Re: a layman's question

2006-05-15 Thread Gary Wood
Probably 24 bit would be better! - Original Message - From: "Joe Bollard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "pc -audio" Sent: Saturday, May 13, 2006 4:44 PM Subject: a layman's question > hi friends, i'm using the "edirol r-1" flash card reco

Re: a layman's question

2006-05-15 Thread Jerry Richer
Joe! 24 bit is higher quality but 16 bit is a lot more standard. CD quality is defined as 16 bit. I guess I'd use 24 bit for very special recordings but for everyday high quality recordings I'd use 16 bit. Jerry Chirp|Chirp|Chirp: It's the Bat, Chirping Bat .Com ! New DEC-T

Re: a layman's question

2006-05-13 Thread Scott
I would use Wav 16 bit. That is standard if you change it to the Pc for some reason. At 03:44 PM 5/13/2006, you wrote: >hi friends, i'm using the "edirol r-1" flash card recorder, managing it >fine, it gives me a number of options when recording, i want to record in >wav files, i have a choic

Re: a layman's question

2006-05-13 Thread Darrell Shandrow
ournal.com - Original Message - From: "Joe Bollard" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "pc -audio" Sent: Saturday, May 13, 2006 1:44 PM Subject: a layman's question > hi friends, i'm using the "edirol r-1" flash card recorder, managing it > f

a layman's question

2006-05-13 Thread Joe Bollard
hi friends, i'm using the "edirol r-1" flash card recorder, managing it fine, it gives me a number of options when recording, i want to record in wav files, i have a choice of wav sixteen bit, or wav twenty four bit, for the best quality which of the two should i use, hope someone can help, regar