G'day,
If anyone remembers me and is interested in what I've been doing for a
little while, photography-wise and to some extent writing-wise, have a
look at my photoblog:
http://davidavid.blogspot.com
Cheers,
David
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinf
Hey, you're addressing a uni student you know (-:
You want good build, buy limited and FA* lenses q-:
I'll take the cheaper, lighter, smaller option.
Cheers,
David
David Savage wrote:
> At 12:46 PM 21/09/2006, David Nelson wrote:
>> Wow. Pentax are really building a li
Wow. Pentax are really building a lineup with something for everyone I'd
say.
Wonder what the new DA and D FA primes will be like? Personally I'd hope
we're talking nice optics with... consumer build? for a low price.
Cheers,
David
Joseph Tainter wrote:
> http://www.digital.pentax.co.jp/ja/le
Looks like Samsung is having their own rebranded K10D
Samsung Camera Adds Step-Up Model to Growing DSLR Range with Launch of GX-10
http://www.thephotostation.net/modules.php?name=News&file=showarticle&threadid=25628
http://notifier.svmedia.com/pub/rjgr01-001/Email_Images/back3%20LR.jpg
http://not
> http://www.pentax.co.jp/japan/news/2006/press-image/200646-05.jpg
*swoons*
Purrrty, bit rich for my blood though I expect.
Plus there's this about the 645D if anyone's interested:
"This product will be continuously upgraded by incorporating newly
developed image sensors, with its final effec
David Savage wrote:
> Isn't it "Arr" as in "Arr me hearty"
Actually, there's Arr, Yarr and Harr, all with subtly different meanings
that wouldn't be evident to a landlubber.
(-:
David
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
Anemone.
ah neh meh nee.
Sorry, pet hate.
Nice colours, not sure about the big shadowy bit in the centre (which is
where is eye is drawn too). I need something there to look at but can't
find it.
Cheers,
David
David Mann wrote:
> Another flower pic with too little DOF ;)
>
> http://www.blu
http://picasaweb.google.com/hundrednaire/Pentax?authkey=Y2exq8ebUEWpMysKHGP2s6cVHOs
Post on the topic:
http://forums.dpreview.com/forums/readflat.asp?forum=1036&thread=19877019
--
PDML Pentax-Discuss Mail List
PDML@pdml.net
http://pdml.net/mailman/listinfo/pdml_pdml.net
"THIS is a bad dog: he was gnawing on a human corpse when I startled him."
http://www.michaelyon-online.com/wp/the-long-road-ahead.htm
Cheers,
David
Joseph Tainter wrote:
I meant to send this to the list. Mind not working this morning.
Joe
Original Message
Subject: Re: Fw:
Were you using the batteries in the battery grip by any chance? I've now
given up using batteries in the grip as I suspect there's a contact
problem somewhere along the line that leads to erratic battery performance.
Alternatively, do you trust your charger? I've had trouble there in the
past
Thanks Shel, I'm sure this will come in handy.
Cheers,
David
Shel Belinkoff wrote:
So, have you ever framed your DSLR pic just a scosh to tight, and wished
there was something you could do about it?
I've been using Thomas Knoll's Recover Edges utility for a few months, and
sometimes it's a lif
rez view.
A color rendering would be interesting to compare with, to see if color
adds anything significant to the composition.
Godfrey
On Apr 18, 2006, at 2:09 AM, David Nelson wrote:
I don't shoot much scenic stuff and don't do much B&W conversion, but
here's a pano that hap
Well-spotted - I don't like the flat effect that a lens-mounted ring
flash gives, so I just handheld it.
Cheers,
David
mike wilson wrote:
Ringflash not on the lens, though? The doughnuts would have been more
"central", rather then off to one side.
I don't shoot much scenic stuff and don't do much B&W conversion, but
here's a pano that happens to be both. Queenscliff Beach, the northern
end of Manly.
http://davidavid.whatsbeef.net/beachpano.jpg
Shot with the A24/2.8, stitched with Autostitch. I was surprised that
the moving waves didn't
e one Dave.
