Hi Roman,
Thanks for taking the responsible AD role for this I-D.
On Fri, Sep 20, 2024 at 7:56 PM Roman Danyliw wrote:
>
> Hi!
>
> I performed an AD review of draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-vendor-07. To
> help load balance AD document queues, I'll be taking over as responsible AD.
>
> Thanks for
Hi PCE'rs,
This WGLC has ended. Thank you to the WG for the useful feedback; thank
you to the authors for resolving the comments and updating the I-D
accordingly. I'll now proceed with the shepherd review.
Thanks,
Julien
On 06/09/2024 14:23:58 julien.meu...@orange.com wrote:
Hi all,
Sinc
Hi Druhv!
Thanks for the follow-up.
From: Dhruv Dhody
Sent: Monday, September 23, 2024 5:45 AM
To: Roman Danyliw
Cc: pce@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Pce] AD Review of draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-policy-cp-17
Warning: External Sender - do not click links or open attachments unless you
recognize
Hi Roman,
On Mon, Sep 23, 2024 at 5:36 PM Roman Danyliw wrote:
> Hi Druhv!
>
>
>
> Thanks for the follow-up.
>
>
>
> *From:* Dhruv Dhody
> *Sent:* Monday, September 23, 2024 5:45 AM
> *To:* Roman Danyliw
> *Cc:* pce@ietf.org
> *Subject:* Re: [Pce] AD Review of
> draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-
Hi Quan，
PSID(Path Segment ID) was defined in RFC9545 originally, and introduced in SRv6
draft, so it can apply to SR-MPLS and SRv6.
Reusing P flag in LSP is better to me, make it as general, indicating PSID
allocation request, no matter where the Path Segment TLV will be encoded.
My 2cents,
C
Hi Roman,
Thanks for taking on the AD role for this I-D.
On Sat, Sep 21, 2024 at 12:35 AM Roman Danyliw wrote:
> Hi!
>
> I performed an AD review of draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-policy-cp-17.
> To help load-balance AD documents queues, I am assuming the role of
> responsible AD.
>
> Thanks fo
Internet-Draft draft-ietf-pce-iana-update-02.txt is now available. It is a
work item of the Path Computation Element (PCE) WG of the IETF.
Title: Update to the IANA PCE Communication Protocol (PCEP) Registration
Procedures and Allowing Experimental Error Codes
Authors: Dhruv Dhody
