, "Bob Blakely" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> The word
> "terrorist" is used to denote a person who chooses to instill terror in a
> noncombatant populous by destroying innocents such as children, students,
> and or a general population regardless of their populous. I
- Original Message -
From: "Bob Blakely"
Subject: Re: OT OT OT -- Re: Definitions WAS Re: London Bombing update
The word "terrorist" is used to denote a person who chooses to instill
terror in a noncombatant populous by destroying innocents such as
children
--
From: "Bob Blakely" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Thursday, July 14, 2005 7:06 AM
Subject: Re: OT OT OT -- Re: Definitions WAS Re: London Bombing update
There's a lot of nonsense going on here wherein some folks are
saying that the word "terrorist" is being used
On Wed, 13 Jul 2005 22:06:46 -0700, Bob Blakely wrote:
> The word "terrorist" is used to denote a person who chooses to
> instill terror in a noncombatant populous by destroying innocents
> such as children, students, and or a general population regardless
> of their populous. It's a function of
possible amount of hissing."
- Jean-Baptiste Colbert,
minister of finance to French King Louis XIV
- Original Message -
From: "D. Glenn Arthur Jr." <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Tuesday, July 12, 2005 7:46 PM
Subject: OT OT OT -- Re: Definitions WAS Re: London Bomb
- Original Message -
From: "P. J. Alling"
Subject: Re: OT OT OT -- Re: Definitions WAS Re: London Bombing update
I don't want to get involved in this argument can you guys please take
it off list.
Hopefully, it's run it's course.
William Robb
Hi!
> that's *exactly* what i meant.
>
> best,
> mishka
Natural'no. V konce koncov u nas odin i tot zhe assembler :-).
Translation: Naturally. After all we share the same assembly :-)
Guys, Bill, Paul, et al, please take your very discussion off-list. Thanks.
--
Boris
> Paul
> On Jul 12, 2005, at 11:59 PM, William Robb wrote:
>
> >
> > ----- Original Message ----- Wrom: GVCJVTLBXF
> > Subject: Re: Definitions WAS Re: London Bombing update
> >
> >
> >> I want to hear you say that after they have killed some of
On Wed, 2005-07-13 at 12:32, William Robb wrote:
> We've seen what you do to countries that you consider a threat.
or not
On 7/13/05, mike wilson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> >
> > Wrom: NKMBIPBARHDMNNSKVFVWRKJVZCMHVIBG
> > Date: 2005/07/13 Wed AM 03:25:23 GMT
> > To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> > Subject: Re: Definitions WAS Re: London Bombing update
> >
> > I wa
Glenn,
If I didn't know better, I'd think you might be a conservative.
Hopefully Useful History:
Even during WWII the US, in a legitimate & moral war, used large-scale terror
tactics 4 times (that I'm familiar with). Hiroshima, Nagasaki, fire-bombing
Tokyo, and bombing the civilian target Dres
I don't want to get involved in this argument can you guys please take
it off list.
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: "D. Glenn Arthur Jr."
Subject: OT OT OT -- Re: Definitions WAS Re: London Bombing update
A soldier attacks the enemy and the enemy&#x
BOYS
Lets try and keep the peace around here.
Cory, three Hail Mary's and an Our Father for you.
This is the PDML, not the OTAML.
I feel responsible because I posted an update on the London angle -
please find your favourite news page for further updates.
So that's a cat'o'nine tails for m
- Original Message -
From: "mike wilson"
Subject: Re: Re: Definitions WAS Re: London Bombing update
From: Graywolf
Subject: Re: Definitions WAS Re: London Bombing update
I want to hear you say that after they have killed some of your family
and friends just be
- Original Message -
From: "Paul Stenquist"
Subject: Re: Definitions WAS Re: London Bombing update
I don't think it's Tom who doesn't have a clue. I only have to look at
where this comes from. A country that bears no responsibility for what
happens in th
hw"
Subject: Re: Definitions WAS Re: London Bombing update
Not really...
Terrorists attack seemingly indiscriminately, Russia, Israel, the
U.S., England, France, Spain...literally everywhere!
These people hate everyone. They are not partisans...think about it.
They are mad dogs and deserve to be shot
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: "keithw"
Subject: Re: Definitions WAS Re: London Bombing update
Not really...
Terrorists attack seemingly indiscriminately, Russia, Israel, the
U.S., England, France, Spain...literally everywhere!
These people hate ever
But it's not out of line for Bill to suggest that the terrorist attacks
are a reasoned response to UK and American policies? Nor is it out of
line to tell Tom that "he doesn't have a clue." My response was long
overdue, but it's all I have to say. You won't hear any more from me.
Paul
On Jul 13
that's *exactly* what i meant.
best,
mishka
On 7/13/05, Boris Liberman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> would say in Russian, "One who pays, orders the music"...
>
> I don't believe in randomness or arbitrarity in modern world...
>
> Again, like you said, this is just an observation, I am not try
l Stenquist" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Wednesday, July 13, 2005 6:33 AM
Subject: Re: Definitions WAS Re: London Bombing update
I don't think it's Tom who doesn't have a clue. I only have to look at
where this comes from. A country that bears no responsibility for wh
D. Glenn Arthur Jr. wrote:
Keith wrote:
Mishka wrote:
> the difference between "terrorists" and
> "freedom fighters" (or "partisans", "resistance",
> and so forth) has always been arbitrary.