Dave S
On 4/17/06, David Nelson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Taken just a few minutes ago of a recent guest of mine.
http://davidavid.whatsbeef.net/huntsman.jpg
FA50/2.8 macro and with extension, f/22, ISO 800.
Any guesses as to what sort of flash I used? q-:
Comments appr
Taken just a few minutes ago of a recent guest of mine.
http://davidavid.whatsbeef.net/huntsman.jpg
FA50/2.8 macro and with extension, f/22, ISO 800.
Any guesses as to what sort of flash I used? q-:
Comments appreciated.
Cheers,
David
kus and Gonz. I was a big
fan of the eyes of this beastie too.
Cheers,
David
Kenneth Waller
- Original Message - From: "David Nelson"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: PESO - Tree Snake
Been a while since I posted a photo, and seeing as I took a heap in
the latest holid
Been a while since I posted a photo, and seeing as I took a heap in the
latest holidays, I thought some people might be interested to see a
Brown Tree Snake, Boiga irregularis, from the Top End.
http://davidavid.whatsbeef.net/boiga.jpg
Comments appreciated.
Cheers,
David
From dpreview news:
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0601/06011602samsunggx1s.asp
"It's been rumoured for weeks, leaked ahead of annoucement and now it's
here; Samsung's first digital SLR, and the first fruit of the Samsung /
Pentax tie-in announced in October. The GX-1S is a lightweight 6
megapix
Crikey Thrainn, that's a great collection of shots! Amazing skies in the
landscape shots, very stirring images. The birds are great, more than
just 'nice' bird photos; they are all quite special.
Very jealous,
David
Thrainn Vigfusson wrote:
I finally got around to subscribing to photo.net and
Yea yea yea yea yea!
Cheers,
David
Kenneth Waller wrote:
Check out http://mypeoplepc.com/members/kwaller/offwallphoto/id2.html
All comments solicited
Yeah, nay, and/or otherwise
What would you do differently?
Thanks in advance
Kenneth Waller
Thanks for the news, can we have a link to the booklet please?
Cheers,
David
Peter Fairweather wrote:
To all fellow LBA sufferers
On the USA Pentax site there is downloadable booklet on DA lenses
which has some details on the new fisheye
Here is a comparison with the old one
Fisheye Lens
In the recent windy period in Sydney, one of my Rosella plants was blown
over. I have since righted it and its peculiar response can be seen in
the following photo which I took a moment ago.
http://davidavid.whatsbeef.net/rosella.jpg
*ist D, FA50 macro @ f/2.8, ISO 400.
As usual, I'd apprecia
f thing in
the absence of alternatives (i.e. when I don't have or am not inclined
to set up my flash or tripod.
The suggestion to rotate it was a good one, it does look better that way.
Cheers,
David
Godfrey DiGiorgi wrote:
On Nov 9, 2005, at 5:23 PM, David Nelson wrote:
I'm curious to k
I'm curious to know if anybody likes this shot.
http://davidavid.whatsbeef.net/jumping.jpg
*ist D, ISO 800, FA50 macro @ f/4, 1/125, monopod.
Cheers,
David
m, I sure do like good pizza.
Shel
"You meet the nicest people with a Pentax"
[Original Message]
From: David Nelson
After all this talk of unappetising food, here's a photo of the lunch I
ate yesterday. I made it, thought it looked pretty good, so took a snap
of it. Bon a
After all this talk of unappetising food, here's a photo of the lunch I
ate yesterday. I made it, thought it looked pretty good, so took a snap
of it. Bon appétit.
http://davidavid.whatsbeef.net/pizza.jpg
*ist D, FA50 macro, 1/90 f/2.8, ISO 800
Comments appreciated.
