Re: [Pce] draft-fizgeer-pce-pcep-bfd-parameters

2023-03-31 Thread Reshad Rahman
Hi Dhruv, authors, I just took a look at the document. Some high-level comments: - The document name is bfd-parameters but the rest of the doc talks about S-BFD. Should the document be renamed fo sbfd-parameters?- The abstract mentions LSP parameters and S-BFD. In the intro, there's no mention o

[Pce] Re: WG Adoption of draft-fizgeer-pce-pcep-bfd-parameters-03

2025-01-06 Thread Reshad Rahman
Hi, My PCE exposure is a bit dated, so I can't really say anything about adoption. I took a look at the doc:- It's not clear to me why Min Tx Interval is in milliseconds in 4.3.2.2 (as opposed to microseconds as in RFC5880)- The base BFD doc (RFC5880) is in the reference list, but the S-BFD docu

Re: [Pce] WG adoption poll for draft-barth-pce-association-bidir-04

2018-04-13 Thread Reshad Rahman (rrahman)
Support. From: Pce on behalf of Jonathan Hardwick Date: Tuesday, April 10, 2018 at 10:04 AM To: "pce@ietf.org" , "draft-barth-pce-association-bi...@ietf.org" Cc: "pce-cha...@ietf.org" Subject: [Pce] WG adoption poll for draft-barth-pce-association-bidir-04 Dear PCE WG This is the start of