Hi WG,
The adoption call is concluded and we have a new WG I-D. Thanks to
those who provided
feedback and comments.
Authors,
Please post a -00 version with no content change. Please handle comments
received in -01.
Thanks!
Dhruv & Julien
On Fri, Jan 26, 2024 at 10:19 PM Dhruv Dhody wrote:
>
...@ietf.org; pce@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Pce] WG Adoption of draft-peng-pce-entropy-label-position-10
Hi Samuel,
Thanks for your reply!
I am glad that most of your comments are addressed.
The reason why I use the "SHOULD" is that "MUST" may be too strong which
mentioned by
e-entropy-label-posit...@ietf.org
;pce@ietf.org ;
Date: 2024年02月20日 17:08
Subject: RE: [Pce] WG Adoption of draft-peng-pce-entropy-label-position-10
Thanks Quan,
Ack, I’m fine with your proposals + see inline (I skipped most of them as
you already responded and there was not much to discuss
...@dhruvdhody.com;
draft-peng-pce-entropy-label-posit...@ietf.org; pce@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [Pce] WG Adoption of draft-peng-pce-entropy-label-position-10
Hi Samuel,
Thanks for your detailed review and comments! Sorry for the delay due to the
holiday.LoL. Happy Chinese New Year!
Please see
n next version.
Best Regards,
Quan
Original
From: SamuelSidor(ssidor)
To: 熊泉00091065;
Cc: pce-chairs ;Dhruv Dhody
;draft-peng-pce-entropy-label-posit...@ietf.org
;pce@ietf.org ;
Date: 2024年02月07日 18:38
Subject: RE: [Pce] WG Adoption of draft-peng-pce-entropy-label-position-10
Hi Quan an
Hi all,I read the draft and support its adoption, I thing it is very important to be able to provide EL via PCEP from a PCE. Due to the importance of EL itself. SY,Boris 26.01.2024, 19:50, "Dhruv Dhody" :Hi WG,This email begins the WG adoption poll for draft-peng-pce-entropy-label-position-10https:
Hi Quan and PCE WG,
I support adoption of this draft with a few minor/not blocking comments (I
reviewed v11 as a lot of comments were addressed, so to avoid commenting same
thing again even if v10 is being adoption).
Abstract:
“…Label Indicator (ELI)/EL pairs SHOULD be inserted in the SR-MPLS l
Hi WG,
Thanks for the review, suggestions and comments from Andrew Stone, Xuesong Geng,
Ran Chen, Gyan Mishra and Weiqiang Cheng. Much appreciated!
I have updated a new version and try to resolve all the comments based on the
mailing list.
Hope this version would be better for you.Thanks!
A
on
;
Date: 2024年02月06日 17:26
Subject: Re: [Pce] WG Adoption of draft-peng-pce-entropy-label-position-10
Hi,
I've reviewed the draft and I support the adoption. This draft proposes a set
of extensions for PCEP to configure the ELP information for SR-MPLS networks.
It can effectively
Hi,
I've reviewed the draft and I support the adoption. This draft proposes a set
of extensions for PCEP to configure the ELP information for SR-MPLS networks.
It can effectively promote the application of entropy label in centralized
control scenarios.
Here I have some minor comments for the
ards,
Quan
Original
From: GyanMishra
To: 熊泉00091065;
Cc: d...@dhruvdhody.com
;draft-peng-pce-entropy-label-posit...@ietf.org
;pce@ietf.org
;pce-cha...@ietf.org ;
Date: 2024年02月06日 12:59
Subject: Re: [Pce] WG Adoption of draft-peng-pce-entropy-label-position-10
Hi Quan
RFC 8662 talks
Hi WG,
I support the adoption of this document as a co-author. The mechanism is
concise but useful to meet practical requirements of segment routing with ECMP,
especially used in the case of inter-domain SR policy.
Regards,
PSF
Original
From: DhruvDhody
To: pce@ietf.org ;
Cc: pce-chairs
rg <
> draft-peng-pce-entropy-label-posit...@ietf.org>;pce@ietf.org
> ;pce-chairs
> ;
> *Date: *2024年02月06日 11:12
> *Subject: **Re: [Pce] WG Adoption of
> draft-peng-pce-entropy-label-position-10*
>
> I reviewed the draft and support WG adoption.
>
> I believe th
our concern.
Thanks!