Cheers,
David
Cool images Derby, that bright sky is freaky in some of the shots! The
bridge looks very 'sci-fi' from below like that.
Re: the scratch, we've all been told what a small effect a front element
scratch has on optics, but I agree, it's still always a bummer. Serves
you right for having such a ri
Pretty cool Rob, and thanks for the link to autostitch, I've been
playing with that since you started posting your panos.
This one doesn't seem as crisp as what I've come to expect from you.
Maybe better to make the output pano larger originally in AutoStitch
then resize it in photoshop?
Any
Saw a review of this gadget a while back:
http://www.kickstartnews.com/reviews/hardware/zigview_digital_angle_viewfinder.html
Cheers,
David
Rob Studdert wrote:
http://www.intro2020.co.uk/pages/zigview.htm
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT) +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTE
G'day g'day,
http://davidavid.whatsbeef.net/mantid2.jpg
frank theriault wrote:
Wonderful shot. Nat'l Geo quality, IMHO.
High praise indeed, thanks!
P. J. Alling wrote:
> Nice illustration quality. Mantids are scary, if you think about it.
> This one looks it.
Yeah they're certainly well d
http://davidavid.whatsbeef.net/mantid2.jpg
Just grabbed one of these (Snake Mantid, Kongobatha diademata) from the
garden and did some close-up shooting indoors. Q&D conversion, could be
better but it does the job.
Let me know what you think. It's been the first bit of real shooting
I've don
I do now:
http://www.sundog.clara.co.uk/atoptics/sunflat.htm
Cheers,
David
Rob Studdert wrote:
Does anyone know the technical reason that the sun renders as an ellipse when
shot close to the horizon?
TIA.
Rob Studdert
HURSTVILLE AUSTRALIA
Tel +61-2-9554-4110
UTC(GMT) +10 Hours
[EMAIL PROTE
Bizzare. Am I allowed to say I like the odd ones? (-:
Cheers,
David
Herb Chong wrote:
i was shooting yesterday in the Catskills and needed an in-between ND
filter of 4 stops because i only had my 6-stop B+W filter with me and
not my 3-stop one. since i carry a Hi-Tech 85mm square ND filter wit
I'm surprised no-one has commented on this already - to me the eyes of
the young guy look artificial. Like the whites and blacks have been
enhanced or something. His right eye (i.e. the one on the left) in
particular looks quite horrible to me.
Are my suspicions at all correct or am I imaginin
From: "Jostein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Has KonicaMinolta released any "digital-only" lenses, or is their
lineup strictly 35mm still?
Herb Chong wrote:
> three yesterday.
From the KM press release:
"2. Effective Anti-Shake compensation equivalent to a shutter speed 2 -
3 stops slower*1 with Dynax
I'm not crazy about the idea of IS, in body or lens based. Sure, it
would be useful for some situations, but it has its limitations from my
point of view. What I would *much* rather be able to do is push shutter
speed up by having better performance at high ISO. The advantages of
this over an e
Pål Jensen wrote:
another between 70 and 80.
Between 60 and 70 in fact.
Cheers,
David
Kostas Kavoussanakis wrote:
Tamron does a 180 Macro.
It's supposedly very good, but it's not made in Pentax mount alas.
Sigma's new 150mm macro is also supposedly very good but this isn't made
in Pentax mount either. I belive there are some sigma 180mm macros as
well, these are available in
Pentax *ist D with FA-J 18-35mm (-:
Well, okay I kinda tell a lie.
My dad was a pentax user - originally with a spotty, 50/1.4, 28/3.5 and
some tele-zoom. Then when that got stolen (containing baby photos of
me!) he got a K1000 and A 50/2 which I used once or twice, never
seriously though.
C
Joseph Tainter wrote:
> Does everyone agree with P. J. that such purple "bloom" (or whatever it
> is called) will be seen normally with any lens (emphasis) on a digital
> sensor? Even "digital" lenses will do this?