>
> best,
> mishka
Not really...
Terrorists attack seemingly indiscriminately, Russia, Israel, the U
Paul Stenquist wrote:
I don't think it's Tom who doesn't have a clue. I only have to look at
where this comes from. A country that bears no responsibility for what
happens in the word. A country that is for all practical purposes a
protectorate of the United States. A country that regularly di
rages
the very nation they depend on for defense and almost everything else.
It's easy to look down from the ivory tower when you have no burden to
bear.
Paul
On Jul 12, 2005, at 11:59 PM, William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: "Graywolf"
Subject: Re: Definitions
Mishka wrote:
how about bombing shit out of a city (say, dresden) with conventional
bombs? how about "shock and awe"? why do we say, killing a few dozen
on a bus (or a few hundred in a business tower) is terrorism,
while killing same hundreds in an air strike is "collateral damage"?
how about kil
>
> From: Graywolf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2005/07/13 Wed AM 03:25:23 GMT
> To: pentax-discuss@pdml.net
> Subject: Re: Definitions WAS Re: London Bombing update
>
> I want to hear you say that after they have killed some of your family and
> friends just bec
>
> From: "cbwaters" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> Date: 2005/07/12 Tue PM 09:48:32 GMT
> To:
> Subject: OT: Definitions WAS Re: London Bombing update
>
> In my view Bob, a "freedom fighter" is more of a paramilitary figure. One
> who might bomb but
Depending on who writes the history books and dominant newspapers.
DagT
> fra: Mishka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> emne: Re: Definitions WAS Re: London Bombing update
>
> the difference between "terrorists" and
> "freedom fighters" (or "partisans&q
- Original Message -
From: "Graywolf"
Subject: Re: Definitions WAS Re: London Bombing update
I want to hear you say that after they have killed some of your family and
friends just because they happened to be where ever they were at the time.
Tom, you really haven'
how about bombing shit out of a city (say, dresden) with conventional
bombs? how about "shock and awe"? why do we say, killing a few dozen
on a bus (or a few hundred in a business tower) is terrorism,
while killing same hundreds in an air strike is "collateral damage"?
how about killing civilian co
On Wed, 13 Jul 2005 06:57:59 +0200, Boris Liberman wrote:
> [...] terms restrict the mindset of general population to a
> very specific boundaries...
Language constrains thought. That fact can be used against unwary
listeners. Many techniques of propaganda and advertising rely on this
effect.
Hi!
I am not argoing pro or against "these people". Their actions speak for
themselves.
All I am saying is that the labels has been applied to them, depending on who's
talking, pretty much indescriminately.
-- WWII partisans have been called "bandits" and "terrorists" in Europe recently
-- U
I am not argoing pro or against "these people". Their actions speak for
themselves.
All I am saying is that the labels has been applied to them, depending on who's
talking, pretty much indescriminately.
-- WWII partisans have been called "bandits" and "terrorists" in Europe recently
-- Ukrainian
-
William Robb wrote:
- Original Message - From: "keithw"
Subject: Re: Definitions WAS Re: London Bombing update
Not really...
Terrorists attack seemingly indiscriminately, Russia, Israel, the
U.S., England, France, Spain...literally everywhere!
These people hate everyone. They are
- Original Message -
From: "D. Glenn Arthur Jr."
Subject: OT OT OT -- Re: Definitions WAS Re: London Bombing update
A soldier attacks the enemy and the enemy's resources in an attempt
to destroy said enemy or force him to withdraw. Violence is directed
at accom
On Tue, 12 Jul 2005 22:46:05 -0400 (EDT), D. Glenn Arthur Jr. wrote:
> Yours for more precise speech,
Dear God, how would the press and politicians survive if that caught
on? :-)
TTYL, DougF KG4LMZ
- Original Message -
From: "keithw"
Subject: Re: Definitions WAS Re: London Bombing update
Not really...
Terrorists attack seemingly indiscriminately, Russia, Israel, the U.S.,
England, France, Spain...literally everywhere!
These people hate everyone. They are not
Keith wrote:
> Mishka wrote:
> > the difference between "terrorists" and
> > "freedom fighters" (or "partisans", "resistance",
> > and so forth) has always been arbitrary.
> >
> > best,
> > mishka
>
> Not really...
> Terrorists attack seemingly indiscriminately, Russia, Israel, the U.S.,
>
Mishka wrote:
> the difference between "terrorists" and
> "freedom fighters" (or "partisans", "resistance",
> and so forth) has always been arbitrary.
>
> best,
> mishka
Not really...
Terrorists attack seemingly indiscriminately, Russia, Israel, the U.S.,
England, France, Spain...literally every
the difference between "terrorists" and
"freedom fighters" (or "partisans", "resistance",
and so forth) has always been arbitrary.
best,
mishka
On 7/12/05, William Robb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> - Original Message -----
> Fro
- Original Message -
From: "cbwaters"
Subject: OT: Definitions WAS Re: London Bombing update
In my view Bob, a "freedom fighter" is more of a paramilitary figure. One
who might bomb but would hit a target with some military or strategic
value.
These ***kers b
In my view Bob, a "freedom fighter" is more of a paramilitary figure. One
who might bomb but would hit a target with some military or strategic value.
These ***kers bombed non-combatants on the subway/bus. Their action was
intended to cause chaos and suffering among the populace.
Whatever thei
92 matches
Mail list logo
