Re: .MP3 or .Wav

2007-07-24 Thread DJ DOCTOR P
age - From: "Jerry Richer" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "PC audio discussion list. " Sent: Tuesday, July 24, 2007 7:53 AM Subject: Re: .MP3 or .Wav > There are several levels of MP3. The larger the MP3 file is for a > given Wave file, the better the audio qua

Re: .MP3 or .Wav

2007-07-24 Thread Morey Worthington
Hi Jerry, Thank you very much for the detailed explanation which made absolute sense. Will try to put information to good use. Thank you again, Morey Worthington Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... http://www.pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank email to: [EMA

Re: .MP3 or .Wav

2007-07-24 Thread Jerry Richer
There are several levels of MP3. The larger the MP3 file is for a given Wave file, the better the audio quality. The largest file is the one that is not compressed at all and is the original Wave file. Now there are several levels of Wave files also but the Wave file quality is determined a

Re: mp3 or wav

2004-08-28 Thread Morey Worthington
Hello to Dane and all. Thanks for all the fine pointers on my question. Will now have to put them to use. Thanks again, Morey ___ PC-Audio List Help, Guidelines, Archives and more... http://www.pc-audio.org To unsubscribe from this list, send a blank

Re: mp3 or wav

2004-08-27 Thread Sun Sparkle
i would either recomand either mp3 or mp4 i think the quality of mp4 is a lot better then mp3 - Original Message - From: "Morey Worthington" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Pc-audio" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, August 27, 2004 11:31 AM Subject: mp3 or wav > Hello all, > I am copying my vi

Re: mp3 or wav

2004-08-27 Thread Sun Sparkle
ihave edited an mp3 already with gold wave and it worked great - Original Message - From: "ron scott" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "PC audio discussion list. " <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, August 27, 2004 12:50 PM Subject: Re: mp3 or wav > Hi Morey,

Re: mp3 or wav

2004-08-27 Thread Gary Petraccaro
It's all up to you and the settings you pick. For sure, if you picked .WAV, it would be as complete a copy as you could get and you could always convert from that to something else later. On the other hand, you would still get compression, saving space, even at 256 or 320 using MP3, and it would

Re: mp3 or wav

2004-08-27 Thread Dane Trethowan
tting for vbr (variable bit rate)? >- Original Message - From: "doc" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >To: "PC audio discussion list. " <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Sent: Friday, August 27, 2004 2:32 PM >Subject: Re: mp3 or wav > > >>Can I get more infor

Re: mp3 or wav

2004-08-27 Thread Gary Wood
e bit rate)? - Original Message - From: "doc" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "PC audio discussion list. " <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, August 27, 2004 2:32 PM Subject: Re: mp3 or wav Can I get more information on "LAME VBR"? Doc Wright http://wrightplaceinc.net *W

Re: mp3 or wav

2004-08-27 Thread Gary Wood
It sounds like the Lame encoders are a good thing for MP3's. I have it with CDex, and it does sound like with Lame that the quality is about as good as the original wav file. - Original Message - From: "Morey Worthington" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Pc-audio" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Frid

Re: mp3 or wav

2004-08-27 Thread doc
; <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "PC audio discussion list. " <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Sent: Friday, August 27, 2004 10:41 AM Subject: Re: mp3 or wav -BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 If you're really worried about quality and you're not particularly concerned a

Re: mp3 or wav

2004-08-27 Thread Matt
Beg to differ here. As long as you do not change bit rates, encoding an MP3 from a wav file, and then going back to Wav from that same MP3 later on will not cause a loss in quality. That is to say, your newly rendered Wav file will be the same quality as your MP3 file, because a Wav file is a ph

Re: mp3 or wav

2004-08-27 Thread Matt
Your computer will record to wav format by default, but you can choose what format the recording is rendered to when it is saved. I suggest that you choose to save your recording as an MP3, with a bit depth of at least 192 KBPS, and a sampling rate of 44100HZ. I tend to use 192 KBPS or higher f

Re: mp3 or wav

2004-08-27 Thread ron scott
Hi Morey, part of the answer might lay in the recording program you use. If you are doing editing, gold wave, for example, only edits in wave files. So noise reduction, pop and click removal, etc, has to be done in wave, before converting to other formats. H T H _

Re: mp3 or wav

2004-08-27 Thread Dane Trethowan
-BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE- Hash: SHA1 If you're really worried about quality and you're not particularly concerned about disc space (perhaps you'd rather copy to DVD'S for your record collection rather than CD'S) then you may consider a lossless compression format such as FLAC. A tipi