My experience suggests that different lenses do have differing amounts
of purple
Okay fellas, thanks for the tips - sounds like one should be a bit
suspicious of these guys. I'd hate for someone to have problems after
being told of the deal by me. Maybe the low price could even be due to
some sort of defect they're not telling us about (most of their stuff
isn't greatly com
Yo dudes,
Some nasty person decided to list an SMC PENTAX-A MACRO 1:2.8 100mm,
that famous lens that has been going for such crazy money recently...
for €390 BIN!
http://cgi.ebay.com.au/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=7526518253
Not an auction, so the "no eBay" rule doesn't apply here, right?
Yo dudes,
Some nasty person decided to list an SMC PENTAX-A MACRO 1:2.8 100mm,
that famous lens that has been going for such crazy money recently...
for €390 BIN!
http://cgi.ebay.com.au/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&item=7526518253
Not an auction, so the "no eBay" rule doesn't apply here, right?
An
I wrote:
IIRC the archegoniophores release their spores from the upper rather
than the lower surface.
Except of course they don't release spores at all, but rather sperm )-:
Cheers,
David
Damn! I forgot my pun that I'd been saving for such an occasion! Okay,
here it is.
See you elater,
David
Jostein wrote:
Marchantia polymorpha?
mike wilson wrote:
All male flowers. Females are much
smaller, star-shaped and closer to the ground.
They look like archegoniophores rather than antheridiophores to me,
though that's only going from aussie marchantiophytes. Here the
antheridiophores ar
Jens Bladt wrote:
There are cleaning kids available - with fluids and stuff.
'Ere Mister, gimme a quid and I'll clean yer sensor.
Cheers,
David
I can't find the roadmap diagram anymore, so no. 210? Why?
Nothing terribly significant but the FL range oval on the roadmap goes
deliberately past 200mm (the DA 50-200 stops obviously at 200).
http://www.tekade.de/news/html/pentax-roadmap.html
http://www.digital.pentax.co.jp/en/lens/roadmap.pdf
Kostas Kavoussanakis wrote:
> I believe a FF (35mm) 50-200/4 is on the cards.
You sure? I think the pentax roadmap didn't mention its speed or exact
focal length (just that it would be a "High-performance D FA Telephoto
zoom) - personally I'd expect it to be 50-210 f/2.8
Got any other sources?
Nice shot Rob, but you're making me feel even more cooped up (haven't
been out of the house for a few days - it's frantic finishing up
assignments and studying time). Interestingly I didn't notice the blown
highlights the first time I looked at it - they really aren't offensive.
On a punt (HAR!)
frank theriault wrote:
I found getting the focus right when the dof is so narrow, and the
wind is blowing the tulips about to be very frustrating.
"Whinge whinge whinge"!
I would have said 'welcome to my world' but I think I'll save that
comment for when you start shooting at 1:1 magnificatio
It's a nice pic... but what have the romans ever done for us?
All right, but apart from the sanitation, the medicine, education, wine,
public order, irrigation, roads, a fresh water system, and public
health, what have the Romans ever done for us?
(-:
David
Mark Roberts wrote:
You thought t
Found this an interesting read:
http://www.pinhole.cz/en/pinholecameras/dirkon_01.html
Spotted on the dpreview forums where there is talk of a digital version
expected in 2006.
Cheers,
David
I did something similar recently - though my problem was I couldn't find
a subject. Check it out:
.
Cheers,
David
Cotty wrote:
Had this is idea for a nice pic, and then apathy set it and it all went
down the pan. So I present for you
Thought Of Making A Picture But Then Couldn't B Arsed
Fred Widall wrote:
Canadian goose
(In the spirit of the tiny tumbling pebble that precedes the avalanche...)
"uh oh..."
aziness (-:)
Cheers,
David
P. J. Alling wrote:
You have so little stress you're in a coma, or maybe just asleep.
