I'm quite aware that aac is lossie. I've been following compression
technology since early 1997, thanks for the headsup though smile.
-Original Message-
From: Dane Trethowan
Sent: Sunday, November 13, 2011 4:35 PM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: audio quali
From: Brent Harding
>> Sent: Saturday, November 12, 2011 3:26 PM
>> To: PC Audio Discussion List
>> Subject: Re: audio quality
>>
>> Yes, but that could change now that Apple recently made it open source. I
>> don't know what would make it any better than
I never knew who made apple flac, so misunderstood the message, thanks for
the knowledge.
-Original Message-
From: David McLean
Sent: Sunday, November 13, 2011 9:04 AM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: audio quality
Apple lossless is ALAC. I've never seen anything en
PC Audio Discussion List
> Subject: Re: audio quality
>
> Yes, but that could change now that Apple recently made it open source. I
> don't know what would make it any better than flac, shn, or any of the
> others except if you used an Ipod, now you can generate the files with ot
lossless.
>
> -Original Message- From: Brent Harding
> Sent: Saturday, November 12, 2011 3:26 PM
> To: PC Audio Discussion List
> Subject: Re: audio quality
>
> Yes, but that could change now that Apple recently made it open source. I
> don't know what would
my bad, I thought flac was apple lossless.
-Original Message-
From: Brent Harding
Sent: Saturday, November 12, 2011 3:26 PM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: audio quality
Yes, but that could change now that Apple recently made it open source. I
don't know what would ma
uot;
To: "'PC Audio Discussion List'"
Sent: Saturday, November 12, 2011 1:49 PM
Subject: RE: audio quality
Ah see that's the thing about Apple Losless, If you use it, you have to
play
it either on your Ipod, or Itunes. So If you don't have them, or if y
...@pc-audio.org]
On Behalf Of Brent Harding
Sent: Saturday, November 12, 2011 12:42 PM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: audio quality
I heard that Apple made their lossless format open source. I'm not sure why
they would do that or what makes it better or different than the rest
ut don't know anyone who uses shn any more. For lossless
trading, flac is the standard.
-Original Message-
From: Brent Harding
Sent: Saturday, November 12, 2011 12:41 PM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: audio quality
I heard that Apple made their lossless format open sour
er 12, 2011 12:56 PM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: audio quality
easy cd da extracter can rip to wma lossless.
- Original Message -
From: "Hamit Campos"
To: "'PC Audio Discussion List'"
Sent: Saturday, November 12, 2011 9:27 AM
Subject: RE: audio
easy cd da extracter can rip to wma lossless.
- Original Message -
From: "Hamit Campos"
To: "'PC Audio Discussion List'"
Sent: Saturday, November 12, 2011 9:27 AM
Subject: RE: audio quality
Yep, PCM 44100 KHZ 16 bit is fine for music, that's what
sn't use Itunes.
- Original Message -
From: "Richard Claypool"
To: "PC Audio Discussion List"
Sent: Saturday, November 12, 2011 10:14 AM
Subject: Re: audio quality
I don't use wma lossless, the bootleggers I deal with use flac, and it's
not limited to windows.
--
I don't use wma lossless, the bootleggers I deal with use flac, and it's not
limited to windows.
-Original Message-
From: Hamit Campos
Sent: Saturday, November 12, 2011 10:27 AM
To: 'PC Audio Discussion List'
Subject: RE: audio quality
Yep, PCM 44100 KHZ 16 b
Yep, PCM 44100 KHZ 16 bit is fine for music, that's what CDs are anyways.
Even wma lossless would be fine but only WMP can make it. That's why I wish
Olympus would dump regular old WMA, and get WMA Losless on their recorders.
-Original Message-
From: pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org [mailto:p
In terms of audio quality, pcm of course. Next would be lossless compression
like flac and monkey's audio. For voice, I suppose you could even use lossy
formats like mp3 and ogg.
- Original Message -
From: "Sunshine"
To:
Sent: Saturday, November 12, 2011 12:24 AM
Subject: audio qualit
Hi Steve. Thanks for that.
- Original Message -
From: "Steve Pattison" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Wednesday, June 16, 2004 8:03 PM
Subject: Re: Audio Quality of Skype
> This is definitely a matter of personal opinion but I think Skype i
This is definitely a matter of personal opinion but I think Skype is
one of the best voice chat programs I've ever used with very clear
audio which is equal to or perhaps better than phone quality.
*** REPLY SEPARATOR ***
On 16/06/2004 at 5:20 PM Gary Wood wrote:
Hi Steve. Is the
17 matches
Mail list logo
