: tim-crawford
-Original Message-
From: pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org]
On Behalf Of Kelly Pierce
Sent: 08 August 2012 12:48
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: configuring eac
Jim,
What is updated with EAC is the LAME codec rather than the inte
Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: configuring eac
hello folks!
excuse me if I am asking, but what's the latest version of EAC? I'd like to
try it out and see if it's better than audio grabber, if it is, then i'll
use that instead.
Regards,
Jörgen Hansson!
Tel: +4
kype: djtropical4532
-Ursprungligt meddelande-
From: Kelly Pierce
Sent: Wednesday, August 08, 2012 1:47 PM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: configuring eac
Jim,
What is updated with EAC is the LAME codec rather than the interface.
Consider reviewing your version of LAME to determine if it
t;
> -Original Message-
> From: pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org]
> On Behalf Of Jim Ruby
> Sent: 8. august 2012 10:25
> To: 'PC Audio Discussion List'
> Subject: RE: configuring eac
>
> I figured it out, I did not change
: pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On
Behalf Of Jim Ruby
Sent: 8. august 2012 10:25
To: 'PC Audio Discussion List'
Subject: RE: configuring eac
I figured it out, I did not change the drop down near the top to the correct
command line format, still int
I figured it out, I did not change the drop down near the top to the correct
command line format, still interested in what others are using though.
Thanks.
-Original Message-
From: pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org]
On Behalf Of Jim Ruby
Sent: Wednesday,