David Nelson wrote:
Yeah, that's the problem of course. Many of the question simply can't
be properly answered with a yes/no or agree/disagree choice.
Agreed. But I got a 0
Yeah, that's the problem of course. Many of the question simply can't
be properly answered with a yes/no or agree/disagree choice.
Agreed. But I got a 0% tension so my conclusion was that the test is
quite awesome.
Cheers,
David
G'day Derby,
Nice shots, these guys really do like modelling (-:
In case you were wondering, it's a nymph of the Snake Mantid, Kongobatha
diademata. Sometimes used to see these guys flying down corridors and
clinging to windows at school (-:
Cheers,
David
Derby Chang wrote:
It's a pretty day tod
Charming image Dave!
My only criticism is that I'd love the image to be larger!
Cheers,
David
David Mann wrote:
Hi all,
Now that I've done my new PAW site I might as well add something to it.
I'm pretty sure I've shown this one before but not as a PAW. I have
some new slides to scan but I don't h
Beautiful! The jet trail is a bit annoying but the photo is very strong
even with it. That golden reflection off the paving!
Cheers,
David
John Forbes wrote:
I like to build up a bit of anticipation before releasing the URL. :-)
http://www.johnpforbes.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/thames/_IGP0582.jpg
Joh
Congrats Mark!
Mark Cassino wrote:
> But I'm really blown away by being in proximity to
E.O. Wilson,
Yeah that's the really great bit! Might have to pick your brains about
how you go about your work at some stage as it's the sort of thing I
might try some day.
Cheers,
David
Yeah, well, what does Savage know anyway?
Heh, I wasn't going to be so explicit (-:
>>http://davidavid.whatsbeef.net/flannel.jpg
>>http://davidavid.whatsbeef.net/coppertail.jpg
frank theriault wrote:
Like 'em both.
Thanks cobber!
I rather like the muted, subdued
colours. Those colours, along with the lovely OOF stuff, give the
photo a rather ethereal, misty (without being soft) l
David Savage wrote:
The shot of the flowers could do with having the levels & contrast
tweaked a bit.
Yeah I can see what you mean, it's pretty subdued.
Nice stuff
Cheers!
David
G'day Pee Dee em ellers,
Went out today for a quick shoot hoping to catch something that I saw a
couple of years ago and would have made a great photo op. My other
motive was that I'm in denial about the cold months coming on. People
posting 'spring' images only reminds me that our season's end
G'day Brian,
Brian Walters wrote:
This photo was taken several years ago at Mungo National Park
*jealous*
http://members.ozemail.com.au/~sgap/photos/paw/mungo-paw.html
Nice moonscape (pun sadly intended)!
Cheers,
David
Good buy; mine got a workout yesterday shooting my brothers kitesurfing.
Sometimes I feel guilty for not using it enough...
Out of interest, how much for and where from?
Looking forward to seeing some of your results from it.
Cheers,
David
Derby Chang wrote:
Impulse buy yesterday. Picked up a SMC
John Whittingham wrote:
I've even
considered going for a 180 f/3.5 Macro
It seems like a very nice lens optically. Build I could live with. Lack
of a Pentax mount I couldn't (-:
Now Tamron's old adaptall 180/2.5 - well that would be another one to
drool over in an AF reincarnation.
Cheers,
Dav
G'day Shaun, good to hear from you! I'm sure you're having lots of fun
with your son.
Anyway, welcome back.
Cheers,
David
Shaun Canning wrote:
Hi All,
Long time...no chat! I hope you are all well and happy. I've had a forced
break away from the PDML to learn how to be a dad. Our little bloke is
Mark Roberts wrote:
Mishka <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I am also wondering how 31LTD stacks up to 35 or 28 AL FA?
I guess, the build is a lot better. But optically?
Well I have the 28 and Jens is looking into a possible 31 Ltd coming up
for sale for me so I may find out in the future.
