I think it'd be very good but good luck in being able to work that one out!
Kevin
E-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Original Message -
From: "David Reynolds" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "'PC Audio Discussion List'"
Sent: Saturday, October 06, 2007 2
: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
[mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Kevin Lloyd
Sent: 06 October 2007 07:53
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: A conversion question:
An uncompressed lossless track from an audio CD is approximately 3 times
larger than it's MP3 equivalent encoded at 320 kbps. Typi
No, but Neither will it be reconvertable without accumulating damage. 4
minutes might come out to 10 megs, which might be somewhere between a third and
a quarter. This is a rough estimate.
Hope this helps.
- Original Message -
From: albert griffith
To: 'PC Audio Discussion List
No, far less of a size than the original, same applies to all
compression but if you're going to use 320KBPS then in my view you're
wasting your time, may as well use one of the lossless formats such
as FLAC as the difference in file size won't be all that much and you
you'll be keeping the
An uncompressed lossless track from an audio CD is approximately 3 times
larger than it's MP3 equivalent encoded at 320 kbps. Typically, the
uncompressed track would be around the 30 meg mark for a 5 minute track
whereas the MP3 equivalent would be around the 10 meg mark.
If you're ripping in
