-Mensaje original-
De: internet-dra...@ietf.org
Enviado el: martes, 13 de febrero de 2024 20:22
Para: LUIS MIGUEL CONTRERAS MURILLO
; Fernando Agraz
; LUIS MIGUEL CONTRERAS MURILLO
; salvatore.spadaro
Asunto: New Version Notification for draft-contreras-pce-pam-02.txt
A new version of
regards
Luis
De: Dhruv Dhody
Enviado el: miércoles, 14 de febrero de 2024 5:42
Para: LUIS MIGUEL CONTRERAS MURILLO
CC: pce@ietf.org
Asunto: Re: [Pce] RV: New Version Notification for
draft-contreras-pce-pam-02.txt
H Luis, WG,
Did you consider defining a new METRIC Object-type (within the
Thanks Dhruv!
Noted, we will continue with the analysis, my expectation is to report the
progress at IETF 119 so I can provide more info about the analysis
Thanks again,
Luis
De: Dhruv Dhody
Enviado el: martes, 27 de febrero de 2024 6:17
Para: LUIS MIGUEL CONTRERAS MURILLO
CC: Dhruv Dhody
Hi all,
I also support the adoption of the document since it provides an interesting
feature.
I have a comment after reading it, for the PCE-initiated case. I think it would
be good to describe what should be the way in which the PCE should handle an
installed based of network elements where n
Dear PCE WG,
We have updated draft-contreras-pce-pam (*) considering the comments received
in both PCE and IPPM WGs during IETF 122. Some of the changes implemented are:
* Description of the interaction between PCE and TED for working with the
precision metrics
* Clarification of field