I'll be gettin
David Chang-Sang wrote:
I know this has been asked before; but since I do not yet have a limited
lens, and I seem to have money to burn...
*cries*
q-:
David
Cool pic Mark! I've been trying to do some more high mag macro stuff
recently but keep getting frustrated with camera shake or lighting or
both. Anyway, you've done pretty well here! Love the patterns in the ice
as well as the cool critter (pun, sadly, intended). Next - balance one
on a snowfla
Am I right that manual focus and auto focus differ only in the way the
lens focusing ring is rotated? I think I am right :).
No, all Pentax lenses focus rings rotate the same direction
Rob, I read the comment the same way you did, initially, but then
realised that it wasn't the direction of focus
sage]
From: David Nelson
Posting for the sake of it more than for my happiness with the pic, but
eager to hear what other people think of it.
http://davidavid.whatsbeef.net/bootlace.jpg
Another BW conversion using channels, trying to bring out textures and
patterns. Did it work? Anyone want
It's also the hood that comes with the FA-J 18-35mm
David
William Robb wrote:
I found one of these in a box. It looks fairly new.
Lens hood #PH-RBL 67mm
What lens does it fit?
Thanks
William Robb
Posting for the sake of it more than for my happiness with the pic, but
eager to hear what other people think of it.
http://davidavid.whatsbeef.net/bootlace.jpg
Another BW conversion using channels, trying to bring out textures and
patterns. Did it work? Anyone want to see the original?
For the
Great Pic. I hate you.
q-:
David
Francis wrote:
Another boat pic
I was trying halfheartedly to frame the sunset when this friend of ours
sailed onto the scene.
From that point on I was franticly running up and down the beach
snapping away. :)
http://www.photosynth.ca/photo/f/water-on-fire.html
Blimey! Awesome shot! Looks like it's out of a CGI movie.
Cheers,
David
Francis wrote:
Good evening every one!
I developed my first batch of slides yesterday! (a hundred and fifty
dollars! @#^&% )
Here is one of the best ones (in my opinion).
http://www.photosynth.ca/photo/f/boat&sea-gulls.html
Ta
Rob Studdert wrote:
nice fast compact DA26/2 LTD would be just about perfect
as a normal.
Don't forget to add a few more specifications - as well as fast and
compact, let's ask for CHEAP, light, well built, sharp, contrasty and no
bokehmonsters... q-:
Unfortunately I can just see a very nice len
Good work for doing the test - I love seeing this sort of thing... one
thing I'll point out though is that it appears that focus wasn't equal
in the two tests. Take a look at the balcony rails second from the back
and you'll see the tak is sharper. The left-foreground bare plane tree
branches a
Rob Studdert opined:
I think the "B" camera is short for Butt-ugly
q-: I actually like it. I think they all look awesome, but do lean
towards B. I wonder though whether deciding which exterior is to be
produced should really be based on a poll of under-glass models.
Anything like handling, funct
In the mood of adapting musician jokes to photography, here's one that
doesn't entirely work:
Why are Pentax cameras so much smaller than Canons?
They aren't. Canon photographers just have tiny brains so their cameras
look bigger.
(As a viola player I get my fair share of viola jokes but the or
http://cgi.ebay.com.au/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&rd=1&item=3878957258&ssPageName=STRK:MEWN:IT
Luckily for me, not enough people did spot it (-:
Pretty good considering the last two A 28mm f/2s on the bay went for a
tad over $330 and $400...
If anyone in the US is interested in the body and/or fla
(resend)
http://cgi.ebay.com.au/ws/eBayISAPI.dll?ViewItem&rd=1&item=3878957258&ssPageName=STRK:MEWN:IT
Luckily for me, not enough people did spot it (-:
Pretty good considering the last two A 28mm f/2s on the bay went for a
tad over $330 and $400...
If anyone in the US is interested in the body and
Sorry frank, but it is spelt entomologist... Don't confuse us with those
language-loving etymologists.
