Re: [Pce] Murray Kucherawy's No Objection on draft-ietf-pce-pceps-tls13-03: (with COMMENT)

2024-01-04 Thread Orie Steele
tions > > known, the shepherd writeup says there's at least one (and it was easy), > and > > makes another "Yes" remark that I don't understand. > > Addressed in an earlier email. > > > Forwarding a comment from Orie Steele, incoming ART Area Direc

[Pce] Re: Orie Steele's No Objection on draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-vendor-10: (with COMMENT)

2024-11-18 Thread Orie Steele
also pointing to RFC2578, so I’ll wait for > conclusion on that part before submitting > > > > Regards, > > Samuel > > > > *From:* Orie Steele > *Sent:* Friday, November 15, 2024 3:42 PM > *To:* Samuel Sidor (ssidor) > *Cc:* The IESG ; > draft-ietf-pce-s

[Pce] Re: Orie Steele's No Objection on draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-vendor-10: (with COMMENT)

2024-11-15 Thread Orie Steele
find it and clarify which RFC is > describing them. > > I'm fine with moving it into document body (proposed draft version > attached). Please let me know if such change will work for you. I can > submit it then. > > Thanks a lot, > Samuel > > -Original Message

[Pce] Orie Steele's No Objection on draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-vendor-10: (with COMMENT)

2024-11-14 Thread Orie Steele via Datatracker
Orie Steele has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-vendor-10: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please