Oh no! It seems like this email is missing over the email sea.
Crazy busy weeks before IETF Meeting.
Yes, I support the publication of this draft as one of the author. Will
response to the comments ASAP after the IETF119 meeting.;
Thanks,
Cheng
From: Dhruv Dhody
Sent: Wednesday, February 21,
Hi WG,
I have read the document and think it is ready for publication, thanks.
Best wishes,
Haomian (as co-author)
From: Dhruv Dhody [mailto:d...@dhruvdhody.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2024 5:33 PM
To: pce@ietf.org
Cc: pce-chairs ;
draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-optio...@ietf.org
Subject: W
Hi authors of this draft,
I support this draft, but I still have a few minor comments:
1.Introduction section:
* “Generalzied MPLS (GMPLS) tunnels.” -> typo
* “…allow a PCC to specify in a Path Computation Request (PCReq) message
(sent to a PCE) whether the object must be taken into acc
Hi Working Group,
I have read this document and consider it is ready to be published.
Thanks!
B.R.
Chaode
发件人: Dhruv Dhody [mailto:d...@dhruvdhody.com]
发送时间: 2024年2月21日 17:33
收件人: pce@ietf.org
抄送: pce-chairs ;
draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-optio...@ietf.org
主题: WGLC for draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pc
Hi Shaofu,
Many thanks for your supports and comments.
Please see our reply below.
Thanks,
Cheng
On Fri, Mar 1, 2024 at 12:25 PM
mailto:peng.sha...@zte.com.cn>> wrote:
Hi Chairs, WG,
I have read this document and find it is useful and support its forwarding.
Please see some comments a
Hi Samuel,
Many thanks for your quick review and support,.
Please see our reply below.
BTW, we post the proposed update to address your comments and Shaofu’s comments
in Github: https://github.com/muzixing/draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-optional
Thanks,
Cheng
From: Samuel Sidor (ssidor)
Sent:
Hi WG,
I have read the latest version of draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-optional-07 and I
think it is ready for publication.
So I support the last call of it.
Thanks,
Ka
From: Dhruv Dhody [mailto:d...@dhruvdhody.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2024 5:33 PM
To: pce@ietf.org
Cc: pce-chairs ;
dr
