Hi There!
The Soundlink III is still a good choice in speaker however - if you're
device supports aptX - then the B&W T7 is the better way to go, has a
better sound, tighter bass etc, sharper highs and a more emphasised mid
range.
Only problem with the T7 is that its a bigger beast than the
wistle
>> to it require it lol.
>>
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Pc-audio [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On Behalf Of Sunshine
>> Sent: Sunday, April 26, 2015 1:17 AM
>> To: PC Audio Discussion List
>> Subject: Re: Polk Audio Woodbourne b
Message-
From: Pc-audio [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On Behalf Of Sunshine
Sent: Sunday, April 26, 2015 1:17 AM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: Polk Audio Woodbourne bluetooth speaker.
Someone that i talked to said that the bowers and wilkins t7 to them has a bit
to much
Dane, I'm curious as to your opinion comparing the Bose soundlink that
sells for 300 bucks in the States and the t7. Of course, the t7 should
sound better, given price difference. But knowing you were pretty high
on the SL, I'd be curious. I haven't heard the t7, and with the
expenses we've incurre
A lot of highs come in vary handy for the roar of Godzilla 1998. The wistle to
it require it lol.
-Original Message-
From: Pc-audio [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On Behalf Of Sunshine
Sent: Sunday, April 26, 2015 1:17 AM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: Polk Audio
Wait, even the 6 and 6pluss don't support APTX? Oh this aint cool man.
-Original Message-
From: Pc-audio [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On Behalf Of Dane
Trethowan
Sent: Sunday, April 26, 2015 1:56 AM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: Polk Audio Woodbourne blue
One of the good things I guess about writing things up is that I get
good exercise in my fingers given that they have to type on the keyboard
so that makes up for people not reading what I wrote.
I wrote about Lossless Bluetooth to the listwhen you first asked about
what was the best portable
what do you mean lossless bluetooth? never heard of that.
On 4/26/2015 12:35 AM, Dane Trethowan wrote:
Unfortunately - Youtube being what it is - demonstrations of this sort
are very.. well.. subjective to say the least, it all depends on how
the demonstration was recorded in the first place an
Unfortunately - Youtube being what it is - demonstrations of this sort
are very.. well.. subjective to say the least, it all depends on how the
demonstration was recorded in the first place and the quality of
encoding, much the same as Podcasts
In the case of the Polk Audio, you're paying for
away from it. Lol! A real
shame too for something that is $600 too dude.
-Original Message-
From: Pc-audio [mailto:pc-audio-boun...@pc-audio.org] On Behalf Of Dane
Trethowan
Sent: Saturday, April 25, 2015 11:39 PM
To: PC Audio Discussion List
Subject: Re: Polk Audio Woodbourne bluetooth
Someone that i talked to said that the bowers and wilkins t7 to them has
a bit to much highs is there a way to make tonal ajustments to the speaker?
I have heard some youtube demos for the bowers and wilkins t7 and find
it great sounding, haven't found a youtube demenstration for the polk
audio
Discussion List
Subject: Re: Polk Audio Woodbourne bluetooth speaker.
Yep I have, stay away from it, I told you the best speaker to buy - for
bluetooth - and that beats the others you've mentioned by a long shot.
On 26/04/2015 1:05 PM, Sunshine wrote:
> Has anyone heard this speaker the Po
Yep I have, stay away from it, I told you the best speaker to buy - for
bluetooth - and that beats the others you've mentioned by a long shot.
On 26/04/2015 1:05 PM, Sunshine wrote:
Has anyone heard this speaker the Polk Audio Woodbourne bluetooth
speaker for 600 dollars? if so what do you t
13 matches
Mail list logo
