-pce-stateful-pce-optio...@ietf.org; d...@dhruvdhody.com
Subject: Re: [Pce] WGLC for draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-optional-07
Hi Cheng,
Thanks for your response.
For the objects of intended-attribute-list and actual-attribute-list, I didn't
treat them as mandatory ones. But just think
CE => PCC ?
Regards,
PSF
Original
From: ChengLi
To: 彭少富10053815;
Cc: pce@ietf.org ;pce-cha...@ietf.org
;draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-optio...@ietf.org
;Dhruv Dhody
;
Date: 2024年03月13日 11:35
Subject: RE: [Pce] WGLC for draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-optional-07
Hi Shaofu,
Many thank
Thank you Chairs! We will update the draft according to the discussion in the
Mailing list and post it when the window is reopen.
Best Regards,
Cheng
From: Dhruv Dhody
Sent: Saturday, March 16, 2024 10:22 PM
To: pce@ietf.org
Cc: pce-chairs ;
draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-optio...@ietf.org
Subje
@ietf.org>; Dhruv Dhody
mailto:d...@dhruvdhody.com>>
Subject: RE: [Pce] WGLC for draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-optional-07
Hi Samuel,
Many thanks for your quick review and support,.
Please see our reply below.
BTW, we post the proposed update to address your comments and Shaofu’s comments
in Githu
Hi WG,
The WGLC is closed. Thanks for everyone's comments and feedback. The I-D is
on agenda for IETF 119 to discuss the resolution for comments received.
The authors should update the draft based on the comment received and we
will take the draft forward.
Thanks!
Dhruv & Julien
On Thu, Mar 7,
eng Li
> *Sent:* Wednesday, March 13, 2024 4:46 AM
> *To:* Samuel Sidor (ssidor) ;
> draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-optio...@ietf.org
> *Cc:* pce-chairs ; pce@ietf.org; Dhruv Dhody <
> d...@dhruvdhody.com>
> *Subject:* RE: [Pce] WGLC for draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-optional-
Hi All,
I have read the latest version and support the publication of this
draft.
Best regards
Xinxin Yi
Re: [Pce] WGLC for draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-optional-07
Dhruv Dhody Thu, 07 March 2024 10:22 UTCShow
header<https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/pce/?q=draft-ietf-
Hi folks,
I support the WG LC of this document and think it ready for publication.
Best regards
Chongfeng
From: Dhruv Dhody
Date: 2024-02-21 17:32
To: pce@ietf.org
CC: pce-chairs; draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-optio...@ietf.org
Subject: WGLC for draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-optional-07
Hi WG,
Th
Hi All,I read the latest version and support the publication of this
draft.
Best Regards,Shengnan Yue
-- Forwarded message -From: Pce On
Behalf Of Dhruv Dhody
Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2024 5:33 PM
To: pce@ietf.org
Cc: pce-chairs
draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-optio...@
Cc: pce-chairs ; pce@ietf.org; Dhruv Dhody
Subject: RE: [Pce] WGLC for draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-optional-07
Hi Samuel,
Many thanks for your quick review and support,.
Please see our reply below.
BTW, we post the proposed update to address your comments and Shaofu’s comments
in Github
Hi WG,
I have read the draft and support its publication. It is a simple and useful
extension.
Thanks,
Hang
From: Pce On Behalf Of Dhruv Dhody
Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2024 5:33 PM
To: pce@ietf.org
Cc: pce-chairs ;
draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-optio...@ietf.org
Subject: [Pce] WGLC for draf
Hi WG,
I have read through this draft. The extensions are simple and efficient. I
support that it is ready to be published.
Cheers,
Mao
发件人: Dhruv Dhody
发送时间: 2024年2月21日 17:33
收件人: pce@ietf.org
抄送: pce-chairs ;
draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-optio...@ietf.org
主题: WGLC for draft-ietf-pce-statef
Hi WG,
I have read the latest version of draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-optional-07 and I
think it is ready for publication.
So I support the last call of it.
Thanks,
Ka
From: Dhruv Dhody [mailto:d...@dhruvdhody.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2024 5:33 PM
To: pce@ietf.org
Cc: pce-chairs ;
dr
: Tuesday, March 12, 2024 11:00 PM
To: draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-optio...@ietf.org
Cc: pce-chairs ; pce@ietf.org; Dhruv Dhody
Subject: RE: [Pce] WGLC for draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-optional-07
Hi authors of this draft,
I support this draft, but I still have a few minor comments:
1
Hi Shaofu,
Many thanks for your supports and comments.
Please see our reply below.
Thanks,
Cheng
On Fri, Mar 1, 2024 at 12:25 PM
mailto:peng.sha...@zte.com.cn>> wrote:
Hi Chairs, WG,
I have read this document and find it is useful and support its forwarding.
Please see some comments a
Hi authors of this draft,
I support this draft, but I still have a few minor comments:
1.Introduction section:
* “Generalzied MPLS (GMPLS) tunnels.” -> typo
* “…allow a PCC to specify in a Path Computation Request (PCReq) message
(sent to a PCE) whether the object must be taken into acc
Hi WG,
I have read the document and think it is ready for publication, thanks.
Best wishes,
Haomian (as co-author)
From: Dhruv Dhody [mailto:d...@dhruvdhody.com]
Sent: Wednesday, February 21, 2024 5:33 PM
To: pce@ietf.org
Cc: pce-chairs ;
draft-ietf-pce-stateful-pce-optio...@ietf.org
Subject: W
Oh no! It seems like this email is missing over the email sea.
Crazy busy weeks before IETF Meeting.
Yes, I support the publication of this draft as one of the author. Will
response to the comments ASAP after the IETF119 meeting.;
Thanks,
Cheng
From: Dhruv Dhody
Sent: Wednesday, February 21,
Hi WG,
Considering this is a busy time just before the IETF meeting, we are
extending the WGLC for a week. Please respond by Thursday March 14th. It is
important to be explicitly vocal during the last call and we request you to
please respond to this thread.
Thanks!
Dhruv
On Wed, Feb 21, 2024 at
Hi Chairs, WG,
I have read this document and find it is useful and support its forwarding.
Please see some comments as below:
[1]
In section 3.1. STATEFUL-PCE-CAPABILITY TLV, it said that
"When the PCEP session is established, a PCC sends an Open message with an OPEN
object that contains the S
20 matches
Mail list logo
