that it
offers and I'd like to at least be able to try it.
Larry
- Original Message -
From: "Jay Williams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "PC audio discussion list. "
Sent: Saturday, May 21, 2005 10:44 AM
Subject: Re: music match, go away, come again
t;Sun Sparkle" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "PC audio discussion list. "
Sent: Friday, May 20, 2005 4:19 PM
Subject: Re: music match, go away, come again another day
> window eyes works perfectly well with Music match and i have version 10
plus
> and like it for the r
window eyes works perfectly well with Music match and i have version 10 plus
and like it for the reason you can make mp3 pro files.
- Original Message -
From: "Jay Williams" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "PC audio discussion list. "
Sent: Friday, May 20, 2005 5:32 PM
Subject: music match, go a
hi. it's been pretty well-known that Music Match is inaccessible. Plenty of
other ripping programs out there though, and some of them free.
At 05:32 PM 5/20/2005, you wrote:
Jay here,
I notice that nobody really wanted to go there again, but I did, so I went
to control panel to see whether I was
If you want to set the volumes of MP3 files so that they are all equal, try
MP3GAIN. This is free and easy to use software and works great.
Kevin
- Original Message -
From: "cris hall" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "pc audio" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, October 21, 2004 8:42 AM
Subject
I tried using it with Jaws, and got nowhere with it, and it was a pain in
the you know where to get rid of it after installing it. I'm not sure about
trying to use it with windoweyes. What exactly are you wanting to do with
it?
Maybe I could help you find something that will work better with ja
lt;[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Tuesday, August 10, 2004 7:09 AM
Subject: Re: Music Match
>
> Music Match is not accessible enough.
I didn't like the way the tracks sounded
when ripped either. to me they sounded
scratchy. CDEX does a far more superior
job!
>
Music Match is not accessible enough. I didn't like the way the tracks sounded when
ripped either. to me they sounded scratchy. CDEX does a far more superior job!
-- "Gary Wood" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi all. I don't know if this has been discussed before, but I heard that a program
called
Monday, August 09, 2004 5:17 PM
Subject: Re: Music Match
> Hi Paul. Thanks for that. I think
I'll stick with CDex.
> - Original Message -
> From: "Paul Hutson"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> To: "PC audio discussion list. "
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
&
Hi Paul. Thanks for that. I think I'll stick with CDex.
- Original Message -
From: "Paul Hutson" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "PC audio discussion list. " <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, August 09, 2004 3:39 PM
Subject: Re: Music Match
> Hi Gary.
Thanks, Robert.
- Original Message -
From: "Robert Stokes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "PC audio discussion list. " <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Monday, August 09, 2004 3:40 PM
Subject: Re: Music Match
> Hi Gary,
>
> MusicMatch has some very useful f
I have Music Match, the paid version. Works Great! Yes it does rip. The
free version does that too, just not as fast
To join my Help list send a blank email to To join my Help list send a
blank email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] To join the
sister list for Help and chat send a blank email to
[EMAI
Hi Gary,
MusicMatch has some very useful features but unfortunately, is a very long
way from being blind friendly. WinAmp is a much better programme from our
point of view.
Best.
Robert.
___
PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more...
http:
Hi Gary.
It has been my experience that Music Match is VERY INACCESSABLE.
I struggled with it for a couple of months and finally gave up. I found
CDEX MUCH more accessable and I am VERY confortable using it.
Just my 2 cents worth.
Sincerely,
Paul
- Original Message -
From: "Gary Wood" <
14 matches
Mail list logo
