Re: [Pce] Adoption Poll for draft-dhodylee-pce-pcep-ls

This is an important extension, and the content is well written, I support the adoption. Hope more people can work on it more critical when it becomes an WG draft. Thanks, Cheng -Original Message- From: Pce On Behalf Of Pengshuping (Peng Shuping) Sent: Friday, April 12, 2024 9:23 AM T

[Pce] I-D Action: draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-optional-09.txt

Internet-Draft draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-optional-09.txt is now available. It is a work item of the Path Computation Element (PCE) WG of the IETF. Title: Extension for Stateful PCE to allow Optional Processing of PCE Communication Protocol (PCEP) Objects Authors: Cheng Li Ha

Re: [Pce] WGLC for draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-optional-07

Hi Shaofu, Sorry for my delay. Yes, you are correct! We have updated the draft to fix this typo. Thank you so much! Cheng https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-optional/ There is also an HTMLized version available at: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf

Re: [Pce] Shepherd review of draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-optional

Thank you Dhruv, the update looks good to me. We have updated the draft already! https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-optional/ There is also an HTMLized version available at: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-optional-09 A diff from

[Pce] Publication has been requested for draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-optional-09

Dhruv Dhody has requested publication of draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-optional-09 as None on behalf of the PCE working group. Please verify the document's state at https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-optional/ ___ Pce mailing