Re: [Pce] WG Last Call on draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-auto-bandwidth

Hi, This LC has ended, without pointed out issue. We will then move to shepherd review. Thanks, Julien On 13/12/2018 14:29, Julien Meuric wrote: > Hi all, > > This e-mail starts a 3-week PCE WG Last Call on > draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-auto-bandwidth-08. Please share your reviews > and commen

Re: [Pce] Martin Vigoureux's No Objection on draft-ietf-pce-segment-routing-14: (with COMMENT)

Hi Jeff, You're right. I certainly don't want to change the specification, nor to add another ambiguity. I was just looking for a mnemonic to mitigate the confusion pointed out by Martin, to be considered between bracket (leaving the definition as is). Would "limit-blind" make sense? Cheers, Jul

Re: [Pce] Fwd: PCE-BSID Question to the List

Hi Jeff, I think this extension is important. Please see my reply inline. Thanks, Zhibo From: Pce [mailto:pce-boun...@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Jeff Tantsura Sent: Wednesday, November 07, 2018 10:19 AM To: pce@ietf.org Subject: [Pce] Fwd: PCE-BSID Question to the List Dear PC

Re: [Pce] Fwd: PCE-BSID Question to the List

Hi Zhibo, Thanks for the input, I like the encoding proposed by you. I will discuss this with my co-authors; IMHO any existing implementation would require to be change when code-point is allocated so a change of format of the TLV should not be a deal breaker for any implementation out in the f