[Pce] Re: Rtgdir early review of draft-ietf-pce-pcep-yang-25

2024-10-22 Thread Matthew Bocci (Nokia)
Hi Dhruv Thanks. Looks good to me. Best regards Matthew From: Dhruv Dhody Date: Saturday, 19 October 2024 at 12:31 To: Matthew Bocci (Nokia) Cc: rtg-...@ietf.org , draft-ietf-pce-pcep-yang@ietf.org , pce@ietf.org Subject: Re: Rtgdir early review of draft-ietf-pce-pcep-yang-25 CAUTION:

[Pce] Intdir telechat review of draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-vendor-09

2024-10-22 Thread Wassim Haddad via Datatracker
Reviewer: Wassim Haddad Review result: Ready Summary: IMHO, this draft is in good shape. It is clear and easy to read. Major issues: None Minor issues: None Proposal: It would be helpful for the reader if more explanation can be added to the following text in the “Security Considerations” secti

[Pce] Re: Adoption Poll for draft-peng-pce-stateful-pce-autobw-update

2024-10-22 Thread Udayasree Palle
Hi, Yes, support WG adoption of this draft (as a co-author). Thanks, Udayasree On Mon, Oct 7, 2024 at 11:05 AM wrote: > Hi all, > > This is an adoption poll for draft-peng-pce-stateful-pce-autobw-update. > Do you believe that this document [1] is a right foundation for a PCE WG > item? > Pleas

[Pce] PCE WG Agenda for IETF 121

2024-10-22 Thread Dhruv Dhody
Hi WG, The **draft** agenda for the PCE WG sessions during IETF 121 is posted - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/agenda-121-pce/ Please unicast us if there is any change needed. Please note that the allocated time includes time for Q&A. Please use the mailing list to bring out the key point that