Re: [Pce] WG Adoption of draft-peng-pce-entropy-label-position-10

Hi Andrew, Thanks for your detailed review and suggestions! Much appreciated! Please see in line with [Quan]. - Is there any value in having a reference to draft-ietf-idr-bgp-srmpls-elp-00? From the read I don't see any other purpose than "this is also ongoing" and can likely be removed? [Qua

Re: [Pce] WG Adoption of draft-peng-pce-entropy-label-position-10

Hi WG, I have reviewed the document and there is no objection for WG adoption. Please find some editing comments for authors' reference as below. Best Xuesong --- 1. Introduction ...This document proposes a set of extensions for PCEP to configure the ELP information for SR- MPLS networks.

[Pce] I-D Action: draft-ietf-pce-pcep-extension-pce-controller-srv6-02.txt

Internet-Draft draft-ietf-pce-pcep-extension-pce-controller-srv6-02.txt is now available. It is a work item of the Path Computation Element (PCE) WG of the IETF. Title: PCE Communication Protocol (PCEP) Extensions for Using the PCE as a Central Controller (PCECC) for Segment Routing over IPv

Re: [Pce] WG Adoption of draft-peng-pce-entropy-label-position-10

Hi Xuesong, Thanks for your support and comments! Much appreciated! Please see inline with [Quan]. 1. Introduction ...This document proposes a set of extensions for PCEP to configure the ELP information for SR- MPLS networks. " "ELP information" is mentioned here without clear definition (alt