Hi Marina,
Version 16 submitted, which should solve your comments:
- Added statements into section 4.1 and 4.2 to clarify whether it is
required to reflect algorithm related information in other PCEP messages
- Updated links for specific sections into other RFCs
- Mo
Hi Marina,
Thanks a lot, for comments. Please see inline .
Regards,
Samuel
From: Marina Fizgeer
Sent: Tuesday, December 17, 2024 9:33 AM
To: Aijun Wang ; 'Dhruv Dhody'
; pce@ietf.org
Cc: 'pce-chairs' ; draft-ietf-pce-sid-a...@ietf.org
Subject: RE: [EXTERNAL] [Pce] 答复: WGLC for draft-ietf-pce-
Hi, all,
I have also some comments about this draft.
I read this document.
What is missing, from my point of view, is the description of use of new flag
in ERO sub object and LSPA object related to different message types.
For example, PCInit, report. Is it MUST to include it in report if it was i
