Re: All's quiet on the *ist front

2003-05-30 Thread Rob Studdert
On 29 May 2003 at 13:01, Robert Soames Wetmore wrote: > What gives - no interest in film bodies? Admittedly it will be positioned as a > lower-middle class (like me!) item, but is anyone else happy to see Pentax at > the technological lead in a price point for the first time since the PZ-1p? > A

Re: All's quiet on the *ist front

2003-05-30 Thread Roland Mabo
nterrested in getting one. I await the true MZ-5n/MZ-3 successor. I might get one as a replacement for my broken MZ-10, but I might as well get a MZ-6 at a low price. Best wishes Roland From: "Robert Soames Wetmore" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED] To: [EMAIL PROTECTE

All's quiet on the *ist front

2003-05-30 Thread Robert Soames Wetmore
It is a tribute to the importance of digital in Pentax's future that so little has been said on the list about the *ist (non-D, to be precise). Here we have a radically new camera design which is trickling out to magazines (how many read Herb Keppler's assessment?) and even into select stores.