[Pce] Secdir last call review of draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-policy-cp-18

2024-11-15 Thread Joseph Salowey via Datatracker
Reviewer: Joseph Salowey Review result: Ready I have reviewed this document as part of the security directorate's ongoing effort to review all IETF documents being processed by the IESG. These comments were written primarily for the benefit of the security area directors. Document editors and WG c

[Pce] Re: Orie Steele's No Objection on draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-vendor-10: (with COMMENT)

2024-11-15 Thread Orie Steele
> This document clarifies the Private Enterprise Numbers (PEN) as described in the IANA registry. > Different instances of the object MAY have different Enterprise Numbers. In order to clarify, I think you need to relate "Private Enterprise Numbers" to "Enterprise Numbers" and to the sentence:

[Pce] Re: Gunter Van de Velde's No Objection on draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-vendor-10: (with COMMENT)

2024-11-15 Thread Cheng Li
Hi Gunter, Thank you very much for your review and comments. Please see our reply inline. Thanks, Cheng -Original Message- From: Gunter Van de Velde via Datatracker Sent: Thursday, November 14, 2024 12:13 PM To: The IESG Cc: draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-ven...@ietf.org; pce-cha...@iet

[Pce] Re: John Scudder's Discuss on draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-vendor-10: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

2024-11-15 Thread Dhruv Dhody
Hi John, On Sat, Nov 16, 2024 at 12:25 AM John Scudder via Datatracker < nore...@ietf.org> wrote: > John Scudder has entered the following ballot position for > draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-vendor-10: Discuss > > When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all > email addre

[Pce] Re: Last Call: (Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) Extensions for Segment Routing (SR) Policy Candidate Paths) to Proposed S

2024-11-15 Thread Dhruv Dhody
Hi Ketan, On Sat, Nov 9, 2024 at 5:20 PM Ketan Talaulikar wrote: > Hi Dhruv/Authors, > > I have not yet seen any updates on these issues related to the IANA > section - I hope I have not missed anything. > > I would like to raise one other issue that was caught by Dan Romascanu > in his last-cal