Hi,
My PCE exposure is a bit dated, so I can't really say anything about adoption.
I took a look at the doc:- It's not clear to me why Min Tx Interval is in
milliseconds in 4.3.2.2 (as opposed to microseconds as in RFC5880)- The base
BFD doc (RFC5880) is in the reference list, but the S-BFD docu
Hi Authors,
In preparation for WG adoption on this draft, we'd like all authors and
contributors to confirm on the list that they are in compliance with IETF IPR
rules.
Please respond (copying the mailing list) to say one of:
- I am not aware of any IPR applicable to this draft that should be
I am not aware of any IPR applicable to this draft that should be disclosed in
accordance with IETF IPR rules.
Regards,
Marina
From: Andrew Stone (Nokia)
Sent: Tuesday, January 7, 2025 2:54:57 AM
To: pce@ietf.org ; pce-cha...@ietf.org ;
Orly Bachar ; Marina Fiz
Internet-Draft draft-ietf-pce-stateful-interdomain-06.txt is now available. It
is a work item of the Path Computation Element (PCE) WG of the IETF.
Title: PCEP Extension for Stateful Inter-Domain Tunnels
Authors: Olivier Dugeon
Julien Meuric
Young Lee
Da
Internet-Draft draft-ietf-pce-pcep-extension-pce-controller-sr-10.txt is now
available. It is a work item of the Path Computation Element (PCE) WG of the
IETF.
Title: PCE Communication Protocol (PCEP) Extensions for Using PCE as a
Central Controller (PCECC) for Segment Routing (SR) MPLS Segm
