Roberts
Sent: Sunday, February 10, 2013 1:43 AM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: Accessibility of Adobe Audition
I do not claim to be knowledgeable regarding noise reduction. However,
most of the time I have dealt with old recordings which have been
subjected to noise reduction
rts
>On 2/9/2013 12:25 PM, Brian Olesen wrote:
>> Hi,
>> the noise remover in Audacity is far better.
>>
>> Brian
>>
>> -Oprindelig meddelelse- From: Curtis Delzer
>> Sent: Saturday, February 09, 2013 5:15 PM
>> To: PC Audio Discussion List
>
noise remover in Audacity is far better.
Brian
-Oprindelig meddelelse- From: Curtis Delzer
Sent: Saturday, February 09, 2013 5:15 PM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: Accessibility of Adobe Audition
"auto noise capture" in sound forge is great, and
then the trick is to get
Hi,
the noise remover in Audacity is far better.
Brian
-Oprindelig meddelelse-
From: Curtis Delzer
Sent: Saturday, February 09, 2013 5:15 PM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: Accessibility of Adobe Audition
"auto noise capture" in sound forge is great, and
then th
oday and give it a try.
>-Original Message-
>From: Hamit Campos
>Sent: Monday, December 03, 2012 11:21 PM
>To: 'PC Audio Discussion List'
>Subject: RE: Accessibility of Adobe Audition
>I used Audition professionally for a long time and still miss it very much.
>
Thank you Rishi.
-Original Message-
From: Pc-audio [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On Behalf Of Rishi D
Mack
Sent: 07 December 2012 10:59
To: 'PC Audio Discussion List'
Subject: RE: Accessibility of Adobe Audition
If you're gana perchis adobe audition, I think you
M
To: 'PC Audio Discussion List'
Subject: RE: Accessibility of Adobe Audition
Thank you Steve for that. I think then it looks like Audition is more
trouble than its worth, and it may be ebst trying out the Sound Forge and
Reeper demos.
-Original Message-
From: Pc-audio [mailto:pc-audio
:19
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: Accessibility of Adobe Audition
In case this matters, I also really liked Audition's Noise Reduction.
However, I feel as though the Sound Forge Noise reduction
is just as good but one needs to play with it some. For example, the Sound
Forge
3, 2012 11:21 PM
>To: 'PC Audio Discussion List'
>Subject: RE: Accessibility of Adobe Audition
>I used Audition professionally for a long time and still miss it very much.
>Actually I should care because I believe this does surround sound too no?
>-Original Message-
I see.
-Original Message-
From: Pc-audio [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On Behalf Of Merv Keck
Sent: Tuesday, December 04, 2012 8:27 AM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: Accessibility of Adobe Audition
Adobe Audition still has the best noise reduction I have ever seen on
kept
waiting for a new version to come out but it never did. I'm going to
download Reaper today and give it a try.
-Original Message-
From: Hamit Campos
Sent: Monday, December 03, 2012 11:21 PM
To: 'PC Audio Discussion List'
Subject: RE: Accessibility of Adobe Audition
cumings
Sent: 04 December 2012 01:37
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: Accessibility of Adobe Audition
Samuel why don't you try reaper with re-access. It is a very accessible
multitrack recorder and only costs $60.
- Original Message -
From: "Samuel Wilkins"
-audio.org] On Behalf Of Vítek
Sent: 02 December 2012 18:32
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: Accessibility of Adobe Audition
Hi Sam,
My view might be a little subjective but from what I've tried out in the
past when I got myself Adobe Audition just to take a look at it got totally
wors
Samuel why don't you try reaper with re-access. It is a very accessible
multitrack recorder and only costs $60.
- Original Message -
From: "Samuel Wilkins"
To: "'PC Audio Discussion List'"
Sent: Monday, December 03, 2012 12:42 PM
Subject: RE: Acces
Audio Discussion List'
Subject: RE: Accessibility of Adobe Audition
The reason I am interested in using Adobe Audition is because of its
multitrack editing capabilities, as I have some tracks I would like to edit,
and I would like to be able to do this at home with Window-Eyes.
-Origin
Audio Discussion List'
Subject: RE: Accessibility of Adobe Audition
The reason I am interested in using Adobe Audition is because of its
multitrack editing capabilities, as I have some tracks I would like to edit,
and I would like to be able to do this at home with Window-Eyes.
-Origin
Behalf Of Vítek
Sent: 02 December 2012 18:32
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: Accessibility of Adobe Audition
Hi Sam,
My view might be a little subjective but from what I've tried out in the
past when I got myself Adobe Audition just to take a look at it got totally
worse than e.g
response files into this. Thank you.
-Original Message-
From: Pc-audio [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On Behalf Of Steve
Jacobson
Sent: 02 December 2012 19:32
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: Accessibility of Adobe Audition
Samyuel,
I am a Window-Eyes user and I used
Your cautions are legitimate, but there were some changes that were intended to
help screen readers between Adobe audition 2 and 3. I have not experimented
enough to know where things are now, but if
someone has a reason to want to use Audition, I really think it is worth trying
the demo to se
Samyuel,
I am a Window-Eyes user and I used Adobe Audition in its early days and
CoolEdit before then which Adobe purchased. The current version of Audition
conveys information to screen readers using other
methods that are not evident from the screen. Mostly, I think MSAA is used,
although
Hi Sam,
My view might be a little subjective but from what I've tried out in the past
when I got myself Adobe Audition just to take a look at it got totally worse
than e.g. 2.1 version of Adobe Audition when you know they changed their label
from Cool Edit which was the predecessor of that one.
21 matches
Mail list logo