Cheers,
David
frank theriault wrote:
I'm no entomologist,
My first clue came when I realized that most entymologists can spell
the word .
[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
1. How do you do exposure most of the time? Av or Tv or manual (doing it
yourself)?
Estimations:
40% Hyper program
30% Av
20% Tv
10% M
2. Do you shoot digital or film?
Digital.
3. If you shoot digital, have you changed how you do exposure since switching
from film?
I thin
List seems pretty bad-tempered tonight... I sent a message, then resent
it 20 mins later when it hadn't appeared. The resend appeared on the
archive, and an hour later, the original message (-:
Neither message has managed the perilous journey to my inbox though...
Cheers,
David
Sylwester Pietrzy
Took these today and was quite happy with the outing considering I only
shot around 20 shots before running home, afraid it was about to rain.
Anyway, nothing special, unless you count the BW one which I don't
generally do.
http://davidavid.whatsbeef.net/leaf.jpg
http://davidavid.whatsbeef.net/l
(resend)
Took these today and was quite happy with the outing considering I only
shot around 20 shots before running home, afraid it was about to rain.
Anyway, nothing special, unless you count the BW converted one which I
don't
generally do.
http://davidavid.whatsbeef.net/leaf.jpg
http://davidav
PESO = Photo Every So Often
PAW = Photo a Week
David Oswald wrote:
As a newcomer to the list, I've tried googling to find an answer to what
I'm sure is a really dumb question. What on earth does PESO mean?
...and while we're at it, PAW?
Already blushing...
Dave
Oh the HUMANITY!
Fire Rages Through Electronics Warehouse
And yep Frank, your memory has served you well. Well done not to call it
symbiosis as this category includes mutualism but also parasitism!
Cheers,
David
frank theriault wrote:
On Fri, 25 Feb 2005 10:30:40 +1100, David Nelson
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Spent a couple of sessions photograp
Are you shooting in adobe RGB? Try going Image -> Mode -> Convert to
profile then select sRGB as the destination before saving for web.
I could be wrong of course.
Cheers,
David
Tom C wrote:
I'm using Photoshop CS and have been using Photoshop since version 3,
though I'm no where near an expert.
Cool shot; I'm surprised you didn't get in close to the member and use
your fisheye... I suppose that would have dimished the parliament
buildings in the BG. Actually, ignore that comment, it's nice how it is.
Cheers,
David
frank theriault wrote:
Taken a few weeks ago, on my daytrip to Ottawa, C
Spent a couple of sessions photographing these guys after discovering
them at the local National Park. Very funky little critters. Yesterday
the breeze was a little strong for my liking but I managed to get fairly
close to the shot I was after. Let me know what you think.
http://davidavid.whats
lorer navigate to a folder full of
pefs, right click and select 'halfsize these' or whatever you typed in.
A command prompt will open up and you'll see first halfsize.exe working
at the conversion, then the move taking place. While the jpegs are
stamped with a new date of creation, EXIF dat
G'day,
Would anyone be interested if I were to put together a little page
detailing how I have fiddled around and made it so I can right click on
a folder full of *ist D raw files in explorer, select 'halfsize' and the
resultant jpegs are then moved to a folder of my choice for easy browsing?
Re
Well that got your attention didn't it?
It's the *ist DS Silver, identical functionally to the normal black *ist
DS. HAR!
http://www.dpreview.com/news/0502/05021306pentax_istdssilver.asp
Will a silver limited lens look good on it?
Is that all we're going to get this PMA?
Cheers,
David
G'day y'all,
Saw a mention of this on the pentax.de website, so went searching.
It's made by a company called UK-Germany and appears to be able to take
most moderately sized lenses (remember you're limited to autofocus
though!) - the DA 14, D-FA 100 and 50 macros plus the DA 18-55 all fit
as exa
1 - 100 of 199 matches
Mail list logo
