Hi Andrew,
- I am not aware of any IPR applicable to this draft that should be
disclosed in accordance with IETF IPR rules
Thanks
Daniele
Il Ven 5 Apr 2024, 17:14 Andrew Stone (Nokia) ha
scritto:
> Hi Authors,
>
> In preparation for WG adoption on this draft, we'd like all authors and
> contri
Hi Andrew,
- I am not aware of any IPR applicable to this draft that should be disclosed
in accordance with IETF IPR rules
BR,
Shuping
From: Daniele Ceccarelli [mailto:daniele.i...@gmail.com]
Sent: Monday, April 8, 2024 3:33 PM
To: Andrew Stone (Nokia)
Cc: Dhruv Dhody ; Pengshuping (Peng Shupi
Hi Andrew,
I am not aware of any IPR applicable to this draft that should be disclosed in
accordance with IETF IPR rules
Thanks,
Cheng
From: Pengshuping (Peng Shuping)
Sent: Monday, April 8, 2024 9:35 AM
To: Daniele Ceccarelli ; Andrew Stone (Nokia)
Cc: Dhruv Dhody ; younglee...@gmail.com;
Hi Andrew,
I am not aware of any IPR applicable to this draft that should be disclosed
in accordance with IETF IPR rules.
Thanks!
Dhruv
On Fri, Apr 5, 2024 at 8:44 PM Andrew Stone (Nokia)
wrote:
> Hi Authors,
>
> In preparation for WG adoption on this draft, we'd like all authors and
> contrib
Hi Andrew,
I am not aware of any IPR applicable to this draft that should be disclosed in
accordance with IETF IPR rules.
Aijun Wang
China Telecom
> On Apr 5, 2024, at 23:14, Andrew Stone (Nokia) wrote:
>
>
> Hi Authors,
> In preparation for WG adoption on this draft, we'd like all author
Hi Andrew
I am not aware of any undisclosed IPRs.
Thank you
Gyan
On Fri, Apr 5, 2024 at 5:14 PM Andrew Stone (Nokia) wrote:
> Hi Authors,
>
> In preparation for WG adoption on this draft, we'd like all authors and
> contributors to confirm on the list that they are in compliance with IETF
> I
Hello Authors/All,
I've reviewed the draft from the perspective of consistency with the SR
Policy Arch RFC9256 as well as the BGP SR Policy SAFI IDR draft. As such, I
find some issues that I think need to be addressed before publication.
Note that these may seem editorial (no change needed in PCE
Hi Dhruv,
I've also posted my review of the document from the POV of consistency with
SR Policy Arch and BGP SR Policy SAFI documents
https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/pce/xExbrHXRsC66fGUdy5wtvQlbXc4/
I hope these help improve the document by providing a better overall
context of these very
Hi Ketan, Authors,
I am just responding to a few comments as a Shepherd. Please work with each
other and let's resolve these comments
On Mon, Apr 8, 2024 at 5:15 PM Ketan Talaulikar
wrote:
> Hello Authors/All,
>
> I've reviewed the draft from the perspective of consistency with the SR
> Pol
Hi Andrew,
I am not aware of any IPR applicable to this draft that should be disclosed
in accordance with IETF IPR rules.
Thanks!
On Mon, Apr 8, 2024 at 7:12 AM Gyan Mishra wrote:
> Hi Andrew
>
> I am not aware of any undisclosed IPRs.
>
> Thank you
>
> Gyan
>
> On Fri, Apr 5, 2024 at 5:14 PM
Hi Dhruv,
Please check inline for responses/clarifications with KT.
On Mon, Apr 8, 2024 at 7:54 PM Dhruv Dhody wrote:
> Hi Ketan, Authors,
>
> I am just responding to a few comments as a Shepherd. Please work with
> each other and let's resolve these comments
>
> On Mon, Apr 8, 2024 at 5:1
Hi Ketan,
Jumping directly to...
>
>> 15 draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-policy-cp-15
>>>
>>> 17 Abstract
>>>
>>> 19 Segment Routing (SR) allows a node to steer a packet flow along any
>>> 20 path. SR Policy is an ordered list of segments (i.e., instructions)
>>> 21 that repres
Internet-Draft draft-ietf-pce-multipath-11.txt is now available. It is a work
item of the Path Computation Element (PCE) WG of the IETF.
Title: PCEP Extensions for Signaling Multipath Information
Authors: Mike Koldychev
Siva Sivabalan
Tarek Saad
Vishnu P
Andrew,
I am not aware of any IPR applicable to this draft that should be disclosed
in accordance with IETF IPR rules.
Thank you.
Young
On Mon, Apr 8, 2024 at 6:12 AM Gyan Mishra wrote:
> Hi Andrew
>
> I am not aware of any undisclosed IPRs.
>
> Thank you
>
> Gyan
>
> On Fri, Apr 5, 2024 at 5:
14 matches
Mail list logo