Best Regards,
Quan
Original
From: GyanMishra
To: Dhruv Dhody ;
Cc: draft-peng-pce-entropy-label-posit...@ietf.org
;pce@ietf.org
;pce-chairs ;
Date: 2024年02月06日 11:12
Subject: Re: [Pce] WG Adoption of draft-peng-pce-entropy-label-position-10
I reviewed the draft and supp
I reviewed the draft and support WG adoption.
I believe this ELP PCE capability extension maybe helpful in determining
the position to place the ELI. EL label. According to RFC 8662 a {ELI,EL}
label must be placed after every SID in the sid list based on the ERLD. I
maybe a good idea to explain
: Re: [Pce] WG Adoption of draft-peng-pce-entropy-label-position-10
Hi Dhruv and WG,
I surport the adoption of this draft, it is very useful. but I have a few minor
(non-blocking) comments:
7.1. New SR PCE Capability Flag Registry
TBD11 is very strange. It is recommended to number it in th
Hi Andrew,
Thanks for your reply!
It seems we may agree on all comments. Please see inline with [Quan].
- Is there any value in having a reference to draft-ietf-idr-bgp-srmpls-elp-00?
From the read I don't see any other purpose than "this is also ongoing" and
can likely be removed?
[Quan]: Th
Hi Dhruv and WG,
I surport the adoption of this draft, it is very useful. but I have a few minor
(non-blocking) comments:
7.1. New SR PCE Capability Flag Registry
TBD11 is very strange. It is recommended to number it in the order of TBD1,
2..., or remove the number.
7.3 New SR-ERO Flag Registry
Hi Quan,
Replies inline below.
Thanks
Andrew
From: "xiong.q...@zte.com.cn"
Date: Sunday, February 4, 2024 at 3:26 AM
To: "Andrew Stone (Nokia)"
Cc: "d...@dhruvdhody.com" , "pce@ietf.org" ,
"pce-cha...@ietf.org" ,
"draft-peng-pce-entropy-label-posit...@ietf.org"
Subject: Re: WG Adoption of
Hi,
I support the adoption as co-author.
===
JUNFENG ZHAO 赵俊峰
光网络技术和应用研究部
中国信息通信研究院（原工业与信息化部电信研究院）技术与标准研究所
Research Institute of Telecommunications Transmission (RITT),
China Academy of Information Communications Technology(CAIC
pce-chairs
;draft-peng-pce-entropy-label-posit...@ietf.org
;
Date: 2024年02月04日 17:43
Subject: RE: [Pce] WG Adoption of draft-peng-pce-entropy-label-position-10
Hi WG,
I have reviewed the document and there is no objection for WG adoption.
Please find some editing comments for authors&
Hi WG,
I have reviewed the document and there is no objection for WG adoption.
Please find some editing comments for authors' reference as below.
Best
Xuesong
---
1. Introduction
...This document proposes a set of extensions for PCEP to configure the ELP
information for SR- MPLS networks.
Hi Andrew,
Thanks for your detailed review and suggestions! Much appreciated!
Please see in line with [Quan].
- Is there any value in having a reference to draft-ietf-idr-bgp-srmpls-elp-00?
From the read I don't see any other purpose than "this is also ongoing" and
can likely be removed?
[Qua
Hi Authors and WG.
Overall the document reads pretty clear. Some comments/feedback from doing a
read through:
- Is there any value in having a reference to draft-ietf-idr-bgp-srmpls-elp-00?
From the read I don't see any other purpose than "this is also ongoing" and
can likely be removed?
-
Hi WG,
I support the adoption of the draft. It provides a simple and useful pcep
extension to indicate the entropy label position within the segment list.
I've reviewed the draft and think it's aligned with the BGP ELP extension draft.
Regards,
Yao___
Hi Dhruv and WG,
I support the adoption as co-author.
This draft is useful and reasonable for PCEP extensions to configure the
entropy label positions in SR-MPLS networks as described in RFC8662.
Thanks,
Quan
Original
From: DhruvDhody
To: pce@ietf.org ;
Cc: pce-chairs
;draft-peng-pce-en
Hi,
I support the adoption as co-author.
邮件原文发件人：Dhruv Dhody 收件人：pce 抄 送:
pce-chairs ,draft-peng-pce-entropy-label-position
发送时间：2024-01-27 00:49:28主题：WG
Adoption of draft-peng-pce-entropy-label-position-10
Hi WG,This email begins the WG adoption poll for
draft-peng-pce-entropy-l
27 matches
Mail list logo
