[Pce] SR policy color in PCEP practical implementations?

2025-01-31 Thread Dmytro Shypovalov
Dear PCE experts, Apologies if this is off topic for this mailer list as my question is not about the standard per se but about vendor implementations. Currently there are 2 competing drafts to advertise SR policy color: 1) https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-pce-pcep-color-08 2) ht

[Pce] PCEP delegation and dual-PCE redundancy - too vendor-specific?

2025-06-25 Thread Dmytro Shypovalov
Dear PCE working group, I am working on a PCE for SR-TE and currently trying to implement dual-PCE redundancy. I prefer to follow the RFC and not implement any proprietary inter-PCE protocols unless absolutely necessary. PCEP has been so far not a very standard-friendly protocol in my opinion, be

[Pce] Re: PCEP delegation and dual-PCE redundancy - too vendor-specific?

2025-07-01 Thread Dmytro Shypovalov
gt; future implementations will not need to figure it out by doing interop > testing (like in your case). > > > > For any Cisco PCC specific issues/clarifications, you can reach to me > privately as well and I can try to explain or forward your question to > somebody who can help

[Pce] Re: PCEP delegation and dual-PCE redundancy - too vendor-specific?

2025-07-01 Thread Dmytro Shypovalov
res more complex logic on PCE (or synchronization between PCEs, e.g. > via state-sync > <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-state-sync/>) and/or > tweaking using timers. > > > > Regards, > > Samuel > > > > *From:* Dmytro Shypovalov > *Sent:

[Pce] Re: PCEP delegation and dual-PCE redundancy - too vendor-specific?

2025-07-01 Thread Dmytro Shypovalov
urs when the PCE reboot i.e. all PCEP session goes down and > depending of the configuration, some PCCs will removed their LSPs while > other one keep them up during a time sufficient for the PCE (or a new one) > to fire up again. > > Best Regards > > Olivier > Le 24/06/2025