[Pce] I-D Action: draft-ietf-pce-pcep-extension-native-ip-32.txt

Internet-Draft draft-ietf-pce-pcep-extension-native-ip-32.txt is now available. It is a work item of the Path Computation Element (PCE) WG of the IETF. Title: Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) Extensions for Native IP Networks Authors: Aijun Wang Boris Kha

[Pce] 答复: AD review of draft-ietf-pce-pcep-extension-native-ip-30

Hi, John: I have uploaded the updated version at https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-pce-pcep-extension-native-ip-32 and wish it address all your concerns. If there is no more comments, we can put forward it to the IESG LC review then. Thanks in advance for your efforts! So

[Pce] PCE rejected e-mail

" Delivery has failed to these recipients or groups: pce@ietf.org Your message wasn't delivered because the recipient's email provider rejected it. " Gee thanks, IETF. Looks like the authors got it so perhaps they can respond to list and get us back in sync If I had a reason for the rejection

[Pce] Re: PCE rejected e-mail

Hi, Tom. I’ve moved PCE to the bcc and put supp...@ietf.org in the to; they are the right people to ask for help with the rejection. I expect they will want a copy of the message with full headers to troubleshoot, please consider following up to them with that info (and

[Pce] Last Call: (Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) Extensions for Native IP Networks) to Experimental RFC

The IESG has received a request from the Path Computation Element WG (pce) to consider the following document: - 'Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) Extensions for Native IP Networks' as Experimental RFC The IESG plans to make a decision in the next few weeks, and solici

[Pce] RFC 9603 on Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) Extensions for IPv6 Segment Routing

A new Request for Comments is now available in online RFC libraries. RFC 9603 Title: Path Computation Element Communication Protocol (PCEP) Extensions for IPv6 Segment Routing Author: C. Li, Ed., P. Kaladharan,

[Pce] PCE WG minutes for IETF 120

Hi WG, Please find the minutes for PCE WG session https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/120/materials/minutes-120-pce-202407252200-01 Thanks to those who contributed to the minutes. Please reach out to pce-cha...@ietf.org in case any correction needs to be made. Tha

[Pce] Re: 答复: New draft to update IANA registration policy

Hi Tom, On Sat, Jul 27, 2024 at 5:03 AM tom petch wrote: > Where it says > 'This updates > | Wavelength| [RFC8780] | | > | Restriction || | > | Constraint TLV | | | > | Action Values ' > Is this the > "Wavelength Restriction TLV Action Values" subregistry ] >

[Pce] Re: PCE WG minutes for IETF 120

Thanks Andrew for taking care of the minutes! A few minor editorial changes were made - https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/minutes-120-pce-202407252200/ Thanks! Dhruv On Mon, Jul 29, 2024 at 3:08 PM Andrew Stone (Nokia) wrote: > Hi WG, > > > > Please find the minutes for PCE WG session > https:/

[Pce] Re: 答复: AD review of draft-ietf-pce-pcep-extension-native-ip-30

Hi Aijun, Thanks for making these changes. I did a review of https://author-tools.ietf.org/iddiff?url1=draft-ietf-pce-pcep-extension-native-ip-30&url2=draft-ietf-pce-pcep-extension-native-ip-32&difftype=--html A few things to consider alongside any other IETF LC comments - - Section 3, we have