Same experience with JAWS.
I guess it's because EAC is using 100% CPU and thus makes JAWS/Window-Eyes
extremely sluggish.
-Original Message-
From: pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On
Behalf Of Tim Crawford (GI4OPH)
Sent: 6. august 2012 23:57
To: 'PC Au
We're talking a TV toner right? I hear that the WMC set up is best done by
some one sighted. But the actual use, it's fine. As for the card it self, I
can't comment not really having used one, and not knowing what brand you are
looking at. The sound depends on how good the speakers are and it shoul
If we're talking TV Tuner cards, they're no harder to install than any
other cards plus there are USB options, which are even easier to install.
On 08/07/2012 07:42 AM, HHamit Campos wrote:
We're talking a TV toner right? I hear that the WMC set up is best done by
some one sighted. But the actu
My computer isn't super fast but it chugs a long at a pretty good pace.
However, sometimes when I am ripping or burning a cd it happens to me as
well, no matter what burning program I'm using.
Maybe having a hardware speech synth would fix this? That's a rarety these
days...
bb
- Original
never had this happen with eac and window eyes my computer is responsive and
does not bogg down.
- Original Message -
From: "Brett Boyer"
To: "PC Audio Discussion List"
Sent: Tuesday, August 07, 2012 11:25 AM
Subject: Re: eac and window-eyes
My computer isn't super fast but it chugs
Because processing audio can command a lot from a computer, I have a
second computer to perform tasks such as CD ripping, audio recording,
audio editing, format conversions and stream capturing. I have had
this second computer setup since 2006 and it has been well worth the
investment.
Kelly
I'm curious. How many processors does each person have? A dual core
processor would run a bit slower in general (although it may not be
noticeable) but would handle audio processing tasks better. A single
core system would definitely seem sluggish when doing a lot of audio
processing. I know when I
I have a Quad Core CPU but it's quite old.
It's an Intel Quad Core (Core2 Quad Q8300).
-Original Message-
From: pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On
Behalf Of Christopher Chaltain
Sent: 7. august 2012 20:37
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: eac a
Well, that blows my theory. I think memory is also a key factor,
especially with Windows XP systems. I had a significantly noticeable
performance improvement when I bumped my system up to 4G from 2G. I
think the combination of what I was running, Windows XP, JAWS, Switch,
SoundTaxi and so on was r
Hi,
The current PC here has a Intel i5 2500k cpu, with 8gb of ram. During
extraction or ripping with eac, I've found exactly the same delay in speech
as my old Pentium 4, and even the ancient win 98 machine which preceded it.
This delayed response in speech output seems only to occur when extra
I'm with you on this, one hundred per cent.
Joe
At 19:05 07/08/2012, you wrote:
Because processing audio can command a lot from a computer, I have a
second computer to perform tasks such as CD ripping, audio recording,
audio editing, format conversions and stream capturing. I have had
this seco
What is the difference between the effect of running MP3 files through
the program MP3 Gain or normalizing them with MP3 Direct Cut? My
impression is that the normalized files all sound about the same volume,
while the MP3 gain processed files have clearly different volumes. What
are the rela
12 matches
Mail list logo
