the system.
Firstly, if you're one of those people who are absolutely obsessed with
accessibility then this system may not be your choice given the system
has a whole heap of features and functions that are not accessible.
Having siad that however the audio quality from this system is pure g
Awesome, thank you for giving me a better idea on what to look for. I
was able to locate this composite option in both user manuals, the
dm-620 and the ls-14.
I also contacted Olympus's tech support this morning and was given a
pretty decent comparison between these two devices, along with the l
---
From: "Walter"
To: "'PC Audio Discussion List'"
Sent: Thursday, August 01, 2013 5:04 PM
Subject: Laptops and audio quality
Hi to all. Last Friday lightning struck my home and wiped out nearly all my
media equipment, including my high spec PC and my Toshiba l
Hi to all. Last Friday lightning struck my home and wiped out nearly all my
media equipment, including my high spec PC and my Toshiba laptop. I will
need to replace those and as audio is my main concern I would like to ask
the group; in your opinion, which laptop, or laptop manufacturer produces
I'm quite aware that aac is lossie. I've been following compression
technology since early 1997, thanks for the headsup though smile.
-Original Message-
From: Dane Trethowan
Sent: Sunday, November 13, 2011 4:35 PM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: audio quali
cussion List
> Subject: Re: audio quality
>
> Apple lossless is ALAC. I've never seen anything encoded with it however.
> On Nov 13, 2011, at 7:37 AM, Richard Claypool wrote:
>
>> my bad, I thought flac was apple lossless.
>>
>> -Original Message-
I never knew who made apple flac, so misunderstood the message, thanks for
the knowledge.
-Original Message-
From: David McLean
Sent: Sunday, November 13, 2011 9:04 AM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: audio quality
Apple lossless is ALAC. I've never seen anything en
PC Audio Discussion List
> Subject: Re: audio quality
>
> Yes, but that could change now that Apple recently made it open source. I
> don't know what would make it any better than flac, shn, or any of the
> others except if you used an Ipod, now you can generate the files with ot
lossless.
>
> -Original Message- From: Brent Harding
> Sent: Saturday, November 12, 2011 3:26 PM
> To: PC Audio Discussion List
> Subject: Re: audio quality
>
> Yes, but that could change now that Apple recently made it open source. I
> don't know what would
my bad, I thought flac was apple lossless.
-Original Message-
From: Brent Harding
Sent: Saturday, November 12, 2011 3:26 PM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: audio quality
Yes, but that could change now that Apple recently made it open source. I
don't know what would ma
uot;
To: "'PC Audio Discussion List'"
Sent: Saturday, November 12, 2011 1:49 PM
Subject: RE: audio quality
Ah see that's the thing about Apple Losless, If you use it, you have to
play
it either on your Ipod, or Itunes. So If you don't have them, or if y
...@pc-audio.org]
On Behalf Of Brent Harding
Sent: Saturday, November 12, 2011 12:42 PM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: audio quality
I heard that Apple made their lossless format open source. I'm not sure why
they would do that or what makes it better or different than the rest
ut don't know anyone who uses shn any more. For lossless
trading, flac is the standard.
-Original Message-
From: Brent Harding
Sent: Saturday, November 12, 2011 12:41 PM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: audio quality
I heard that Apple made their lossless format open sour
er 12, 2011 12:56 PM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: audio quality
easy cd da extracter can rip to wma lossless.
- Original Message -
From: "Hamit Campos"
To: "'PC Audio Discussion List'"
Sent: Saturday, November 12, 2011 9:27 AM
Subject: RE: audio
easy cd da extracter can rip to wma lossless.
- Original Message -
From: "Hamit Campos"
To: "'PC Audio Discussion List'"
Sent: Saturday, November 12, 2011 9:27 AM
Subject: RE: audio quality
Yep, PCM 44100 KHZ 16 bit is fine for music, that's what
sn't use Itunes.
- Original Message -
From: "Richard Claypool"
To: "PC Audio Discussion List"
Sent: Saturday, November 12, 2011 10:14 AM
Subject: Re: audio quality
I don't use wma lossless, the bootleggers I deal with use flac, and it's
not limited to windows.
--
I don't use wma lossless, the bootleggers I deal with use flac, and it's not
limited to windows.
-Original Message-
From: Hamit Campos
Sent: Saturday, November 12, 2011 10:27 AM
To: 'PC Audio Discussion List'
Subject: RE: audio quality
Yep, PCM 44100 KHZ 16 b
-audio.org [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org]
On Behalf Of Sunshine
Sent: Saturday, November 12, 2011 12:24 AM
To: pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Subject: audio quality
in terms of audio quality for file types which is the best for archiving
music/ or spoken word?
To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank em
In terms of audio quality, pcm of course. Next would be lossless compression
like flac and monkey's audio. For voice, I suppose you could even use lossy
formats like mp3 and ogg.
- Original Message -
From: "Sunshine"
To:
Sent: Saturday, November 12, 2011 12:24 AM
in terms of audio quality for file types which is the best for archiving music/
or spoken word?
To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to:
pc-audio-unsubscr...@pc-audio.org
audio discussion list. "
Sent: Friday, December 22, 2006 2:20 PM
Subject: Poor PC Audio quality/was Re: WMP 11 and poor audio quality
> Hi again,
>
> Since my initial post, I have discovered that *all audio on my
> husband's PC is of poor quality. So, I guess I am thinking
Hi again,
Since my initial post, I have discovered that *all audio on my
husband's PC is of poor quality. So, I guess I am thinking it could
be the sound card, the speakers, a setting in Audio HQ or
somewhere. Since this happened all at once, I am doubting whether it
is the sound card or spe
Hi,
Might not be what you want to hear but you can roll back to version ten.
Keith
- Original Message -
From: "Norma A. Boge-Conyers" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "PC audio discussion list. "
Sent: Thursday, December 21, 2006 7:26 PM
Subject: WMP 11 and poor audi
Hi listers, my husband just installed WMP 11 and now the quality of
the audio is muffled, like there is a setting enabled that should not
be or vice versa. Even using the WMP 11 EQ didn't help
completely. So far the quality is poor when playing an MP3 file or
commercial CD. I found a suggest
G'day folks,
Okie this might seem like a daft question...
Can anyone confirm if a CD created from tracks in a WMA lossless format
(originally ripped using Windows Media Player 10.0) has the same audio
quality as that of the tracks from the original CD? For example, if I use
either WMP 10
Hi Tim, yes it will improve the audio quality depending on the microphone on
the cordless phone in question, and the quality of the Skype connection. I
use the Actiontech Internet Phone Wizard. It allows you to make Skype calls
from a cordless phone, and it's very useable.
The Minx, the Int
I produce a podcast in which one of the participants is using a cordless phone.
Although I have a good phone interface, I'd like to improve the audio quality.
I've thought of skype as a possible solution. My question is this. On the skype
web site they talk about equipment which you c
Hi Steve. Thanks for that.
- Original Message -
From: "Steve Pattison" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2004 8:03 PM
Subject: Re: Audio Quality of Skype
> This is definitely a matter of personal opinion but I think Skype i
This is definitely a matter of personal opinion but I think Skype is
one of the best voice chat programs I've ever used with very clear
audio which is equal to or perhaps better than phone quality.
*** REPLY SEPARATOR ***
On 16/06/2004 at 5:20 PM Gary Wood wrote:
Hi Steve. Is the
29 matches
Mail list logo
