Re: [Pce] Building the PCE Agenda for IETF 98

2017-02-28 Thread daniel
Hi Chairs, Re: We are currently looking to assign a shepherd and advance the document to the IESG. I would be happy to Shepherd the document, if you still need a volunteer. BR, Dan. From: Diego R. Lopez [mailto:diego.r.lo...@telefonica.com] Sent: 28 February 2017 01:56 To: Jo

Re: [Pce] draft-ietf-pce-pce-initiated-lsp

2017-02-28 Thread Jonathan Hardwick
Hi all I would like to get this thread closed down ASAP. Let me summarize where I think we have got to. 1. Robert has clarified the allowed PCC behaviour in the attached email. 2. I agree that Aaron's proposal would be useful to some implementations but I don't see it as essential. 3. Julien (w

Re: [Pce] Building the PCE Agenda for IETF 98

2017-02-28 Thread Adrian Farrel
> I’d like to make a request regarding the PCEP over TLS (a.k.a. PCEPS) draft, > asking the > chairs to make a statement on why this document progress has been blocked for > > such a long time and, in any case, to open a discussion about its final fate > and the > reasons for it. https://data

[Pce] I-D Action: draft-ietf-pce-stateful-sync-optimizations-09.txt

2017-02-28 Thread internet-drafts
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Path Computation Element of the IETF. Title : Optimizations of Label Switched Path State Synchronization Procedures for a Stateful PCE Authors : Edwa