Thanks, Cornell!
- Original Message -
From: "Cornell Ligon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, April 06, 2007 8:50 AM
Subject: Re: SOUND QUALITY OF DIFFERENT AUDIO PLAYERS
> Hi Gary,
> I had the same experience on the B&K audio site as well. I'll hold
inal Message -
From: "Cornell Ligon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Sunday, April 01, 2007 9:21 AM
Subject: Re: SOUND QUALITY OF DIFFERENT AUDIO PLAYERS
> Gary,
> Do you have your computer incorporated into your Home Theater system?
> That's
> what I ultimately wa
ay, April 01, 2007 9:21 AM
Subject: Re: SOUND QUALITY OF DIFFERENT AUDIO PLAYERS
> Gary,
> Do you have your computer incorporated into your Home Theater system?
> That's
> what I ultimately want to do, but when I did so a few months ago, my
> computer screen didn't read wel
ot;
To: "PC audio discussion list. "
Subject: Re: SOUND QUALITY OF DIFFERENT AUDIO PLAYERS
Date: Sun, 1 Apr 2007 00:49:33 -0500
Well I like my home theater system. I play my music in surround sound, as
well as watching movies with it, and I think it sounds pretty good. I have
a Pioneer syste
on screen programming
since I can't read the screen. This may have strayed off topic, but people
were comparing audio files with home theater.
- Original Message -
From: "Cornell Ligon" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To:
Sent: Friday, March 30, 2007 9:48 AM
Subject: RE: SOUND QUA
Sent: 30 March 2007 04:48 PM
To: pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Subject: RE: SOUND QUALITY OF DIFFERENT AUDIO PLAYERS
Andre,
No, I understood what you were stating, but Im such a junky for audio
equipment in any capacity and Im familiar with Nads reputation for keeping
things simple without too many
equipment every few years
Sorry to get so far off topic.
Best Regards,
Cornell
Original Message Follows
From: André van Deventer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: "PC audio discussion list. "
To: "'PC audio discussion list. '"
Subject: RE: SOUND QUA
le to put it mildly!!
Andre
-Original Message-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Cornell Ligon
Sent: 29 March 2007 03:51 AM
To: pc-audio@pc-audio.org
Subject: RE: SOUND QUALITY OF DIFFERENT AUDIO PLAYERS
Hi,
is the Nad a power amp or a receiver? In other word
Original Message Follows
From: André van Deventer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: "PC audio discussion list. "
To: "'PC audio discussion list. '"
Subject: RE: SOUND QUALITY OF DIFFERENT AUDIO PLAYERS
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2007 21:19:37 +0200
Hi Kevin
The setu
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: "PC audio discussion list. "
To: "'PC audio discussion list. '"
Subject: RE: SOUND QUALITY OF DIFFERENT AUDIO PLAYERS
Date: Wed, 28 Mar 2007 21:19:37 +0200
Hi Kevin
The setup I use here is of course my PC with win xp and windows m
om: "Chris Skarstad" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "PC audio discussion list. "
Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2007 05:40 PM
Subject: Re: SOUND QUALITY OF DIFFERENT AUDIO PLAYERS
I think it all depends on your system. I remember
on my last system before this one, when I would
l
I think it all depends on your system. I remember
on my last system before this one, when I would
listen tto a live album, or any other album where
there was no gap between tracks on a cd, Winamp
would stop for aquick second, switch tracks and
continue. It was really annoying. On my current
s
ssage-
From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Dana S. Leslie
Sent: 2007/03/28 12:32
To: PC audio discussion list.
Subject: Re: SOUND QUALITY OF DIFFERENT AUDIO PLAYERS
I agree with you, Bruce. Winamp sounds much better to me (with or without
equalizer) than either Windows
discussion list. "
Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2007 04:10 PM
Subject: Re: SOUND QUALITY OF DIFFERENT AUDIO PLAYERS
I'm not a fan of windows media either.
Allison
- Original Message -
From: "Bruce Toews" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "PC audio discussion l
I'm not a fan of windows media either.
Allison
- Original Message -
From: "Bruce Toews" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "PC audio discussion list. "
Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2007 2:59 PM
Subject: Re: SOUND QUALITY OF DIFFERENT AUDIO PLAYERS
I disagree with you
- Original Message -
From: "Bruce Toews" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: "PC audio discussion list. "
Sent: Wednesday, March 28, 2007 2:59 PM
Subject: Re: SOUND QUALITY OF DIFFERENT AUDIO PLAYERS
I disagree with you about Windows Media. I feel it is the least
palatable o
PROTECTED]
On Behalf Of Kevin Lloyd
Sent: 28 March 2007 08:55 PM
To: PC audio discussion list.
Subject: Re: SOUND QUALITY OF DIFFERENT AUDIO PLAYERS
Hi Andre.
In my opinion windows media player provides a better listen than winamp.
There's really very little difference but specifically i
I disagree with you about Windows Media. I feel it is the least
palatable of all the player options out there. As for CD's, you are
quite correct and there's no disputing you there.
Bruce
On Wed, 28 Mar 2007 19:55:02 +0100, "Kevin Lloyd"
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> Hi Andre.
>
> In my opinion win
Hi Andre.
In my opinion windows media player provides a better listen than winamp.
There's really very little difference but specifically if you listen to live
albums or concept albums, windows media player is far superior to winamp in
playing the tracks seemlessly. I prefer windows media play
19 matches
Mail list logo
